Transformaciones judiciales en el Ecuador: El equilibrio de poderes visto a través del análisis de redes sociales

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
E. Guerrero
{"title":"Transformaciones judiciales en el Ecuador: El equilibrio de poderes visto a través del análisis de redes sociales","authors":"E. Guerrero","doi":"10.31207/IH.V4I0.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text explores the balance of powers in the Republic of Ecuador through Social Network Analysis (SNA). It argues that formal and informal ties among political system’s actors can be affected as a result of an improvement action within a part of the State. The Article recounts three essential elements: the theoretical apparatus of the balance of power in the State, a summary of the reform actions in the Ecuadorian juridical system, and an analytical contrast between governance models of the Ecuadorian State after the reform of the judiciary, conducted between 2010 and 2014. For this purpose, a comparison of the models of balance by using social network analysis is proposed; thereof a series of statistics that will show the possibility of changes in the capabilities of horizontal accountability of the Judiciary are obtained.  This data show an evidence base that small changes in the fabric of government relations have extensive quantitative consequences on the balance of powers, and appear as heuristics of change in the dynamics of political power. It concludes indicating that reforms of the judicial system have created a more efficient system but, according to the obtained data, centrality of power can generate unwanted effects in public administration and in the structure of power control of the State.","PeriodicalId":40171,"journal":{"name":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","volume":"4 1","pages":"263-297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31207/IH.V4I0.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This text explores the balance of powers in the Republic of Ecuador through Social Network Analysis (SNA). It argues that formal and informal ties among political system’s actors can be affected as a result of an improvement action within a part of the State. The Article recounts three essential elements: the theoretical apparatus of the balance of power in the State, a summary of the reform actions in the Ecuadorian juridical system, and an analytical contrast between governance models of the Ecuadorian State after the reform of the judiciary, conducted between 2010 and 2014. For this purpose, a comparison of the models of balance by using social network analysis is proposed; thereof a series of statistics that will show the possibility of changes in the capabilities of horizontal accountability of the Judiciary are obtained.  This data show an evidence base that small changes in the fabric of government relations have extensive quantitative consequences on the balance of powers, and appear as heuristics of change in the dynamics of political power. It concludes indicating that reforms of the judicial system have created a more efficient system but, according to the obtained data, centrality of power can generate unwanted effects in public administration and in the structure of power control of the State.
厄瓜多尔的司法转型:通过社交网络分析看到的权力平衡
本文通过社会网络分析(SNA)探讨了厄瓜多尔共和国的权力平衡。它认为,政治制度行动者之间的正式和非正式关系可能由于国家一部分的改进行动而受到影响。本文叙述了三个基本要素:国家权力平衡的理论工具,厄瓜多尔司法系统改革行动的总结,以及2010年至2014年司法改革后厄瓜多尔国家治理模式的分析对比。为此,本文提出了一种基于社会网络分析的平衡模型的比较;由此得出一系列统计数字,显示司法机构横向问责的能力有可能发生变化。这些数据显示了一个证据基础,即政府关系结构的微小变化会对权力平衡产生广泛的定量影响,并表现为政治权力动态变化的启发式。报告的结论指出,司法制度的改革创造了一个更有效的制度,但是,根据所获得的数据,权力集中可能在公共行政和国家权力控制结构方面产生不必要的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信