Mei-Wei Chang, Duane T Wegener, Alai Tan, Jonathan Schaffir, Brett Worly, Katherine Strafford, Loriana Soma, Cassandra Sampsell
{"title":"Pilot Lifestyle Intervention Effect on Lifestyle Behaviors, Psychosocial Factors, and Affect.","authors":"Mei-Wei Chang, Duane T Wegener, Alai Tan, Jonathan Schaffir, Brett Worly, Katherine Strafford, Loriana Soma, Cassandra Sampsell","doi":"10.26502/jppch.74050147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper presents results of a pilot intervention effect on lifestyle behaviors, psychosocial factors, and affect among overweight or obese pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>70 participants were randomized to the intervention or usual care group. During the 20-week intervention, participants completed a weekly online intervention module and joined individual online health coaching. Data were collected at baseline (<17 weeks gestation), 24-27 weeks gestation (T2), and 35-37 weeks gestation (T3). Lifestyle behaviors included dietary intake (caloric, fat, added sugar, fruit, and vegetable) and physical activity (PA). Psychosocial factors were autonomous motivation, self-efficacy, executive functions, and consideration of future consequences (CFC). Affect comprised stress and emotional control. Two-sample <i>t</i>-tests and Cohen's <i>d</i> effect sizes were used to compare between group mean differences in the change from baseline to T2 and T3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T2, intervention positively influenced fruit intake (<i>d</i> = 0.47), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (<i>d</i> = 0.36), self-efficacy for healthy eating (<i>d</i> = 0.25) and PA (<i>d</i> = 0.24), executive functions (behavior regulation, d = -0.21; metacognition, <i>d</i> = -0.69), and emotional control (<i>d</i> = 0.79). At T3, the intervention improved PA (<i>d</i> = 0.19), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (<i>d</i> = 0.33), self-efficacy for healthy eating (<i>d</i> = 0.50) and stress management (<i>d</i> = 0.62), executive functions (metacognition, <i>d</i> = -0.46), CFC (<i>d</i> = 0.25), stress (<i>d</i> = -0.45), and emotional control (<i>d</i> = 0.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pilot intervention has positive effects on most psychosocial variables and affect in both the short and long terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":73894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatrics, perinatology and child health","volume":"1 1","pages":"74-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10994102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatrics, perinatology and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jppch.74050147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This paper presents results of a pilot intervention effect on lifestyle behaviors, psychosocial factors, and affect among overweight or obese pregnant women.
Methods: 70 participants were randomized to the intervention or usual care group. During the 20-week intervention, participants completed a weekly online intervention module and joined individual online health coaching. Data were collected at baseline (<17 weeks gestation), 24-27 weeks gestation (T2), and 35-37 weeks gestation (T3). Lifestyle behaviors included dietary intake (caloric, fat, added sugar, fruit, and vegetable) and physical activity (PA). Psychosocial factors were autonomous motivation, self-efficacy, executive functions, and consideration of future consequences (CFC). Affect comprised stress and emotional control. Two-sample t-tests and Cohen's d effect sizes were used to compare between group mean differences in the change from baseline to T2 and T3.
Results: At T2, intervention positively influenced fruit intake (d = 0.47), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (d = 0.36), self-efficacy for healthy eating (d = 0.25) and PA (d = 0.24), executive functions (behavior regulation, d = -0.21; metacognition, d = -0.69), and emotional control (d = 0.79). At T3, the intervention improved PA (d = 0.19), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (d = 0.33), self-efficacy for healthy eating (d = 0.50) and stress management (d = 0.62), executive functions (metacognition, d = -0.46), CFC (d = 0.25), stress (d = -0.45), and emotional control (d = 0.72).
Conclusion: The pilot intervention has positive effects on most psychosocial variables and affect in both the short and long terms.