Finding of the Relics of Adrian Poshekhonsky (1626): On a Possible Mystification

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Kazakov
{"title":"Finding of the Relics of Adrian Poshekhonsky (1626): On a Possible Mystification","authors":"A. Kazakov","doi":"10.31168/2305-6754.2022.11.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tragic death of hegumen Adrian, who was the founder of the Holy Assumption Adrian Monastery in Poshekhonye, and was killed by the peasants of Beloe village on 5 March 1550, received an unexpected continuation in connection with the discovery of Adrian’s relics. Despite the fact that a thorough investigation of the crime had been carried out, and the perpetrators of the attack on the monastery had been punished severely, the relics of hegumen Adrian were never found at that time. They were discovered only 76 years later. As is turned out, pious serfs secretly buried Adrian’s remains near an abandoned church on the banks of the Ukhra River. They also planted a rowan tree, which became the object of worship among the villagers. Shortly before Adrian's relics were discovered, a monastery was founded near the sacred rowan. The monastery’s founder, hegumen Lavrentiy, was the main initiator of the search for the relics. Probably, Lavrentiy wrote the Tale about Finding the Relics of Venerable Martyr Adrian, in which he described the events in detail. However, by careful analyses of the text of the curios, the author concludes that the relics discovered in 1626 might not belong to Adrian. This is indicated by certain points in the narrative, which suggests that hegumen Lavrentiy was inclined to wishful thinking. The fact of finding the relics seems to be indisputable, but their identification is doubtful. Probably, the discovered relics did not belong to Adrian, but to an unknown monk who once lived in the area.","PeriodicalId":42189,"journal":{"name":"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31168/2305-6754.2022.11.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tragic death of hegumen Adrian, who was the founder of the Holy Assumption Adrian Monastery in Poshekhonye, and was killed by the peasants of Beloe village on 5 March 1550, received an unexpected continuation in connection with the discovery of Adrian’s relics. Despite the fact that a thorough investigation of the crime had been carried out, and the perpetrators of the attack on the monastery had been punished severely, the relics of hegumen Adrian were never found at that time. They were discovered only 76 years later. As is turned out, pious serfs secretly buried Adrian’s remains near an abandoned church on the banks of the Ukhra River. They also planted a rowan tree, which became the object of worship among the villagers. Shortly before Adrian's relics were discovered, a monastery was founded near the sacred rowan. The monastery’s founder, hegumen Lavrentiy, was the main initiator of the search for the relics. Probably, Lavrentiy wrote the Tale about Finding the Relics of Venerable Martyr Adrian, in which he described the events in detail. However, by careful analyses of the text of the curios, the author concludes that the relics discovered in 1626 might not belong to Adrian. This is indicated by certain points in the narrative, which suggests that hegumen Lavrentiy was inclined to wishful thinking. The fact of finding the relics seems to be indisputable, but their identification is doubtful. Probably, the discovered relics did not belong to Adrian, but to an unknown monk who once lived in the area.
阿德里安·波舍孔斯基(1626)遗物的发现:关于可能的神秘化
hegumen Adrian是Poshekhonye的圣升天阿德里安修道院的创始人,于1550年3月5日被Beloe村的农民杀害,他的悲惨死亡与阿德里安遗物的发现有关,得到了意想不到的延续。尽管对这一罪行进行了彻底的调查,袭击修道院的肇事者也受到了严厉的惩罚,但赫古曼·阿德里安的遗物当时一直没有找到。它们在76年后才被发现。事实证明,虔诚的农奴秘密地将阿德里安的遗体埋在乌克拉河畔一座废弃的教堂附近。他们还种了一棵罗文树,成为村民们崇拜的对象。在阿德里安的遗物被发现前不久,在神圣的罗文附近建立了一座修道院。修道院的创始人hegumen Lavrentiy是寻找这些遗物的主要发起者。也许,拉夫连提写了《寻找可敬的殉道者阿德里安遗物的故事》,他在书中详细描述了这些事件。然而,通过对古玩文字的仔细分析,作者得出结论,1626年发现的文物可能不属于阿德里安。叙述中的某些点表明了这一点,这表明他倾向于一厢情愿的想法。发现这些文物的事实似乎是无可争辩的,但它们的身份却令人怀疑。发现的文物可能不属于阿德里安,而是曾经住在该地区的一位不知名的僧侣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies
Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal Slověne = Словѣне is a periodical focusing on the fields of the arts and humanities. In accordance with the standards of humanities periodicals aimed at the development of national philological traditions in a broad cultural and academic context, the Journal Slověne = Словѣне is multilingual but with a focus on papers in English. The Journal Slověne = Словѣне is intended for the exchange of information between Russian scholars and leading universities and research centers throughout the world and for their further professional integration into the international academic community through a shared focus on Slavic studies. The target audience of the journal is Slavic philologists and scholars in related disciplines (historians, cultural anthropologists, sociologists, specialists in comparative and religious studies, etc.) and related fields (Byzantinists, Germanists, Hebraists, Turkologists, Finno-Ugrists, etc.). The periodical has a pronounced interdisciplinary character and publishes papers from the widest linguistic, philological, and historico-cultural range: there are studies of linguistic typology, pragmalinguistics, computer and applied linguistics, etymology, onomastics, epigraphy, ethnolinguistics, dialectology, folkloristics, Biblical studies, history of science, palaeoslavistics, history of Slavic literatures, Slavs in the context of foreign languages, non-Slavic languages and dialects in the Slavic context, and historical linguistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信