Prognostic Impact of Ablative Therapy in Oligometastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Unresectable Primary Tumor

Garde-Noguera Javier, Marinelli Sara, Salvador-Coloma Carmen, Garcia-Sánchez José, Honrubia-Peris Beatriz, Escoin Corina, Piera Nuria, Juan-Vidal Oscar
{"title":"Prognostic Impact of Ablative Therapy in Oligometastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Unresectable Primary Tumor","authors":"Garde-Noguera Javier, Marinelli Sara, Salvador-Coloma Carmen, Garcia-Sánchez José, Honrubia-Peris Beatriz, Escoin Corina, Piera Nuria, Juan-Vidal Oscar","doi":"10.36959/825/583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Patients with Oligometastatic (OM) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (≤ 3 metastases) might benefit from radical ablative treatment of both primary tumor and metastases. However, the role of ablative therapy in OM patients with locally advance primary tumor has not been evaluated. The aim of our study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of ablative treatment in patients with unresectable primary tumor and synchronous Oligometastases, in terms of response rate, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods/Patients: Retrospective study of patients with Oligometastatic NSCLC (≤ 3 lesions in a unique location) and unresectable primary tumor, treated with radical intent (chemo-radiotherapy for primary tumor and surgery, radiotherapy, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) or radiofrequency for all known metastases) between October 2011 and March 2015. Results: Thirty patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 58 years, 76.6% were male, and 96.6% had ECOG 0-1. Histology: Adenocarcinoma (63.6%), squamous carcinoma (20%), and other histology (13.4%). All patients had unresectable primary tumor and/or mediastinal lymph nodes. Site of metastases: brain (46.6%), lung (23.3%), bone (20%), other locations (9.9%). Sequential thoracic radiotherapy (40%) and concomitant radiotherapy (60%). Treatment of metastases: SBRT (53.3%), external radiotherapy (26.6%), surgery (13.6%), radiofrequency (3.3%), none (3.3%). Toxicity grade 3 (29.4%). Response rate was 69.9%, median PFS 11.1 months (IC 95%: 8.2-13.7), and median OS 20.2 months (IC: 15.6-20.3). Conclusions: Radical treatment for oligometastatic and unresectable NSCLC patients is a safe therapeutic strategy and it could be contemplated as an effective therapeutic alternative in selected patients.","PeriodicalId":92751,"journal":{"name":"Annals of lung cancer","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/825/583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with Oligometastatic (OM) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (≤ 3 metastases) might benefit from radical ablative treatment of both primary tumor and metastases. However, the role of ablative therapy in OM patients with locally advance primary tumor has not been evaluated. The aim of our study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of ablative treatment in patients with unresectable primary tumor and synchronous Oligometastases, in terms of response rate, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods/Patients: Retrospective study of patients with Oligometastatic NSCLC (≤ 3 lesions in a unique location) and unresectable primary tumor, treated with radical intent (chemo-radiotherapy for primary tumor and surgery, radiotherapy, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) or radiofrequency for all known metastases) between October 2011 and March 2015. Results: Thirty patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 58 years, 76.6% were male, and 96.6% had ECOG 0-1. Histology: Adenocarcinoma (63.6%), squamous carcinoma (20%), and other histology (13.4%). All patients had unresectable primary tumor and/or mediastinal lymph nodes. Site of metastases: brain (46.6%), lung (23.3%), bone (20%), other locations (9.9%). Sequential thoracic radiotherapy (40%) and concomitant radiotherapy (60%). Treatment of metastases: SBRT (53.3%), external radiotherapy (26.6%), surgery (13.6%), radiofrequency (3.3%), none (3.3%). Toxicity grade 3 (29.4%). Response rate was 69.9%, median PFS 11.1 months (IC 95%: 8.2-13.7), and median OS 20.2 months (IC: 15.6-20.3). Conclusions: Radical treatment for oligometastatic and unresectable NSCLC patients is a safe therapeutic strategy and it could be contemplated as an effective therapeutic alternative in selected patients.
伴有不可切除原发肿瘤的少转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)消融治疗对预后的影响
目的:少转移(OM)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)(≤3个转移)患者可能从原发肿瘤和转移性肿瘤的根治性消融治疗中获益。然而,消融治疗在OM局部进展原发肿瘤患者中的作用尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是分析消融治疗在不可切除原发肿瘤和同步寡转移患者中的疗效和安全性,包括缓解率、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。方法/患者:回顾性研究2011年10月至2015年3月间接受根治性治疗(原发肿瘤化疗+手术、放疗、立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)或所有已知转移灶射频治疗)的少转移性非小细胞肺癌(独特位置≤3个病灶)和不可切除原发肿瘤患者。结果:30例患者符合纳入标准。中位年龄58岁,76.6%为男性,96.6%为ECOG 0-1。组织学:腺癌(63.6%),鳞状癌(20%),其他组织学(13.4%)。所有患者均有不可切除的原发肿瘤和/或纵隔淋巴结。转移部位:脑(46.6%)、肺(23.3%)、骨(20%)、其他部位(9.9%)。序贯胸部放疗(40%)和伴随放疗(60%)。转移治疗:SBRT(53.3%)、外放疗(26.6%)、手术(13.6%)、射频(3.3%)、无(3.3%)。毒性3级(29.4%)。缓解率为69.9%,中位PFS 11.1个月(IC 95%: 8.2-13.7),中位OS 20.2个月(IC: 15.6-20.3)。结论:对于少转移和不可切除的非小细胞肺癌患者,根治性治疗是一种安全的治疗策略,可以考虑在选定的患者中作为一种有效的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信