The Perceived Prestige of Professional Journals, 1995: A Replication of the Kohl-Davis Study.

IF 0.7 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION Pub Date : 1996-01-01 DOI:10.3233/EFI-1996-14301

V. L. Blake

引用次数: 29

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to ascertain the perceived prestige of professional journals held by the deans/directors of ALA accredited schools of library and information studies and the directors of ARL libraries. The results suggest that the two survey populations hold very different views of these professional journals. This divergence of perceptions raises further questions regarding the relationship of library/information science faculty and the leadership of major library/information centers.

查看原文本刊更多论文

专业期刊的感知声望，1995:Kohl-Davis研究的复制。

本研究的目的是确定ALA认可的图书馆和信息研究学院的院长/主任以及ARL图书馆主任所持有的专业期刊的感知声望。结果表明，这两个调查人群对这些专业期刊的看法截然不同。这种看法的分歧进一步提出了关于图书馆/信息科学教师和主要图书馆/信息中心领导关系的问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Information is widely recognized as a vital resource in economic development. The skills of information handling traditionally associated with libraries, are now in great demand in all sectors, including government, business and commerce. The education and training of information professionals is, therefore, an issue of growing significance. Education for Information has been since 1983 a forum for debate and discussion on education and training issues in the sphere of information handling. It includes refereed full-length articles and short communications on matters of current concern to educators and practitioners alike. Its News section reports on significant activities and events in the international arena.