Methodology for regional assessment of the third level digital inequality

O. Chereshnia, M. Gribok
{"title":"Methodology for regional assessment of the third level digital inequality","authors":"O. Chereshnia, M. Gribok","doi":"10.35595/2414-9179-2022-1-28-43-57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes and analyzes the three levels of digital inequality in society currently identified, and examines the world experience of their assessment. It is shown that the third level of digital inequality is the most difficult for research. It represents an uneven distribution of opportunities for obtaining important results in real life (employment, education, participation in political life, etc.) through the use of modern technologies. The authors have developed a methodology for the regional quantitative assessment of third-level digital inequality by analyzing the popularity of Google search query topics related to three categories: “Everyday services and services”, “Education, science and technology”, “Entertainment”. These categories are highlighted as markers for evaluating the effectiveness of Internet use by the population. At the same time, an increased search interest in entertainment indicates a lower efficiency of Internet use, and a higher interest in services and education. The indexes of popularity of search queries for each of the categories are calculated and then, based on them, an integral index of the efficiency of Internet use in the regions of Russia is calculated. Statistical data for the study were collected using the Google Trends service for 2016–2020. All calculated indicators are presented on maps, their territorial features are identified and described. The lowest level of Internet use efficiency is observed in the regions of the North Caucasus, and the highest is in the Republics of Tatarstan and Sakha (Yakutia), as well as in Moscow and St. Petersburg.","PeriodicalId":31498,"journal":{"name":"InterCarto InterGIS","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterCarto InterGIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2022-1-28-43-57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article describes and analyzes the three levels of digital inequality in society currently identified, and examines the world experience of their assessment. It is shown that the third level of digital inequality is the most difficult for research. It represents an uneven distribution of opportunities for obtaining important results in real life (employment, education, participation in political life, etc.) through the use of modern technologies. The authors have developed a methodology for the regional quantitative assessment of third-level digital inequality by analyzing the popularity of Google search query topics related to three categories: “Everyday services and services”, “Education, science and technology”, “Entertainment”. These categories are highlighted as markers for evaluating the effectiveness of Internet use by the population. At the same time, an increased search interest in entertainment indicates a lower efficiency of Internet use, and a higher interest in services and education. The indexes of popularity of search queries for each of the categories are calculated and then, based on them, an integral index of the efficiency of Internet use in the regions of Russia is calculated. Statistical data for the study were collected using the Google Trends service for 2016–2020. All calculated indicators are presented on maps, their territorial features are identified and described. The lowest level of Internet use efficiency is observed in the regions of the North Caucasus, and the highest is in the Republics of Tatarstan and Sakha (Yakutia), as well as in Moscow and St. Petersburg.
第三层次数字不平等的区域评估方法
本文描述和分析了目前确定的社会数字不平等的三个层次,并考察了他们评估的世界经验。研究表明,数字不平等的第三个层面是最难研究的。它代表了通过使用现代技术在现实生活中获得重要成果(就业、教育、参与政治生活等)的机会分布不均。通过分析谷歌搜索查询主题的流行程度,作者开发了一种区域定量评估第三级数字不平等的方法,该主题涉及三类:“日常服务和服务”、“教育、科技”、“娱乐”。这些类别被突出显示为评估人口使用互联网有效性的标记。与此同时,对娱乐的搜索兴趣增加表明互联网使用效率较低,对服务和教育的兴趣较高。计算出每个类别的搜索查询的流行指数,然后,基于它们,计算出俄罗斯各地区互联网使用效率的综合指数。该研究的统计数据是使用谷歌趋势服务收集的,时间为2016-2020年。所有计算的指标都在地图上显示,它们的领土特征被识别和描述。互联网使用效率最低的是北高加索地区,最高的是鞑靼斯坦共和国和萨哈共和国(雅库特),以及莫斯科和圣彼得堡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信