Assessment by portfolio in a physiotherapy programme

A. Heijne, B. Nordgren, M. Hagströmer, C. Fridén
{"title":"Assessment by portfolio in a physiotherapy programme","authors":"A. Heijne, B. Nordgren, M. Hagströmer, C. Fridén","doi":"10.3109/14038196.2012.661458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the paper is to describe the introduction of a portfolio method of teaching and learning, and to describe students’ perceptions of the method as well as a peer-review system in a course, in the physiotherapy programme, at the Karolinska Institutet. A further aim was to describe the level of grades over time. A modified form of a showcase portfolio method together with a three-graded assessment criteria was introduced into the course. Students, over five semesters, were included in the project (n = 287) of which 91% answered questions and statements regarding their perception of the assessment method and the peer-review system. All portfolios were graded in a scale of three: fail, pass and pass with distinction. The majority of students were satisfied and reported positive learning effects with the assessment method and review system. However, the students asked for more guidance in how to give feedback. During these five semesters, the percentage of students that passed with distinction increased and the percentage of students that failed decreased. Three years after implementing the portfolio, our impression is that the method encourages students to take a more active part in learning and leads to a deeper approach to knowledge.","PeriodicalId":87870,"journal":{"name":"Advances in physiotherapy","volume":"14 1","pages":"38 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14038196.2012.661458","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2012.661458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to describe the introduction of a portfolio method of teaching and learning, and to describe students’ perceptions of the method as well as a peer-review system in a course, in the physiotherapy programme, at the Karolinska Institutet. A further aim was to describe the level of grades over time. A modified form of a showcase portfolio method together with a three-graded assessment criteria was introduced into the course. Students, over five semesters, were included in the project (n = 287) of which 91% answered questions and statements regarding their perception of the assessment method and the peer-review system. All portfolios were graded in a scale of three: fail, pass and pass with distinction. The majority of students were satisfied and reported positive learning effects with the assessment method and review system. However, the students asked for more guidance in how to give feedback. During these five semesters, the percentage of students that passed with distinction increased and the percentage of students that failed decreased. Three years after implementing the portfolio, our impression is that the method encourages students to take a more active part in learning and leads to a deeper approach to knowledge.
物理治疗项目组合评估
本文的目的是描述一种教学和学习的组合方法的介绍,并描述学生对该方法的看法,以及在卡罗林斯卡学院物理治疗项目课程中的同行评议系统。进一步的目的是描述一段时间内的成绩水平。在课程中引入了一种改进形式的展示作品集方法和三级评估标准。五个学期的学生被纳入该项目(n = 287),其中91%的学生回答了关于他们对评估方法和同行评议系统的看法的问题和陈述。所有的作品集都被分为三个等级:不及格、及格和优异及格。大多数学生对评估方法和复习制度感到满意,并报告了积极的学习效果。然而,学生们要求在如何给出反馈方面得到更多的指导。在这五个学期里,优等生的比例增加了,不及格学生的比例下降了。实施档案袋三年后,我们的印象是,这种方法鼓励学生更积极地参与学习,并导致更深入的知识途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信