Acupuncture Treatment of Non-inflammatory Chronic Prostatitis with

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Zhang Aj, Y. He, F. Chen, H. Chen, B. Jiang, Zhang Gy, L. Guo, Shields Lh, Nielsen Lp
{"title":"Acupuncture Treatment of Non-inflammatory Chronic Prostatitis with","authors":"Zhang Aj, Y. He, F. Chen, H. Chen, B. Jiang, Zhang Gy, L. Guo, Shields Lh, Nielsen Lp","doi":"10.3727/036012921x16304136917609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of \"Tiao Shen Jie Yu\" acupuncture, conventional acupuncture, and tamsulosin to treat non-inflammatory chronic prostatitis (type IIIB CP). Methods: 105 patients were randomly divided into the \"Tiao Shen Jie Yu\" acupuncture group, conventional acupuncture group, and tamsulosin group, 35 cases in each group. In the \"Tiao Shen Jie Yu\" acupuncture group, PC6 (Neiguan), PC7 (Daling), HT7 (Shenmen), RN6 (Qihai), RN4 (Guanyuan), ST28 (Shuidao), ST36 (Zusanli), SP9 (Yinlingquan), SP6 (Sanyinjiao), and LR3 (Taichong) were selected; In the conventional acupuncture group, RN4 (Guanyuan), RN3 (Zhongji), KI3 (Taixi), SP6 (Sanyinjiao), BL54 (Zhibian) through ST28 (Shuidao), BL20 (Pishu), and BL23 (Shenshu) were set. Acupuncture was given once every other day, 30 minutes each time, three times a week, 12 times in a row as a course of treatment. Tamsulosin group took tamsulosin 0.2mg orally, once a day for four weeks. The three groups were observed for two methods. The NIH-CPSI total score, NIH-CPSI pain symptom score, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score, and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) score were compared among the three groups. After one course of treatment and after two methods of treatment, and the recurrence rate and clinical efficacy were evaluated. Results: The NIH-CPSI total score, NIH-CPSI pain symptom score, HAMD and HAMA scores of the three groups after one course of treatment and two courses of treatment were lower than those before treatment (all P<0.01). After one course of treatment and two courses of treatment, the total NIH-CPSI score, NIH-CPSI pain score, HAMD, and HAMA score in the \"Tiao Shen Jie Yu\" acupuncture group decreased more than those in the conventional acupuncture group and tamsulosin group (all P<0.05). The recurrence rate of the \"Tiao Shen Jie Yu\" acupuncture group was lower than that of the conventional acupuncture group and tamsulosin group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The total effective rates of the conventional acupuncture group and tamsulosin group were 78.13% (25/32) and 69.70% (23/33), respectively, which were lower than 97.06% (33/34) of the \"Tiao Shen Jie Yu\" acupuncture group. No severe adverse reactions occurred in the safety evaluation.Conclusion: The therapeutic effect of \"Tiao Shen Jie Yu\" Acupuncture on type III BCP is better than that of conventional acupuncture and tamsulosin, and it is better than that of traditional acupuncture and tamsulosin in relieving prostatitis symptoms, anxiety, and depression.","PeriodicalId":50881,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3727/036012921x16304136917609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of "Tiao Shen Jie Yu" acupuncture, conventional acupuncture, and tamsulosin to treat non-inflammatory chronic prostatitis (type IIIB CP). Methods: 105 patients were randomly divided into the "Tiao Shen Jie Yu" acupuncture group, conventional acupuncture group, and tamsulosin group, 35 cases in each group. In the "Tiao Shen Jie Yu" acupuncture group, PC6 (Neiguan), PC7 (Daling), HT7 (Shenmen), RN6 (Qihai), RN4 (Guanyuan), ST28 (Shuidao), ST36 (Zusanli), SP9 (Yinlingquan), SP6 (Sanyinjiao), and LR3 (Taichong) were selected; In the conventional acupuncture group, RN4 (Guanyuan), RN3 (Zhongji), KI3 (Taixi), SP6 (Sanyinjiao), BL54 (Zhibian) through ST28 (Shuidao), BL20 (Pishu), and BL23 (Shenshu) were set. Acupuncture was given once every other day, 30 minutes each time, three times a week, 12 times in a row as a course of treatment. Tamsulosin group took tamsulosin 0.2mg orally, once a day for four weeks. The three groups were observed for two methods. The NIH-CPSI total score, NIH-CPSI pain symptom score, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score, and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) score were compared among the three groups. After one course of treatment and after two methods of treatment, and the recurrence rate and clinical efficacy were evaluated. Results: The NIH-CPSI total score, NIH-CPSI pain symptom score, HAMD and HAMA scores of the three groups after one course of treatment and two courses of treatment were lower than those before treatment (all P<0.01). After one course of treatment and two courses of treatment, the total NIH-CPSI score, NIH-CPSI pain score, HAMD, and HAMA score in the "Tiao Shen Jie Yu" acupuncture group decreased more than those in the conventional acupuncture group and tamsulosin group (all P<0.05). The recurrence rate of the "Tiao Shen Jie Yu" acupuncture group was lower than that of the conventional acupuncture group and tamsulosin group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The total effective rates of the conventional acupuncture group and tamsulosin group were 78.13% (25/32) and 69.70% (23/33), respectively, which were lower than 97.06% (33/34) of the "Tiao Shen Jie Yu" acupuncture group. No severe adverse reactions occurred in the safety evaluation.Conclusion: The therapeutic effect of "Tiao Shen Jie Yu" Acupuncture on type III BCP is better than that of conventional acupuncture and tamsulosin, and it is better than that of traditional acupuncture and tamsulosin in relieving prostatitis symptoms, anxiety, and depression.
针刺治疗慢性非炎症性前列腺炎
目的:比较调肾解郁针刺、常规针刺、坦索罗辛治疗非炎症性慢性前列腺炎(IIIB型CP)的临床疗效。方法:105例患者随机分为调肾解郁针刺组、常规针刺组和坦索罗辛组,每组35例。“调肾解郁”针刺组选择PC6(内关)、PC7(大陵)、HT7(神门)、RN6(七海)、RN4(观园)、ST28(水岛)、ST36(足三里)、SP9(银灵泉)、SP6(三阴角)、LR3(太中);常规针刺组设置RN4(观源)、RN3(中基)、KI3(太溪)、SP6(三阴交)、BL54(直边)至ST28(水岛)、BL20(脾俞)、BL23(肾俞)。每隔一天针灸1次,每次30分钟,每周3次,连续12次为1个疗程。坦索罗辛组患者口服坦索罗辛0.2mg,每日1次,连用4周。三组采用两种方法进行观察。比较三组患者的NIH-CPSI总分、NIH-CPSI疼痛症状评分、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分。观察1个疗程及2种治疗方法后的复发率及临床疗效。结果:三组患者治疗1个疗程和2个疗程后的NIH-CPSI总分、NIH-CPSI疼痛症状评分、HAMD、HAMA评分均低于治疗前(均P<0.01)。经1个疗程和2个疗程治疗后,调参解俞针刺组患者的NIH-CPSI总分、NIH-CPSI疼痛评分、HAMD、HAMA评分下降幅度均大于常规针刺组和坦索罗辛组(均P<0.05)。调肾解郁针刺组复发率低于常规针刺组和坦索罗辛组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。常规针刺组和坦索罗辛组的总有效率分别为78.13%(25/32)和69.70%(23/33),均低于调神解郁针刺组的97.06%(33/34)。安全性评价中未发生严重不良反应。结论:调肾解郁针刺治疗III型BCP的疗效优于常规针刺加坦索罗辛,在缓解前列腺炎症状、焦虑、抑郁方面优于传统针刺加坦索罗辛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research
Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
66.70%
发文量
9
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide an international forum for the exchange of ideas and promotion of basic and clinical research in acupuncture, electro-therapeutics, and related fields. The journal was established in order to make acupuncture and electro-therapeutics a universally acceptable branch of medicine through multidisciplinary research based on scientific disciplines. The final goal is to provide a better understanding of both the beneficial and adverse effects of these treatments in order to supplement or improve existing methods of diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases in both Western and Oriental medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信