Modern methods for the determination of pesticide residues in beekeeping products and for the diagnostics of bee poisoning

Y. Omelchun, A. Kobish
{"title":"Modern methods for the determination of pesticide residues in beekeeping products and for the diagnostics of bee poisoning","authors":"Y. Omelchun, A. Kobish","doi":"10.33245/2310-4902-2022-176-2-101-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intensification of agricultural production is associated with the use of a significant amount of pesticides, which negatively affects the environment and human health, and food products, including beekeeping products, accordingly require mandatory control of residual amounts of pesticides. This article provides a comparative analysis of the available chromatographic methods for pesticide residue research. The necessity of using modern chromatographic methods to determine residual amounts of pesticides in samples of dead bees and beekeeping products is well-founded. Chromatographic methods of studying these indicators in different types of matrices are a priority. They are effective methods of analysis, widely used due to their versatility - they allow the analysis of complex inorganic and organic compounds in various aggregate states. But one of the most common modern methods for pesticide determination is gas and liquid three-quadrupole tandem chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC and/or LC-MS/MS). The GC-MS/MS method provides quantitative determination of analytes at a level that is an order of magnitude higher than, for example, the gas single quadrupole mass spectrometry method. Modern methods of gas and liquid chromatography in combination with quadrupoletime-of-flight mass spectrometric detection (LC/Q-TOF/MS or GC/ Q-TOF/MS) also allow qualitative and quantitative multicomponent analysis of pesticides in beekeeping products. GC and LC systems combined with high-resolution Orbitrap MS (GC-HRMS(Q-Orbitrap)/LC-HRMS (Q-Orbitrap)) have higher sensitivity, enabling ultra-trace detection, and are the most sensitive screening method for multicomponent determination of pesticide residues. Thus, the latest chromatographic methods are able to meet the needs of analytical testing and research laboratories in the field of food safety, including beekeeping products.\nKey words: chromatographic methods, thin-layer chromatography, gas chromatography, liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, multi-component analysis, pesticides, honey, dead bees.","PeriodicalId":34230,"journal":{"name":"Naukovii visnik veterinarnoyi meditsini","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovii visnik veterinarnoyi meditsini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33245/2310-4902-2022-176-2-101-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensification of agricultural production is associated with the use of a significant amount of pesticides, which negatively affects the environment and human health, and food products, including beekeeping products, accordingly require mandatory control of residual amounts of pesticides. This article provides a comparative analysis of the available chromatographic methods for pesticide residue research. The necessity of using modern chromatographic methods to determine residual amounts of pesticides in samples of dead bees and beekeeping products is well-founded. Chromatographic methods of studying these indicators in different types of matrices are a priority. They are effective methods of analysis, widely used due to their versatility - they allow the analysis of complex inorganic and organic compounds in various aggregate states. But one of the most common modern methods for pesticide determination is gas and liquid three-quadrupole tandem chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC and/or LC-MS/MS). The GC-MS/MS method provides quantitative determination of analytes at a level that is an order of magnitude higher than, for example, the gas single quadrupole mass spectrometry method. Modern methods of gas and liquid chromatography in combination with quadrupoletime-of-flight mass spectrometric detection (LC/Q-TOF/MS or GC/ Q-TOF/MS) also allow qualitative and quantitative multicomponent analysis of pesticides in beekeeping products. GC and LC systems combined with high-resolution Orbitrap MS (GC-HRMS(Q-Orbitrap)/LC-HRMS (Q-Orbitrap)) have higher sensitivity, enabling ultra-trace detection, and are the most sensitive screening method for multicomponent determination of pesticide residues. Thus, the latest chromatographic methods are able to meet the needs of analytical testing and research laboratories in the field of food safety, including beekeeping products. Key words: chromatographic methods, thin-layer chromatography, gas chromatography, liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, multi-component analysis, pesticides, honey, dead bees.
养蜂产品中农药残留量测定和蜜蜂中毒诊断的现代方法
农业生产的集约化与大量农药的使用有关,这对环境和人类健康产生了负面影响,因此,食品,包括养蜂产品,要求对农药残留量进行强制性控制。本文对农药残留研究中常用的色谱方法进行了比较分析。使用现代色谱法测定死蜂和养蜂产品样品中农药残留量的必要性是有充分根据的。在不同类型的基质中研究这些指标的色谱方法是当务之急。它们是有效的分析方法,由于其通用性而被广泛使用-它们允许分析各种聚集状态的复杂无机和有机化合物。但最常用的现代农药测定方法之一是气液三-四极杆串联色谱-质谱法(GC和/或LC-MS/MS)。GC-MS/MS方法提供的分析物的定量测定水平比例如气体单四极杆质谱法高一个数量级。气相色谱和液相色谱结合四极杆飞行时间质谱检测(LC/Q-TOF/MS或GC/ Q-TOF/MS)的现代方法也允许对养蜂产品中的农药进行定性和定量的多组分分析。GC和LC系统结合高分辨率Orbitrap MS(GC- hrms (Q-Orbitrap)/LC- hrms (Q-Orbitrap))具有更高的灵敏度,可实现超痕量检测,是农药残留多组分测定中最灵敏的筛选方法。因此,最新的色谱方法能够满足包括养蜂产品在内的食品安全领域的分析测试和研究实验室的需求。关键词:色谱方法,薄层色谱,气相色谱,液相色谱,质谱,多组分分析,农药,蜂蜜,死蜂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信