Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm Calculation in Total Body Irradiation: A Comparison with Monte Carlo Calculation and Dosimetry

Saikkonen A, Ojala J, Keyrilainen J
{"title":"Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm Calculation in Total Body Irradiation: A Comparison with Monte Carlo Calculation and Dosimetry","authors":"Saikkonen A, Ojala J, Keyrilainen J","doi":"10.26502/jcsct.5079136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of an analytical anisotropic algorithm calculation of the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system in the TBI treatment planning at an extended source-to-surface distance of 400 cm. Materials and Methods: The TBI treatment was planned with the Varian Eclipse TPS using the AAA for the dose calculation. Monte Carlo calculations were performed using the EGSnrc code package. Percentage depth dose curves, central axis dose profiles and absolute doses of the 6 MV photon beams from the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator were measured at an extended SSD of 400 cm in water, solid water and anthropomorphic phantoms. Results: Calculated and measured PDD curves were in good agreement at the depths of 30.0 cm or less. Calculated J Cancer Sci Clin Ther 2021; 5 (4): 532-547 DOI: 10.26502/jcsct.5079136 Journal of Cancer Science and Clinical Therapeutics 533 and measured central axis dose profiles were clinically acceptable, observing the largest uncertainties close the field edges. Absolute dose measurements in water phantoms showed that the MC and AAA calculations overestimated doses by up to 2.2 % and 1.8 %, respectively. In the anthropomorphic phantom, the difference between measured and calculated mean doses in the whole body volume was 1.0 % and 6.2 % for MC and AAA, respectively. In the AAA calculation, the largest observed difference was 8.3 % in the head. Conclusions: The Eclipse’s AAA calculation can be safely used for the TBI treatment planning at the extended SSD of 400 cm. However, in order to achieve a higher level of accuracy in the TBI planning, one must carefully validate the TPS at extended SSDs.","PeriodicalId":73634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jcsct.5079136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of an analytical anisotropic algorithm calculation of the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system in the TBI treatment planning at an extended source-to-surface distance of 400 cm. Materials and Methods: The TBI treatment was planned with the Varian Eclipse TPS using the AAA for the dose calculation. Monte Carlo calculations were performed using the EGSnrc code package. Percentage depth dose curves, central axis dose profiles and absolute doses of the 6 MV photon beams from the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator were measured at an extended SSD of 400 cm in water, solid water and anthropomorphic phantoms. Results: Calculated and measured PDD curves were in good agreement at the depths of 30.0 cm or less. Calculated J Cancer Sci Clin Ther 2021; 5 (4): 532-547 DOI: 10.26502/jcsct.5079136 Journal of Cancer Science and Clinical Therapeutics 533 and measured central axis dose profiles were clinically acceptable, observing the largest uncertainties close the field edges. Absolute dose measurements in water phantoms showed that the MC and AAA calculations overestimated doses by up to 2.2 % and 1.8 %, respectively. In the anthropomorphic phantom, the difference between measured and calculated mean doses in the whole body volume was 1.0 % and 6.2 % for MC and AAA, respectively. In the AAA calculation, the largest observed difference was 8.3 % in the head. Conclusions: The Eclipse’s AAA calculation can be safely used for the TBI treatment planning at the extended SSD of 400 cm. However, in order to achieve a higher level of accuracy in the TBI planning, one must carefully validate the TPS at extended SSDs.
全身照射的解析各向异性算法计算:与蒙特卡罗计算和剂量法的比较
目的:本研究旨在探讨分析各向异性算法计算Varian Eclipse治疗计划系统在扩展源-表面距离400 cm的TBI治疗计划中的可行性和准确性。材料与方法:采用Varian Eclipse TPS计划TBI治疗,使用AAA进行剂量计算。蒙特卡罗计算使用EGSnrc代码包执行。测量了瓦里安TrueBeam直线加速器发射的6 MV光子光束在400 cm的扩展SSD上在水中、固体水中和拟人幻影中的百分比深度剂量曲线、中心轴剂量曲线和绝对剂量。结果:在30.0 cm及以下深度,计算和测量的PDD曲线吻合良好。contemporary medicine; 2011;5 (4): 532-547 DOI: 10.26502/jcsct.5079136癌症科学与临床治疗杂志533和测量的中心轴剂量谱是临床可接受的,观察到最大的不确定性接近场边缘。水幻影中的绝对剂量测量表明,MC和AAA计算分别高估了2.2%和1.8%的剂量。在拟人化幻体中,MC和AAA在全身体积中测量的平均剂量与计算的平均剂量之间的差异分别为1.0%和6.2%。在AAA计算中,在头部观察到的最大差异为8.3%。结论:Eclipse的AAA计算可以安全地用于扩展SSD 400 cm的TBI治疗计划。然而,为了在TBI规划中达到更高的准确度,必须仔细验证扩展ssd上的TPS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信