Which Silvicultural Measures Are Recommended to Adapt Forests to Climate Change? A Literature Review

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
C. Coșofreț, L. Bouriaud
{"title":"Which Silvicultural Measures Are Recommended to Adapt Forests to Climate Change? A Literature Review","authors":"C. Coșofreț, L. Bouriaud","doi":"10.31926/but.fwiafe.2019.12.61.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change is a challenge for forest managers and owners. The trees regenerated in forest stands today will have to cope with changing conditions during their lifetime. Adaptive forest management includes a large variety of silvicultural measures: changes in species composition by converting monocultures to mixed forests, changes in forest structure, intensified thinning, or the reduction of rotation time. The aim of this review is to highlight the silvicultural measures and practices that have been recommended for adaptation to climate change, and to apply Bolte’s classification of adaptation strategies in order to identify which type of strategy is recommended in the literature. The literature review shows that active adaptation strategy tends to dominate as compared with passive adaptation or forest conservation measures. On the other hand, active adaptation with intensified thinning, shorter rotation periods, and change in the forest structure presents the risk of being rejected by a part of society for which climate change adaption should be a natural process. In addition, the current policy framework may limit the freedom of active adaptation measures.","PeriodicalId":38505,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series II: Forestry, Wood Industry, Agricultural Food Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series II: Forestry, Wood Industry, Agricultural Food Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31926/but.fwiafe.2019.12.61.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Climate change is a challenge for forest managers and owners. The trees regenerated in forest stands today will have to cope with changing conditions during their lifetime. Adaptive forest management includes a large variety of silvicultural measures: changes in species composition by converting monocultures to mixed forests, changes in forest structure, intensified thinning, or the reduction of rotation time. The aim of this review is to highlight the silvicultural measures and practices that have been recommended for adaptation to climate change, and to apply Bolte’s classification of adaptation strategies in order to identify which type of strategy is recommended in the literature. The literature review shows that active adaptation strategy tends to dominate as compared with passive adaptation or forest conservation measures. On the other hand, active adaptation with intensified thinning, shorter rotation periods, and change in the forest structure presents the risk of being rejected by a part of society for which climate change adaption should be a natural process. In addition, the current policy framework may limit the freedom of active adaptation measures.
建议采取哪些造林措施使森林适应气候变化?文献综述
气候变化是森林管理者和所有者面临的挑战。今天在森林中再生的树木在其一生中必须应对不断变化的环境。适应性森林管理包括各种各样的造林措施:通过将单一栽培转变为混交林来改变物种组成、改变森林结构、加强间伐或减少轮作时间。本综述的目的是突出推荐的适应气候变化的造林措施和实践,并应用Bolte的适应策略分类,以确定文献中推荐的策略类型。文献综述表明,与被动适应或森林保护措施相比,主动适应策略往往占主导地位。另一方面,随着间伐加剧、轮作周期缩短和森林结构变化的积极适应,可能会遭到社会中一部分人的拒绝,而对这些人来说,气候变化适应本应是一个自然过程。此外,目前的政策框架可能限制主动适应措施的自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信