Budgeting Efficiency in the Education System: Measuring the Effectiveness of Public and Private Schools

Yulia Fithriany Rahmah
{"title":"Budgeting Efficiency in the Education System: Measuring the Effectiveness of Public and Private Schools","authors":"Yulia Fithriany Rahmah","doi":"10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.3849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the efficiency of the education system and measures the effectiveness of public and private senior high schools in the city of Bandung. The samples for this study are 20 high schools in Bandung comprising 10 private schools and 10 public schools. A quantitative approach was utilized as the research design. The analytical tools used are multiple linear regression and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The results showed that private high schools were more efficient than public high schools in Bandung with an average efficiency rate of 91.49%. The achievements of high school students in the city of Bandung are influenced by the number of teachers, number of staff, number of students, school expenses, and graduate teachers, while the teacher's teaching experience does not affect student achievement. Our findings show that private schools are more efficient than public schools. Meanwhile, the amount of the cost of attending private schools is higher, and they tend to serve a smaller, more affluent population. These results highlight the need for policymakers to consider the trade-off between efficiency and equity when making educational funding and resource allocation decisions.","PeriodicalId":32470,"journal":{"name":"AlIshlah Jurnal Pendidikan","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlIshlah Jurnal Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.3849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the efficiency of the education system and measures the effectiveness of public and private senior high schools in the city of Bandung. The samples for this study are 20 high schools in Bandung comprising 10 private schools and 10 public schools. A quantitative approach was utilized as the research design. The analytical tools used are multiple linear regression and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The results showed that private high schools were more efficient than public high schools in Bandung with an average efficiency rate of 91.49%. The achievements of high school students in the city of Bandung are influenced by the number of teachers, number of staff, number of students, school expenses, and graduate teachers, while the teacher's teaching experience does not affect student achievement. Our findings show that private schools are more efficient than public schools. Meanwhile, the amount of the cost of attending private schools is higher, and they tend to serve a smaller, more affluent population. These results highlight the need for policymakers to consider the trade-off between efficiency and equity when making educational funding and resource allocation decisions.
教育系统的预算效率:衡量公立和私立学校的有效性
本文考察了万隆市教育系统的效率,并衡量了公立和私立高中的有效性。本研究的样本是万隆的20所高中,其中包括10所私立学校和10所公立学校。采用定量方法进行研究设计。分析工具是多元线性回归和数据包络分析(DEA)。结果表明,万隆市私立高中的效率高于公立高中,平均效率为91.49%。万隆市高中学生的学习成绩受教师人数、教职工人数、学生人数、学费和研究生教师的影响,而教师的教学经验对学生的学习成绩没有影响。我们的研究结果表明,私立学校比公立学校效率更高。与此同时,上私立学校的费用更高,而且他们往往服务于更小、更富裕的人群。这些结果突出表明,决策者在做出教育资金和资源分配决策时,需要考虑效率与公平之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
407
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书