Cultural and technical networks: a qualitative approach

IF 0.7 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
D. Zeitlyn, J. Bex, M. David
{"title":"Cultural and technical networks: a qualitative approach","authors":"D. Zeitlyn, J. Bex, M. David","doi":"10.3233/EFI-1997-15408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents results from research into the uses and usefulness of electronic bibliographic databases in academic contexts, using ethnographic and focus group techniques. This research looks at the processes of sense-making (and the breakdown of such attempts) in the ethnographic context of particular academic departments. The ethnographic and focus group data was gathered from students and staff of three faculties at three universities, addressing relations between cultural and technical networks in knowledge production and information management. 1. The BLERBS project The aim of the British Library Ethnographic Research into Bibliographic Services (BLERBS) project was to evaluate the use and non-use of electronic bibliographic services within academic contexts. The initial focus of interest was BIDS (Bath Infor­ mation and Data Services), but the research was widened to include the diversity of online and networked CD-ROM services. The team, made up of an anthropologist, a librarian and an ethnographically-oriented sociologist, set out to use ethnographic surveying methods to study the use/non-use of bibliographic sources, and conversa­ tion analytic approaches to the analysis of human-computer interaction. This paper brings together the range of themes which emerged from the ethno­ graphic dimensions of the research (which itself draws on and reflects upon ethnomethodological theory and research).","PeriodicalId":51668,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION","volume":"15 1","pages":"351-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/EFI-1997-15408","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-1997-15408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper presents results from research into the uses and usefulness of electronic bibliographic databases in academic contexts, using ethnographic and focus group techniques. This research looks at the processes of sense-making (and the breakdown of such attempts) in the ethnographic context of particular academic departments. The ethnographic and focus group data was gathered from students and staff of three faculties at three universities, addressing relations between cultural and technical networks in knowledge production and information management. 1. The BLERBS project The aim of the British Library Ethnographic Research into Bibliographic Services (BLERBS) project was to evaluate the use and non-use of electronic bibliographic services within academic contexts. The initial focus of interest was BIDS (Bath Infor­ mation and Data Services), but the research was widened to include the diversity of online and networked CD-ROM services. The team, made up of an anthropologist, a librarian and an ethnographically-oriented sociologist, set out to use ethnographic surveying methods to study the use/non-use of bibliographic sources, and conversa­ tion analytic approaches to the analysis of human-computer interaction. This paper brings together the range of themes which emerged from the ethno­ graphic dimensions of the research (which itself draws on and reflects upon ethnomethodological theory and research).
文化和技术网络:一种定性方法
本文介绍了利用民族志和焦点小组技术对学术背景下电子书目数据库的使用和有用性的研究结果。这项研究着眼于在特定学术部门的民族志背景下的意义构建过程(以及这种尝试的失败)。民族志和焦点小组数据是从三所大学三个学院的学生和工作人员中收集的,涉及知识生产和信息管理方面的文化和技术网络之间的关系。1. 大英图书馆书目服务人种学研究(BLERBS)项目的目的是评估学术背景下电子书目服务的使用和不使用情况。最初关注的焦点是巴斯信息和数据服务,但研究范围扩大到包括在线和网络化CD-ROM服务的多样性。这个团队由一名人类学家、一名图书管理员和一名以民族志为导向的社会学家组成,他们开始使用民族志调查方法来研究书目资源的使用/不使用,并使用对话分析方法来分析人机交互。本文汇集了从研究的民族志维度中出现的一系列主题(它本身借鉴并反思了民族方法学理论和研究)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION
EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Information is widely recognized as a vital resource in economic development. The skills of information handling traditionally associated with libraries, are now in great demand in all sectors, including government, business and commerce. The education and training of information professionals is, therefore, an issue of growing significance. Education for Information has been since 1983 a forum for debate and discussion on education and training issues in the sphere of information handling. It includes refereed full-length articles and short communications on matters of current concern to educators and practitioners alike. Its News section reports on significant activities and events in the international arena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信