Clinical evaluation of muscle function, quality of life and functional capacity after shoulder surgery

S. Augustsson, I. H. Klintberg, U. Svantesson, N. Sernert
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of muscle function, quality of life and functional capacity after shoulder surgery","authors":"S. Augustsson, I. H. Klintberg, U. Svantesson, N. Sernert","doi":"10.3109/14038196.2012.660988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to analyse and describe muscle function, quality of life and functional capacity before and after shoulder instability surgery. Twenty-six women aged 34 (± 14) years and 95 men aged 32 (± 10) years participated in this study. All patients were on the waiting list or had undergone shoulder instability surgery. The study was performed with a cross-sectional design and patients were examined pre-operatively, 6-month post-operatively or 7-year post-operatively. Handgrip strength measurement, active range of motion (AROM), isometric shoulder muscle strength measurement, health-related quality of life measured by Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI©) and shoulder function using the Constant Score were evaluated. The mean AROM in flexion for women in all groups ranged from 162° (± 16) to 169° (± 12), and for men from 157° (± 19) to 162° (± 12). The mean AROM in abduction ranged from 170° (± 25) to 177°(± 5) for women and from 177° (± 8) to 179° (± 24) for men. The mean AROM in external rotation ranged from 89° (± 14) to 95° (± 14) for women and from 83° (± 21) to 85° (± 12) for men. Men were significantly stronger and had a larger AROM on the non-injured side compared with the injured side, whereas differences were found between non-injured and injured side for women only in AROM. The scores from the WOSI© for all the patients were far from normative values suggesting that the patient's subjective experience does not fully reflect the physical examination. The results from the present study can guide the physiotherapist to give patients realistic expectations of shoulder function concerning AROM and muscle strength.","PeriodicalId":87870,"journal":{"name":"Advances in physiotherapy","volume":"14 1","pages":"29 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14038196.2012.660988","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2012.660988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyse and describe muscle function, quality of life and functional capacity before and after shoulder instability surgery. Twenty-six women aged 34 (± 14) years and 95 men aged 32 (± 10) years participated in this study. All patients were on the waiting list or had undergone shoulder instability surgery. The study was performed with a cross-sectional design and patients were examined pre-operatively, 6-month post-operatively or 7-year post-operatively. Handgrip strength measurement, active range of motion (AROM), isometric shoulder muscle strength measurement, health-related quality of life measured by Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI©) and shoulder function using the Constant Score were evaluated. The mean AROM in flexion for women in all groups ranged from 162° (± 16) to 169° (± 12), and for men from 157° (± 19) to 162° (± 12). The mean AROM in abduction ranged from 170° (± 25) to 177°(± 5) for women and from 177° (± 8) to 179° (± 24) for men. The mean AROM in external rotation ranged from 89° (± 14) to 95° (± 14) for women and from 83° (± 21) to 85° (± 12) for men. Men were significantly stronger and had a larger AROM on the non-injured side compared with the injured side, whereas differences were found between non-injured and injured side for women only in AROM. The scores from the WOSI© for all the patients were far from normative values suggesting that the patient's subjective experience does not fully reflect the physical examination. The results from the present study can guide the physiotherapist to give patients realistic expectations of shoulder function concerning AROM and muscle strength.
肩部手术后肌肉功能、生活质量及功能能力的临床评价
本研究的目的是分析和描述肩部不稳定手术前后的肌肉功能、生活质量和功能能力。年龄34(±14)岁的女性26例,年龄32(±10)岁的男性95例。所有患者都在等待名单上或接受过肩部不稳定手术。研究采用横断面设计,术前、术后6个月或术后7年对患者进行检查。对握力测量、主动活动范围(AROM)、肩肌力量等长测量、西安大略肩部不稳定指数(WOSI©)测量的健康相关生活质量和使用Constant Score测量的肩部功能进行评估。所有组中女性屈曲的平均AROM范围为162°(±16)至169°(±12),男性为157°(±19)至162°(±12)。女性外展时的平均AROM为170°(±25)至177°(±5),男性为177°(±8)至179°(±24)。女性外旋时的平均AROM为89°(±14)至95°(±14),男性为83°(±21)至85°(±12)。与受伤侧相比,男性明显更强壮,未受伤侧的AROM更大,而女性的AROM仅在未受伤侧和受伤侧之间存在差异。所有患者的WOSI©评分均与正常值相差甚远,说明患者的主观体验并不能完全反映体检结果。本研究的结果可以指导物理治疗师在AROM和肌肉力量方面给予患者切合实际的肩功能期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信