Comparative analysis of the ice coverage in the Bering sea according to the Sea Ice Index and Masie data

Artur Oganezov, V. Pishchalnik, V. Romanyuk
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the ice coverage in the Bering sea according to the Sea Ice Index and Masie data","authors":"Artur Oganezov, V. Pishchalnik, V. Romanyuk","doi":"10.35595/2414-9179-2022-1-28-450-457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative analysis of the ice cover of the Bering Sea. The analysis was performed according to the National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC) using NASA algorithms Team (Sea Ice Index) and Near-Real-Time Passive Microwave/Visible Data Sharing DMSP SSMIS Daily Polar gridded Sea Ice Concentrations and Sea Ice Concentrations from Nimbus-7 SMMR and DMSP SSM/I-SSMIS Passive Microwave Data (MASIE-NH). The absolute and relative difference of the ice cover values were calculated using the algorithms Sea Ice Index and MASIE-NH with daily discreteness for 14 ice seasons from 2006 to 2020. Despite the fact that the spatial resolutions of the data of the algorithms under consideration and the quantitative criteria for the condition for classifying a pixel as pure water or ice extent differed (the side of the pixel was 25 and 4 km, identification was 15 and 40 %, respectively), the curves of the average seasonal variation of the ice cover were in phase and that was confirmed by the high value of the correlation coefficient (0.92). It was determined that the difference in ice cover values were not critical and were within the calculation limits, which allowed using data from both sources without calculating correction factors. Sea Data Ice Index data should be appropriate for long-term analysis of inter-seasonal variability, since data series of observations with daily discreteness have been available since 1978. It was concluded that the use of both sources would be quite acceptable in the analysis of intra-seasonal fluctuations. A characteristic feature of Sea Ice Index was noted—the presence of ice throughout the warm season. Although according to literary sources, such a phenomenon in the Bering Sea was typical only for severe types of winters. That was probably due to the technical difficulties in identifying the ice extent using passive microwave sounding methods.","PeriodicalId":31498,"journal":{"name":"InterCarto InterGIS","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterCarto InterGIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2022-1-28-450-457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the ice cover of the Bering Sea. The analysis was performed according to the National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC) using NASA algorithms Team (Sea Ice Index) and Near-Real-Time Passive Microwave/Visible Data Sharing DMSP SSMIS Daily Polar gridded Sea Ice Concentrations and Sea Ice Concentrations from Nimbus-7 SMMR and DMSP SSM/I-SSMIS Passive Microwave Data (MASIE-NH). The absolute and relative difference of the ice cover values were calculated using the algorithms Sea Ice Index and MASIE-NH with daily discreteness for 14 ice seasons from 2006 to 2020. Despite the fact that the spatial resolutions of the data of the algorithms under consideration and the quantitative criteria for the condition for classifying a pixel as pure water or ice extent differed (the side of the pixel was 25 and 4 km, identification was 15 and 40 %, respectively), the curves of the average seasonal variation of the ice cover were in phase and that was confirmed by the high value of the correlation coefficient (0.92). It was determined that the difference in ice cover values were not critical and were within the calculation limits, which allowed using data from both sources without calculating correction factors. Sea Data Ice Index data should be appropriate for long-term analysis of inter-seasonal variability, since data series of observations with daily discreteness have been available since 1978. It was concluded that the use of both sources would be quite acceptable in the analysis of intra-seasonal fluctuations. A characteristic feature of Sea Ice Index was noted—the presence of ice throughout the warm season. Although according to literary sources, such a phenomenon in the Bering Sea was typical only for severe types of winters. That was probably due to the technical difficulties in identifying the ice extent using passive microwave sounding methods.
根据海冰指数和Masie资料对白令海冰覆盖的比较分析
本文对白令海的冰盖进行了对比分析。该分析是根据美国国家冰雪数据中心(NSIDC)使用NASA算法团队(海冰指数)和近实时被动微波/可见数据共享DMSP SSMIS每日极地网格海冰浓度和Nimbus-7 SMMR和DMSP SSM/I-SSMIS被动微波数据(MASIE-NH)进行的。利用海冰指数和MASIE-NH算法计算了2006 - 2020年14个冰季的绝对和相对冰盖值差异。尽管所考虑的算法数据的空间分辨率和将像元分类为纯水或冰范围的条件的定量标准不同(像元边长分别为25 km和4 km,识别率分别为15%和40%),但冰盖的平均季节变化曲线是一致的,相关系数的高值(0.92)证实了这一点。经确定,冰盖值的差异并不严重,并在计算范围内,因此可以使用两个来源的数据而无需计算校正因子。海冰指数数据应该适合长期分析季节间变率,因为自1978年以来已有逐日离散的观测数据系列。结论是,在分析季节内波动时,使用这两种来源是完全可以接受的。人们注意到海冰指数的一个特征——整个温暖季节都有冰的存在。尽管根据文献资料,白令海的这种现象只是典型的严冬。这可能是由于在使用被动微波探测方法确定冰的范围方面存在技术困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信