FORUM: THE MATERIAL TURN AND THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF RELIGION

Q3 Social Sciences
Evgeniia Abroskina, Yulia Antonyan, D. Baranov, V. Bobrovnikov, V. Fomina, Mansur Gasimzianov, E. Guchinova, Marina Hakkarainen, Natalia Kryukova, Art Leete, Mariе Masagutova, Igor Mikeshin, A. Panchenko, Danila Rygovskiy, Yu S Senina, Laur Vallikivi
{"title":"FORUM: THE MATERIAL TURN AND THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF RELIGION","authors":"Evgeniia Abroskina, Yulia Antonyan, D. Baranov, V. Bobrovnikov, V. Fomina, Mansur Gasimzianov, E. Guchinova, Marina Hakkarainen, Natalia Kryukova, Art Leete, Mariе Masagutova, Igor Mikeshin, A. Panchenko, Danila Rygovskiy, Yu S Senina, Laur Vallikivi","doi":"10.31250/1815-8870-2022-18-55-31-152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Material religion” as a research program is a relatively new development in the study of religion in the social sciences and humanities. Though this approach has its own forerunners and predecessors, one can argue that it took shape in the wake of an epistemological critique of social and cultural anthropology which treated religion as embedded in the cognitive and psychological experiences of a human being. Accordingly, the material manifestation of religion used to be treated as secondary, optional, and even superfluous. Criticism of this understanding of the nature of religion and of the methods of its studying focuses on the cultural and historical specificity of this approach originating from the use of Protestantism as a model for any religion. The material turn, in contrast, argues that spiritual experience is or at least can be studied as a derivation of bodily practices and experiences caused by the communication of a human with things, substances, images, sounds, fragrances, and flavours. Taken as integral parts of religious infrastructure, they constitute both the mundane and devotional life of an individual believer and of a religious community. This trend in social research remains unnoticed in Russian social science and humanities. The forum aims to assess the state of art in the field of material religion and discuss perspectives of its development. Participants in the discussion highlight the role of the materiality of things and substances, bodies, and mechanisms in their own research and what heuristic perspectives this material turn opens for them. A separate line of discussion concerns the prospects of grafting material religion to the classic models of social research, such as Marxist sociology.","PeriodicalId":52194,"journal":{"name":"Antropologicheskij Forum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antropologicheskij Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2022-18-55-31-152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Material religion” as a research program is a relatively new development in the study of religion in the social sciences and humanities. Though this approach has its own forerunners and predecessors, one can argue that it took shape in the wake of an epistemological critique of social and cultural anthropology which treated religion as embedded in the cognitive and psychological experiences of a human being. Accordingly, the material manifestation of religion used to be treated as secondary, optional, and even superfluous. Criticism of this understanding of the nature of religion and of the methods of its studying focuses on the cultural and historical specificity of this approach originating from the use of Protestantism as a model for any religion. The material turn, in contrast, argues that spiritual experience is or at least can be studied as a derivation of bodily practices and experiences caused by the communication of a human with things, substances, images, sounds, fragrances, and flavours. Taken as integral parts of religious infrastructure, they constitute both the mundane and devotional life of an individual believer and of a religious community. This trend in social research remains unnoticed in Russian social science and humanities. The forum aims to assess the state of art in the field of material religion and discuss perspectives of its development. Participants in the discussion highlight the role of the materiality of things and substances, bodies, and mechanisms in their own research and what heuristic perspectives this material turn opens for them. A separate line of discussion concerns the prospects of grafting material religion to the classic models of social research, such as Marxist sociology.
论坛:物质转向与宗教人类学
“物质宗教”作为一个研究项目,是社会科学和人文科学中宗教研究的一个相对较新的发展。虽然这种方法有自己的先行者和前辈,但人们可以认为,它是在对社会和文化人类学的认识论批判之后形成的,该人类学将宗教视为嵌入在人类的认知和心理经验中。因此,宗教的物质表现曾经被视为次要的、可选择的,甚至是多余的。对这种对宗教本质的理解及其研究方法的批评集中在这种方法的文化和历史特殊性上,这种方法源于将新教作为任何宗教的典范。相反,物质主义则认为,精神体验是或至少可以被研究为由人类与事物、物质、图像、声音、香味和味道的交流所引起的身体实践和体验的派生。作为宗教基础设施的组成部分,它们既构成了信徒个人的世俗生活,也构成了宗教团体的虔诚生活。这一社会研究趋势在俄罗斯社会科学和人文科学领域尚未引起重视。该论坛旨在评估物质宗教领域的现状,并讨论其发展前景。讨论的参与者强调了事物、物质、身体和机制的物质性在他们自己的研究中的作用,以及这些材料为他们打开了什么样的启发式视角。另一条讨论线涉及到将物质宗教嫁接到社会研究的经典模型(如马克思主义社会学)的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antropologicheskij Forum
Antropologicheskij Forum Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信