Is getting a PhD basically 'project management'? Rethinking qualifying strategies for early career researchers

Sarah Weber
{"title":"Is getting a PhD basically 'project management'? Rethinking qualifying strategies for early career researchers","authors":"Sarah Weber","doi":"10.3217/zfhe-11-05/06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Project-orientation and management logics in science have fundamentally altered research and scientific careers. This article contributes to ongoing research about early career researchers’ self-definition as ‘24-hour scientists’ and deals with their involvement in processes of self-precarisation. It focuses on qualifying strategies and soft-skills training for scholars. These training programs and advice often encompass so-called key competences for scholars, such as time and self-management. I argue that it is time to redefine the criteria for successfully completing a PhD by breaking with management rhetoric. 30.09.2016 | Sarah Weber (Karlsruhe)","PeriodicalId":30058,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Hochschulentwicklung","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Hochschulentwicklung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-11-05/06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Project-orientation and management logics in science have fundamentally altered research and scientific careers. This article contributes to ongoing research about early career researchers’ self-definition as ‘24-hour scientists’ and deals with their involvement in processes of self-precarisation. It focuses on qualifying strategies and soft-skills training for scholars. These training programs and advice often encompass so-called key competences for scholars, such as time and self-management. I argue that it is time to redefine the criteria for successfully completing a PhD by breaking with management rhetoric. 30.09.2016 | Sarah Weber (Karlsruhe)
获得博士学位基本上就是“项目管理”吗?重新思考早期职业研究人员的资格策略
科学中的项目导向和管理逻辑从根本上改变了研究和科学事业。本文对正在进行的关于早期职业研究人员自我定义为“24小时科学家”的研究做出了贡献,并处理了他们参与自我不稳定过程的问题。它侧重于学者的资格策略和软技能培训。这些培训项目和建议通常包括所谓的学者关键能力,比如时间和自我管理。我认为,现在是时候打破管理学的花言巧语,重新定义成功完成博士学位的标准了。30.09.2016 |莎拉·韦伯(卡尔斯鲁厄)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信