Evaluating the Performance, Export Competitiveness and Direction of Trade of Indian Banana in the International Market

IF 0.3 Q4 ECONOMICS
{"title":"Evaluating the Performance, Export Competitiveness and Direction of Trade of Indian Banana in the International Market","authors":"","doi":"10.35716/ijed-23196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study examined the changing pattern of international trade in bananas globally and in India at a macro level from 2000 to 2020. It analyzed the growth pattern, direction of trade, trade competitiveness, and market access issues like tariff and non-tariff barriers (NTBs) faced by exporters in major markets. The analysis revealed that the export of bananas from India increased from $8.10 thousand to $212 thousand from 2000 to 2020, with an annual growth of 21 per cent. Iran, UAE, Oman, and Saudi Arabia are the major destination markets for Indian bananas, wherein India exports more than 70 per cent of its banana export. Banana exports from India possess export competitiveness as the Nominal Protection Coefficient (NPC) was less than one (ranging between 0.28 to 0.70), and the domestic prices were lower than the international prices. Oman emerged as a stable market for banana imports from India in quantity and value terms. Iran and Nepal were the most important markets for Indian bananas but Kuwait and Saudi Arabia markets were unstable markets for Indian bananas. Among the major importing countries of Banana, Japan has imposed the highest number of notifications (164 Non-tariff Measures (NTMs)) on total imports of India since 1995. The USA imposed 119 NTMs, and the EU imposed 65 notifications. Still, it had imposed more TBT measures (35). Regarding Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) measures, agricultural goods do not involve technological prowess but only consider consumer health and safety issues, which can be harmonized as it is good for trading partners. For Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) measures driven mainly by technology, India must follow the same approach carefully. Future research should concentrate on the impact of NTMs in depth by considering all the stakeholders. Keywords: Banana export, competitiveness, Markov Chain Analysis, NPC. JEL Codes: C88, F13, Q17.","PeriodicalId":43367,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Economics and Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Economics and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35716/ijed-23196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The study examined the changing pattern of international trade in bananas globally and in India at a macro level from 2000 to 2020. It analyzed the growth pattern, direction of trade, trade competitiveness, and market access issues like tariff and non-tariff barriers (NTBs) faced by exporters in major markets. The analysis revealed that the export of bananas from India increased from $8.10 thousand to $212 thousand from 2000 to 2020, with an annual growth of 21 per cent. Iran, UAE, Oman, and Saudi Arabia are the major destination markets for Indian bananas, wherein India exports more than 70 per cent of its banana export. Banana exports from India possess export competitiveness as the Nominal Protection Coefficient (NPC) was less than one (ranging between 0.28 to 0.70), and the domestic prices were lower than the international prices. Oman emerged as a stable market for banana imports from India in quantity and value terms. Iran and Nepal were the most important markets for Indian bananas but Kuwait and Saudi Arabia markets were unstable markets for Indian bananas. Among the major importing countries of Banana, Japan has imposed the highest number of notifications (164 Non-tariff Measures (NTMs)) on total imports of India since 1995. The USA imposed 119 NTMs, and the EU imposed 65 notifications. Still, it had imposed more TBT measures (35). Regarding Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) measures, agricultural goods do not involve technological prowess but only consider consumer health and safety issues, which can be harmonized as it is good for trading partners. For Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) measures driven mainly by technology, India must follow the same approach carefully. Future research should concentrate on the impact of NTMs in depth by considering all the stakeholders. Keywords: Banana export, competitiveness, Markov Chain Analysis, NPC. JEL Codes: C88, F13, Q17.
评价印度香蕉在国际市场上的表现、出口竞争力及贸易方向
摘要该研究从宏观层面考察了2000年至2020年全球和印度香蕉国际贸易格局的变化。它分析了增长模式、贸易方向、贸易竞争力以及主要市场出口商面临的关税和非关税壁垒(NTBs)等市场准入问题。分析显示,从2000年到2020年,印度香蕉出口从810万美元增加到21.2万美元,年增长率为21%。伊朗、阿联酋、阿曼和沙特阿拉伯是印度香蕉的主要目的地市场,其中印度出口的香蕉占其出口的70%以上。印度香蕉出口的名义保护系数(NPC)小于1(0.28 ~ 0.70),国内价格低于国际价格,具有出口竞争力。阿曼在数量和价值方面成为从印度进口香蕉的稳定市场。伊朗和尼泊尔是印度香蕉最重要的市场,但科威特和沙特阿拉伯市场是印度香蕉的不稳定市场。在香蕉的主要进口国中,日本自1995年以来对印度的全部进口产品实施了最多的通知(164项非关税措施)。美国实施了119项ntm,欧盟实施了65项通报。尽管如此,它还是实施了更多的技术性贸易壁垒措施(35)。关于卫生和植物检疫措施,农产品不涉及技术实力,而只考虑消费者健康和安全问题,这些问题可以协调一致,因为这对贸易伙伴有利。对于主要由技术驱动的技术性贸易壁垒(TBT)措施,印度必须谨慎地遵循同样的方法。未来的研究应在考虑所有利益相关者的基础上,更深入地研究ntm的影响。关键词:香蕉出口,竞争力,马尔可夫链分析,NPCJEL代码:C88, F13, Q17。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信