A Prospective Study on the Reliability of First-Trimester Ultrasound in Identifying the Gestational Sac Implantation Site

R. Svirsky, O. Moore, N. Smorgick, U. Rozovski, A. Zimerman, R. Maymon
{"title":"A Prospective Study on the Reliability of First-Trimester Ultrasound in Identifying the Gestational Sac Implantation Site","authors":"R. Svirsky, O. Moore, N. Smorgick, U. Rozovski, A. Zimerman, R. Maymon","doi":"10.26502/ogr0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Normal and abnormal implantation of the gestational sac may affect obstetrical outcomes. We sought to evaluate whether ultrasound can correctly identify the first-trimester gestational sac implantation wall compared to diagnostic hysteroscopy. Methods: Consecutive women diagnosed with first-trimester pregnancy loss who opted for surgical termination of pregnancy were prospectively recruited to the study. Pre-operatively, an ultrasound scan was performed to assess for the gestational sac implantation wall. Subsequently, the surgical procedure of diagnostic hysteroscopy combined with suction and curettage was performed. The sonographers were blinded to the hysteroscopy results. The gestational sac implantation wall was determined and compared between the two modalities. Results: Twenty-three women were included in the study. The median gestational age 9 (range: 6 to 13) weeks, and the median crown-rump length was 7 (range 6-9) mm. In one case, the implantation site was determined only by the U.S. In the remaining, the U.S. and hysteroscopy gestational sac location were identical (21/22, 95%). Thus, the correlation between the sonographic and hysteroscopy findings was 0.96. Conclusion: Ultrasound is a reliable method for the detection of the early gestational sac implantation site.","PeriodicalId":74336,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/ogr0116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Normal and abnormal implantation of the gestational sac may affect obstetrical outcomes. We sought to evaluate whether ultrasound can correctly identify the first-trimester gestational sac implantation wall compared to diagnostic hysteroscopy. Methods: Consecutive women diagnosed with first-trimester pregnancy loss who opted for surgical termination of pregnancy were prospectively recruited to the study. Pre-operatively, an ultrasound scan was performed to assess for the gestational sac implantation wall. Subsequently, the surgical procedure of diagnostic hysteroscopy combined with suction and curettage was performed. The sonographers were blinded to the hysteroscopy results. The gestational sac implantation wall was determined and compared between the two modalities. Results: Twenty-three women were included in the study. The median gestational age 9 (range: 6 to 13) weeks, and the median crown-rump length was 7 (range 6-9) mm. In one case, the implantation site was determined only by the U.S. In the remaining, the U.S. and hysteroscopy gestational sac location were identical (21/22, 95%). Thus, the correlation between the sonographic and hysteroscopy findings was 0.96. Conclusion: Ultrasound is a reliable method for the detection of the early gestational sac implantation site.
妊娠早期超声识别妊娠囊着床部位可靠性的前瞻性研究
目的:正常和异常的妊娠囊着床可能影响产科结局。与诊断性宫腔镜相比,我们试图评估超声是否能正确识别早期妊娠囊着床壁。方法:前瞻性招募连续诊断为早期妊娠丢失并选择手术终止妊娠的妇女进行研究。术前,行超声扫描评估妊娠囊着床壁。随后行诊断性宫腔镜联合抽刮术。超声医师对宫腔镜检查结果不知情。测定并比较两种方式的妊娠囊着床壁。结果:23名女性被纳入研究。中位胎龄9周(范围6 ~ 13周),中位冠臀长7 mm(范围6 ~ 9 mm)。1例患者仅通过U.S.确定着床部位,其余患者与宫腔镜妊娠囊位置相同(21/ 22,95 %)。因此,超声检查与宫腔镜检查结果的相关性为0.96。结论:超声是一种可靠的检测早期妊娠囊着床部位的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信