Pilot Lifestyle Intervention Effect on Lifestyle Behaviors, Psychosocial Factors, and Affect.

Mei-Wei Chang, Duane T Wegener, Alai Tan, Jonathan Schaffir, Brett Worly, Katherine Strafford, Loriana Soma, Cassandra Sampsell
{"title":"Pilot Lifestyle Intervention Effect on Lifestyle Behaviors, Psychosocial Factors, and Affect.","authors":"Mei-Wei Chang, Duane T Wegener, Alai Tan, Jonathan Schaffir, Brett Worly, Katherine Strafford, Loriana Soma, Cassandra Sampsell","doi":"10.26502/jppch.74050147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper presents results of a pilot intervention effect on lifestyle behaviors, psychosocial factors, and affect among overweight or obese pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>70 participants were randomized to the intervention or usual care group. During the 20-week intervention, participants completed a weekly online intervention module and joined individual online health coaching. Data were collected at baseline (<17 weeks gestation), 24-27 weeks gestation (T2), and 35-37 weeks gestation (T3). Lifestyle behaviors included dietary intake (caloric, fat, added sugar, fruit, and vegetable) and physical activity (PA). Psychosocial factors were autonomous motivation, self-efficacy, executive functions, and consideration of future consequences (CFC). Affect comprised stress and emotional control. Two-sample <i>t</i>-tests and Cohen's <i>d</i> effect sizes were used to compare between group mean differences in the change from baseline to T2 and T3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T2, intervention positively influenced fruit intake (<i>d</i> = 0.47), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (<i>d</i> = 0.36), self-efficacy for healthy eating (<i>d</i> = 0.25) and PA (<i>d</i> = 0.24), executive functions (behavior regulation, d = -0.21; metacognition, <i>d</i> = -0.69), and emotional control (<i>d</i> = 0.79). At T3, the intervention improved PA (<i>d</i> = 0.19), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (<i>d</i> = 0.33), self-efficacy for healthy eating (<i>d</i> = 0.50) and stress management (<i>d</i> = 0.62), executive functions (metacognition, <i>d</i> = -0.46), CFC (<i>d</i> = 0.25), stress (<i>d</i> = -0.45), and emotional control (<i>d</i> = 0.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pilot intervention has positive effects on most psychosocial variables and affect in both the short and long terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":73894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatrics, perinatology and child health","volume":"1 1","pages":"74-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10994102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatrics, perinatology and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jppch.74050147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This paper presents results of a pilot intervention effect on lifestyle behaviors, psychosocial factors, and affect among overweight or obese pregnant women.

Methods: 70 participants were randomized to the intervention or usual care group. During the 20-week intervention, participants completed a weekly online intervention module and joined individual online health coaching. Data were collected at baseline (<17 weeks gestation), 24-27 weeks gestation (T2), and 35-37 weeks gestation (T3). Lifestyle behaviors included dietary intake (caloric, fat, added sugar, fruit, and vegetable) and physical activity (PA). Psychosocial factors were autonomous motivation, self-efficacy, executive functions, and consideration of future consequences (CFC). Affect comprised stress and emotional control. Two-sample t-tests and Cohen's d effect sizes were used to compare between group mean differences in the change from baseline to T2 and T3.

Results: At T2, intervention positively influenced fruit intake (d = 0.47), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (d = 0.36), self-efficacy for healthy eating (d = 0.25) and PA (d = 0.24), executive functions (behavior regulation, d = -0.21; metacognition, d = -0.69), and emotional control (d = 0.79). At T3, the intervention improved PA (d = 0.19), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (d = 0.33), self-efficacy for healthy eating (d = 0.50) and stress management (d = 0.62), executive functions (metacognition, d = -0.46), CFC (d = 0.25), stress (d = -0.45), and emotional control (d = 0.72).

Conclusion: The pilot intervention has positive effects on most psychosocial variables and affect in both the short and long terms.

试点生活方式干预对生活方式行为、社会心理因素和情感的影响。
背景:本文介绍了一项对超重或肥胖孕妇的生活方式行为、社会心理因素和情感产生影响的试点干预结果。方法:70 名参与者被随机分配到干预组或常规护理组。在为期 20 周的干预过程中,参与者每周完成一个在线干预模块,并参加个人在线健康辅导。收集基线数据(使用t检验和Cohen's d效应大小比较从基线到T2和T3的变化的组间平均差异):在 T2 阶段,干预措施对水果摄入量(d = 0.47)、健康饮食自主动机(d = 0.36)、健康饮食自我效能(d = 0.25)和 PA(d = 0.24)、执行功能(行为调节,d = -0.21;元认知,d = -0.69)和情绪控制(d = 0.79)产生了积极影响。在 T3 阶段,干预改善了 PA(d = 0.19)、健康饮食自主动机(d = 0.33)、健康饮食自我效能感(d = 0.50)和压力管理(d = 0.62)、执行功能(元认知,d = -0.46)、CFC(d = 0.25)、压力(d = -0.45)和情绪控制(d = 0.72):试点干预对大多数社会心理变量和情感都有短期和长期的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信