Recta Ratio Agibilium (The Line of Reason of Those Who Act): Perspectivesabout Autonomy in Situations of Clinical Emergency

Gonçalves Ma, D. Leal, S. Costa, Borges Ed
{"title":"Recta Ratio Agibilium (The Line of Reason of Those Who Act): Perspectivesabout Autonomy in Situations of Clinical Emergency","authors":"Gonçalves Ma, D. Leal, S. Costa, Borges Ed","doi":"10.35248/2155-9627.19.10.338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bioethicists emphasized the principle of autonomy in clinical practice as a duty of the physician and the inalienable right of the patient. However, in emergency situations, clinical judgment often privileges the principle of beneficence, in pursue to save lives. The authors describe three real, imminent and life-threatening clinical situations. Then, it was asked doctors, patients, family members and bioethicists about their judgment of the clinical actions taken. Doctors, patients and their families agreed on almost all answers. Bioethicists, on the other hand, had more opposing evaluations. Is bioethics swerving from patients’ will and from clinical practice reality? Paul Ricouer's thought deserves the authors reflexion on its phronesis dimension. Acting with prudence and providing an humanized clinical practice lead us to find the recta ratio agibilium (the line of reason of those who act).","PeriodicalId":89408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical research & bioethics","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical research & bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2155-9627.19.10.338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Bioethicists emphasized the principle of autonomy in clinical practice as a duty of the physician and the inalienable right of the patient. However, in emergency situations, clinical judgment often privileges the principle of beneficence, in pursue to save lives. The authors describe three real, imminent and life-threatening clinical situations. Then, it was asked doctors, patients, family members and bioethicists about their judgment of the clinical actions taken. Doctors, patients and their families agreed on almost all answers. Bioethicists, on the other hand, had more opposing evaluations. Is bioethics swerving from patients’ will and from clinical practice reality? Paul Ricouer's thought deserves the authors reflexion on its phronesis dimension. Acting with prudence and providing an humanized clinical practice lead us to find the recta ratio agibilium (the line of reason of those who act).
行为者的理性之线:临床紧急情况下的自主性透视
生物伦理学家强调临床实践中的自主原则是医生的义务和患者不可剥夺的权利。然而,在紧急情况下,临床判断往往优先于慈善原则,以追求挽救生命。作者描述了三种真实的、迫在眉睫的、危及生命的临床情况。然后,研究人员询问医生、患者、家属和生物伦理学家对所采取的临床行动的判断。医生、病人和家属对几乎所有的答案都达成了一致。另一方面,生物伦理学家则有更多的反对意见。生命伦理学是否偏离了患者的意愿和临床实践的现实?保罗·里库尔的这一思想值得作者从实践的维度进行反思。谨慎行事并提供人性化的临床实践使我们找到了行为者的理性之线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信