Integration of communicative and geographical approaches in media-ecological research (by the example of the analysis of the largest newspapers from Russia, China and Japan)

Ljudmila Kokhanova, Sergey B. Golovko, Eugeny Kharybin, Ulia Chereshneva, M. Gribok
{"title":"Integration of communicative and geographical approaches in media-ecological research (by the example of the analysis of the largest newspapers from Russia, China and Japan)","authors":"Ljudmila Kokhanova, Sergey B. Golovko, Eugeny Kharybin, Ulia Chereshneva, M. Gribok","doi":"10.35595/2414-9179-2022-1-28-255-265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article announces a new concept of media ecology as a scientific field of research within the framework of the paradigm of mediatization of the information space. The term “media ecology” is already used in science, but in a different conceptual meaning. The authors conducted its detuning from existing analogues at the terminological level, specified the field of scientific research of media ecology, designated its thematic field, defined methodological and theoretical bases and research tools. The possibility of using geographical and geoinformation research methods within the framework of the proposed concept is indicated. Examples of maps and geographical studies on media-ecological topics are given. The results of a pilot study on the analysis of empirical material by methods and tools of media ecology on the example of the largest newspaper publications of the three countries are also presented. These are “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” (edition of the Government of the Russian Federation), “Zhenmin Zhibao” (Publication of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China) and “Asahi Shimbun” (national newspaper of Japan). The study was conducted according to the method of communicative five-stage analysis with elements of comparative geographical analysis. The article contains an examination of the peculiarities of the environmental policy of the three countries, a comparative analysis of the format of publications and a frequency analysis of archives posted on the websites of publications. The authors also compared the traffic to the websites of publications and the average reading time of materials, analyzed the features of feedback and communication with readers. Conclusions are drawn about the degree of effectiveness of the communicative impact of the publications under consideration on the audience. The highest efficiency was found in the Japanese newspaper “Asahi Shimbun”, the average—in the “Russian newspaper”, and the lowest—in the Chinese “Zhenmin Zhibao”.","PeriodicalId":31498,"journal":{"name":"InterCarto InterGIS","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterCarto InterGIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2022-1-28-255-265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article announces a new concept of media ecology as a scientific field of research within the framework of the paradigm of mediatization of the information space. The term “media ecology” is already used in science, but in a different conceptual meaning. The authors conducted its detuning from existing analogues at the terminological level, specified the field of scientific research of media ecology, designated its thematic field, defined methodological and theoretical bases and research tools. The possibility of using geographical and geoinformation research methods within the framework of the proposed concept is indicated. Examples of maps and geographical studies on media-ecological topics are given. The results of a pilot study on the analysis of empirical material by methods and tools of media ecology on the example of the largest newspaper publications of the three countries are also presented. These are “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” (edition of the Government of the Russian Federation), “Zhenmin Zhibao” (Publication of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China) and “Asahi Shimbun” (national newspaper of Japan). The study was conducted according to the method of communicative five-stage analysis with elements of comparative geographical analysis. The article contains an examination of the peculiarities of the environmental policy of the three countries, a comparative analysis of the format of publications and a frequency analysis of archives posted on the websites of publications. The authors also compared the traffic to the websites of publications and the average reading time of materials, analyzed the features of feedback and communication with readers. Conclusions are drawn about the degree of effectiveness of the communicative impact of the publications under consideration on the audience. The highest efficiency was found in the Japanese newspaper “Asahi Shimbun”, the average—in the “Russian newspaper”, and the lowest—in the Chinese “Zhenmin Zhibao”.
媒介生态学研究中传播和地理方法的整合(以俄罗斯、中国和日本最大的报纸为例)
本文在信息空间媒介化范式的框架内提出了媒介生态学的新概念,作为一个科学的研究领域。“媒介生态学”一词已经在科学中使用,但具有不同的概念含义。作者从术语层面对媒介生态学进行了与现有类似物的疏离,明确了媒介生态学的科学研究领域,指定了媒介生态学的主题领域,明确了媒介生态学的方法论和理论基础以及研究工具。指出了在拟议概念的框架内使用地理和地理信息研究方法的可能性。给出了关于媒介生态主题的地图和地理研究的例子。本文还介绍了以三国最大的报纸出版物为例,利用媒介生态学的方法和工具对经验材料进行分析的试点研究结果。这些报纸分别是“俄罗斯联邦政府报”(Rossiyskaya Gazeta)、“中国共产党中央委员会出版物”(Zhenmin Zhibao)和“朝日新闻”(Asahi Shimbun)(日本全国性报纸)。本研究采用交际五阶段分析方法,结合比较地理分析的要素。本文对这三个国家环境政策的特点进行了考察,对出版物的格式进行了比较分析,并对出版物网站上发布的档案进行了频率分析。比较了出版物网站的访问量和资料的平均阅读时间,分析了与读者的反馈和交流的特点。得出结论,关于所考虑的出版物对受众的传播影响的有效性程度。效率最高的报纸是日本的《朝日新闻》,效率平均的是俄罗斯的《报纸》,效率最低的是中国的《人民知报》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信