Physiotherapists' experience of client participation in physiotherapy interventions: A phenomenographic study

I. Larsson, Kerstin Liljedahl, G. Gard
{"title":"Physiotherapists' experience of client participation in physiotherapy interventions: A phenomenographic study","authors":"I. Larsson, Kerstin Liljedahl, G. Gard","doi":"10.3109/14038196.2010.497543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the study was to describe, using qualitative phenomenographic interviews, how physiotherapists experience client participation in physiotherapy interventions. The objective of phenomenographic research is to identify and describe various ways of experiencing the investigated phenomenon. Eleven respondents were strategically selected according to the maximum variation strategy with variations in: gender, seniority and areas of physiotherapy. Three qualitatively different descriptive categories were indentified with critical variations in paradigms of health and goal-setting procedures – A: Collaboration, i.e. an experience of client participation from a biopsychosocial collaborative view of intervention in which the client enter into equal partnership with the physiotherapist and thereby are jointly responsible for intervention, goal-setting and outcome; B: Guidance, i.e. an experience of client participation from a guided biomedical view of intervention, in which the client is guided by the physiotherapist in an unequal partnership in intervention and goal-setting; and C: Expertise, i.e. an experience of client participation from a paternalistic, biomedical view of intervention, in which the client sees the physiotherapist as an expert, who decides and controls the intervention and goal-setting. The results have made some earlier tacit professional physiotherapy knowledge explicit and may increase the understanding of how different experiences of client participation influence interventions.","PeriodicalId":87870,"journal":{"name":"Advances in physiotherapy","volume":"12 1","pages":"217 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14038196.2010.497543","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2010.497543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the study was to describe, using qualitative phenomenographic interviews, how physiotherapists experience client participation in physiotherapy interventions. The objective of phenomenographic research is to identify and describe various ways of experiencing the investigated phenomenon. Eleven respondents were strategically selected according to the maximum variation strategy with variations in: gender, seniority and areas of physiotherapy. Three qualitatively different descriptive categories were indentified with critical variations in paradigms of health and goal-setting procedures – A: Collaboration, i.e. an experience of client participation from a biopsychosocial collaborative view of intervention in which the client enter into equal partnership with the physiotherapist and thereby are jointly responsible for intervention, goal-setting and outcome; B: Guidance, i.e. an experience of client participation from a guided biomedical view of intervention, in which the client is guided by the physiotherapist in an unequal partnership in intervention and goal-setting; and C: Expertise, i.e. an experience of client participation from a paternalistic, biomedical view of intervention, in which the client sees the physiotherapist as an expert, who decides and controls the intervention and goal-setting. The results have made some earlier tacit professional physiotherapy knowledge explicit and may increase the understanding of how different experiences of client participation influence interventions.
物理治疗师对客户参与物理治疗干预的经验:一项现象研究
摘要本研究的目的是描述,使用定性现象访谈,物理治疗师如何体验客户参与物理治疗干预。现象学研究的目的是识别和描述体验被调查现象的各种方式。根据最大变异策略选择11名受访者,变异包括:性别、年资和物理治疗领域。确定了三个质量不同的描述类别,这些类别在健康和目标设定程序范例方面存在重大差异——A:合作,即从生物心理社会合作的角度看待干预,即客户与物理治疗师建立平等的伙伴关系,从而共同负责干预、目标设定和结果;B:指导,即从有指导的生物医学干预观点出发的来访者参与体验,其中来访者在干预和目标设定方面由物理治疗师以不平等的伙伴关系进行指导;C:专业知识,即客户从家长式的、生物医学的干预角度参与的经验,其中客户将物理治疗师视为专家,决定和控制干预和目标设定。研究结果明确了一些早期隐性的专业物理治疗知识,并可能增加对不同客户参与经验如何影响干预的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信