Study of Cerebro-Placental Ratio in Pregnancies with Abnormal Umbilical Artery Doppler in Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcome: Are we here yet?

Sunanda Bharatnur, C. Rani, S. Hebbar
{"title":"Study of Cerebro-Placental Ratio in Pregnancies with Abnormal Umbilical Artery Doppler in Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcome: Are we here yet?","authors":"Sunanda Bharatnur, C. Rani, S. Hebbar","doi":"10.29011/jpch-118.100018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the effect of abnormal Umbilical artery Doppler and Cerebro-placental ratio on perinatal outcome in pregnant women between 28-40 weeks of gestation. Methods: It’s a prospective observational study of 139 pregnant women with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler and cerebroplacental ratio from 28-40wks excluding all medical diseases. Doppler was considered abnormal when pulsatality Index (PI) > 95th percentile for gestational age and when Cerebro-placental Ratio is less than 1.08. Results: Abnormal Doppler results are grouped into 3 groups, AEDF (absent end diastolic factor), REDF (reverse end diastolic factor), CPR (cerebro-placental ratio) <1. In AEDF, REDF, CPR groups, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) was noted in73%, 95%, 37%. Low Apgar (score less than 7), was 4.5%, 35%, 3.1%.FGR was noted in 37%, 81%, 15%. Birth weight < 2.5kg as seen in 32%, 45% whereas in REDF group 95% of babies were <2kg.Sepsis were noted more in REDF 70% whereas none in CPR group. Meconium stained amniotic fluid seen in 13%, 10% and none in CPR group. All babies required NICU stay more than 7 days in REDFcompared to other groups. Perinatal mortality was highest in the REDF (15 %) compared to AEDF (2.29 %) and CPR <1.08 (Zero) [p <0.001]. Conclusion: Abnormal umbilical artery Doppler along with CPR <1 is associated with substantial risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Abnormal CPR and AEDF are not the indications for immediate delivery. Using Dopplers of other vessels like ductus venosus with UAAEDF could help in deciding the time of delivery and reduce the adverse perinatal outcome.","PeriodicalId":87313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pregnancy and child health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pregnancy and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/jpch-118.100018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of abnormal Umbilical artery Doppler and Cerebro-placental ratio on perinatal outcome in pregnant women between 28-40 weeks of gestation. Methods: It’s a prospective observational study of 139 pregnant women with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler and cerebroplacental ratio from 28-40wks excluding all medical diseases. Doppler was considered abnormal when pulsatality Index (PI) > 95th percentile for gestational age and when Cerebro-placental Ratio is less than 1.08. Results: Abnormal Doppler results are grouped into 3 groups, AEDF (absent end diastolic factor), REDF (reverse end diastolic factor), CPR (cerebro-placental ratio) <1. In AEDF, REDF, CPR groups, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) was noted in73%, 95%, 37%. Low Apgar (score less than 7), was 4.5%, 35%, 3.1%.FGR was noted in 37%, 81%, 15%. Birth weight < 2.5kg as seen in 32%, 45% whereas in REDF group 95% of babies were <2kg.Sepsis were noted more in REDF 70% whereas none in CPR group. Meconium stained amniotic fluid seen in 13%, 10% and none in CPR group. All babies required NICU stay more than 7 days in REDFcompared to other groups. Perinatal mortality was highest in the REDF (15 %) compared to AEDF (2.29 %) and CPR <1.08 (Zero) [p <0.001]. Conclusion: Abnormal umbilical artery Doppler along with CPR <1 is associated with substantial risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Abnormal CPR and AEDF are not the indications for immediate delivery. Using Dopplers of other vessels like ductus venosus with UAAEDF could help in deciding the time of delivery and reduce the adverse perinatal outcome.
脐动脉多普勒异常妊娠的脑胎盘比预测围产期不良结局的研究:我们还在这里吗?
目的:探讨脐动脉多普勒及脑胎盘比值异常对28 ~ 40周孕妇围产期结局的影响。方法:对139例28 ~ 40周脐动脉多普勒及脑胎盘比值异常孕妇进行前瞻性观察研究,排除所有内科疾病。当脉搏指数(PI)为胎龄第95百分位,脑胎盘比小于1.08时,多普勒诊断为异常。结果:多普勒异常分为3组,AEDF(舒张末期因子缺失)、REDF(舒张末期因子逆转)、CPR(脑胎盘比)<1。在AEDF、REDF、CPR组中,呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)发生率分别为73%、95%、37%。低Apgar(评分低于7分)分别为4.5%、35%、3.1%。FGR分别为37%,81%,15%。32%的婴儿出生体重小于2.5公斤,45%的婴儿出生体重小于2公斤,而REDF组95%的婴儿出生体重小于2公斤。REDF组败血症发生率为70%,而CPR组无。胎粪染色羊水13%,10%,CPR组无。与其他组相比,所有婴儿都需要在redf的新生儿重症监护病房停留7天以上。REDF组围产期死亡率最高(15%),AEDF组为2.29%,CPR组<1.08 (0)[p <0.001]。结论:脐动脉多普勒异常伴CPR <1与围产期不良结局的重大风险相关。异常CPR和AEDF不是立即分娩的指征。使用多普勒其他血管如静脉导管与UAAEDF可以帮助确定分娩时间和减少不良围产期结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信