Vaccine Diplomacy and Vaccine Nationalism

Q1 Arts and Humanities
A. V. Kirgizov-Barskii, V. Morozov
{"title":"Vaccine Diplomacy and Vaccine Nationalism","authors":"A. V. Kirgizov-Barskii, V. Morozov","doi":"10.31278/1810-6374-2022-20-3-162-181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the COVID-19 pandemic in place for over two years now, it is time to assess its main aspects and tendencies, and identify the new features it has lent to the international relations landscape. This paper studies two approaches different countries have taken in developing and distributing COVID vaccines during the pandemic;these approaches are defined as ‘vaccine diplomacy’ and ‘vaccine nationalism.’ Until recently, vaccine diplomacy has played only a marginal role in international relations, while vaccine nationalism has not been considered a problem internationally. During the COVID-19 pandemic, both approaches came to the forefront as foreign policy tools that have sharpened existing contradictions between the global North and the global South and exacerbated the confrontation between the West, on the one side, and China and Russia, on the other. Examining cases of cooperation and confrontation between different countries during the development and distribution of COVID vaccines, the authors analyze why and how they tend to employ vaccine diplomacy or vaccine nationalism, whether the two approaches have helped them achieve their goals and helped the world overcome the global healthcare crisis. © 2022, Foreign Policy Research Foundation. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":36949,"journal":{"name":"Russia in Global Affairs","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russia in Global Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2022-20-3-162-181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

With the COVID-19 pandemic in place for over two years now, it is time to assess its main aspects and tendencies, and identify the new features it has lent to the international relations landscape. This paper studies two approaches different countries have taken in developing and distributing COVID vaccines during the pandemic;these approaches are defined as ‘vaccine diplomacy’ and ‘vaccine nationalism.’ Until recently, vaccine diplomacy has played only a marginal role in international relations, while vaccine nationalism has not been considered a problem internationally. During the COVID-19 pandemic, both approaches came to the forefront as foreign policy tools that have sharpened existing contradictions between the global North and the global South and exacerbated the confrontation between the West, on the one side, and China and Russia, on the other. Examining cases of cooperation and confrontation between different countries during the development and distribution of COVID vaccines, the authors analyze why and how they tend to employ vaccine diplomacy or vaccine nationalism, whether the two approaches have helped them achieve their goals and helped the world overcome the global healthcare crisis. © 2022, Foreign Policy Research Foundation. All rights reserved.
疫苗外交和疫苗民族主义
当前,新冠肺炎疫情已持续两年多,有必要对疫情的主要方面和趋势进行评估,确定疫情给国际关系格局带来的新特点。本文研究了不同国家在大流行期间开发和分发COVID疫苗时采取的两种方法;这些方法被定义为“疫苗外交”和“疫苗民族主义”。“直到最近,疫苗外交在国际关系中只发挥了边缘作用,而疫苗民族主义在国际上也没有被视为一个问题。在新冠肺炎疫情期间,这两种外交手段都凸显出来,加剧了南北矛盾,加剧了西方与中俄之间的对抗。作者分析了在新冠疫苗开发和流通过程中不同国家之间的合作和对抗案例,分析了他们倾向于使用疫苗外交或疫苗民族主义的原因和方式,以及这两种方法是否帮助他们实现了目标,并帮助世界克服了全球医疗危机。©2022,外交政策研究基金会。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Russia in Global Affairs
Russia in Global Affairs Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信