The Commentary Literature on Maṣābīḥ al-Sunnah Abstract

Q4 Arts and Humanities
M. Y. Akbas
{"title":"The Commentary Literature on Maṣābīḥ al-Sunnah Abstract","authors":"M. Y. Akbas","doi":"10.33227/auifd.978373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Al-Farrāʾ al-Baghawī's (d. 516/1122) hadith compilation named Maṣābīḥ al-Sunnah has been attracted attention since the day it was written and has been read in madrasahs and ḥadith schools in different societies. As a result of this interest, many commentaries were written on the book in different periods. Studies listing al-Maṣābīḥ commentaries mostly contain repetition of each other and complicated information. This is because researchers use only the information in books and library catalogues. In addition, there is not much information about the characteristics of the commentaries. In this article, al-Maṣābīḥ commentaries are determined, analyzed, and evaluated by considering their common and different aspects. For this, first of all, only the list of commentaries is presented, and without introducing the authors and their works, sources are cited because of the limited scope of this paper. Additionally, in the case of disagreements about the author and the work, these are also mentioned. In this article, 25 commentaries of al-Maṣābīḥ that have survived to the present day have been identified, and along with the 6 published commentaries, 19 commentaries in manuscript form are listed. It has been determined that 4 commentaries mentioned in the sources are missing, and 11 commentaries that cannot be confirmed by external information are attributed only to their authors. While evaluating the commentaries, a comparison was made by taking into account the region and period in which the authors lived and their scientific personalities. Afterwards, the characteristics of the commentaries are examined, and it is tried to draw attention to the common and special aspects of the commentaries. Additionally, the main commentaries of al-Maṣābīḥ and other commentaries that benefited from them have been determined. Commentaries containing special information have also been touched on. The scholars and works on which the commentators based on their interpretations are examined under the heading of sources and interaction. Also, in this section, the extent to which the commentaries of al-Maṣābīḥ are sources for each other and the following works have been examined. At the end of the article, basic information about the commentaries of Maṣābīḥ al-Sunnah has been added as a table.","PeriodicalId":36545,"journal":{"name":"Ankara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ankara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33227/auifd.978373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Al-Farrāʾ al-Baghawī's (d. 516/1122) hadith compilation named Maṣābīḥ al-Sunnah has been attracted attention since the day it was written and has been read in madrasahs and ḥadith schools in different societies. As a result of this interest, many commentaries were written on the book in different periods. Studies listing al-Maṣābīḥ commentaries mostly contain repetition of each other and complicated information. This is because researchers use only the information in books and library catalogues. In addition, there is not much information about the characteristics of the commentaries. In this article, al-Maṣābīḥ commentaries are determined, analyzed, and evaluated by considering their common and different aspects. For this, first of all, only the list of commentaries is presented, and without introducing the authors and their works, sources are cited because of the limited scope of this paper. Additionally, in the case of disagreements about the author and the work, these are also mentioned. In this article, 25 commentaries of al-Maṣābīḥ that have survived to the present day have been identified, and along with the 6 published commentaries, 19 commentaries in manuscript form are listed. It has been determined that 4 commentaries mentioned in the sources are missing, and 11 commentaries that cannot be confirmed by external information are attributed only to their authors. While evaluating the commentaries, a comparison was made by taking into account the region and period in which the authors lived and their scientific personalities. Afterwards, the characteristics of the commentaries are examined, and it is tried to draw attention to the common and special aspects of the commentaries. Additionally, the main commentaries of al-Maṣābīḥ and other commentaries that benefited from them have been determined. Commentaries containing special information have also been touched on. The scholars and works on which the commentators based on their interpretations are examined under the heading of sources and interaction. Also, in this section, the extent to which the commentaries of al-Maṣābīḥ are sources for each other and the following works have been examined. At the end of the article, basic information about the commentaries of Maṣābīḥ al-Sunnah has been added as a table.
关于Maṣābīḥ圣训的评论文献摘要
al- farrna - al- baghawi(公元516/1122年)的圣训汇编Maṣābīḥ al-Sunnah自撰写之日起就引起了人们的注意,并在不同社会的伊斯兰学校和ḥadith学校中被阅读。由于这种兴趣,在不同时期对这本书写了许多评论。列出al-Maṣābīḥ评论的研究大多包含相互重复和复杂的信息。这是因为研究人员只使用书籍和图书馆目录中的信息。此外,关于评注的特点也没有太多的信息。在本文中,al-Maṣābīḥ评论是通过考虑它们的共同和不同方面来确定、分析和评估的。为此,首先只给出了评注的列表,由于本文的范围有限,没有介绍作者及其作品,引用了出处。此外,在对作者和作品有分歧的情况下,也会提到这些。在本文中,已经确定了al-Maṣābīḥ现存的25个注释,并与6个已发表的注释一起,列出了19个手稿形式的注释。经确定,资料来源中提到的4条评注缺失,11条无法得到外部信息证实的评注仅归其作者所有。在评价这些评论时,考虑了作者生活的地区和时期以及他们的科学个性,进行了比较。然后,考察了评注的特点,并试图引起人们对评注的共同和特殊方面的注意。此外,还确定了al-Maṣābīḥ的主要评论以及从中受益的其他评论。载有特别资料的评注也被提及。在“来源和相互作用”的标题下,评注者根据其解释所依据的学者和作品进行了审查。此外,在本节中,对al-Maṣābīḥ的评论在多大程度上是彼此的来源以及以下作品进行了检查。在文章的最后,关于Maṣābīḥ al-Sunnah评论的基本信息以表格的形式添加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ankara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi
Ankara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信