Written for the Moment

Q2 Arts and Humanities
J. S. Fulda
{"title":"Written for the Moment","authors":"J. S. Fulda","doi":"10.3172/JIE.21.1.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that the disclosure, dissemination, sale, and publication of text - such as text messages, e-mail's, and letters - addressed to anyone other than the public at large are gravely and profoundly immoral. The argument has two main strands, the first based on a conception of privacy largely due to Davis (2009) (but also to an earlier paper by Alfino), and the second based on the concept of authorial autonomy and its reverse, authorial dilution. The paper is an intersection between its main concern, ethics, and a secondary concern, the law keeping pace with ethics, specifically the law of copyright and the law of privacy.","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"21 1","pages":"21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.21.1.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article argues that the disclosure, dissemination, sale, and publication of text - such as text messages, e-mail's, and letters - addressed to anyone other than the public at large are gravely and profoundly immoral. The argument has two main strands, the first based on a conception of privacy largely due to Davis (2009) (but also to an earlier paper by Alfino), and the second based on the concept of authorial autonomy and its reverse, authorial dilution. The paper is an intersection between its main concern, ethics, and a secondary concern, the law keeping pace with ethics, specifically the law of copyright and the law of privacy.
为当下而写
这篇文章认为,披露、传播、销售和出版文本——比如短信、电子邮件和信件——给公众以外的任何人都是严重和极其不道德的。这个论点有两个主要方面,第一个是基于隐私的概念,这主要是由戴维斯(2009)提出的(但也来自阿尔菲诺(Alfino)早期的一篇论文),第二个是基于作者自治及其相反的作者稀释的概念。本文是其主要关注点伦理和次要关注点——与伦理保持同步的法律,特别是版权法和隐私权法之间的交叉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信