The Relationship between Heel Fat Pad Thickness and Flexibility and Physical Demographics

Kazuaki Kinoshita, T. Hananouchi, Masayuki Fukuda, Mai Kitagawa, Mika Hirata
{"title":"The Relationship between Heel Fat Pad Thickness and Flexibility and Physical Demographics","authors":"Kazuaki Kinoshita, T. Hananouchi, Masayuki Fukuda, Mai Kitagawa, Mika Hirata","doi":"10.26502/fjhs.088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To clarify the factors that contribute to the development of heel pain in young individuals, this study investigated the relationship of heel thickness and flexibility with physical demographics among Japanese elementary and junior high school students. A total of 69 heels were included as participants in this study. The measurement items were age, height, weight, rohrer index, heel fat pad thickness and flexibility. The heel fat pad thickness and flexibility was measured using an ultrasound probe and S oftgram (Shinko Denshi co.,ltd.). The heel fat pad thickness measurements were distance from the skin to the calcaneus was measured by applying the ultrasound probe both without (hereafter referred to as \"non-pressure thickness\") and with manually applied pressure to the measurement point (hereafter referred to as “pressure thickness”) . The heel fat pad flexibility evaluation consisted of subtracting non-pressure thickness by pressure thickness (thickness of change difference), and computing for the value when the thickness of change difference is divided by the non-pressure thickness and multiplied by 100 (thickness of change rate). In addition to this, heel fat pad flexibility evaluation consisted of measuring using the softness sensor Softgram. Multiple regression analysis showed that weight and age were predictors of non-pressure thickness. On the other hand, pressure thickness was weight was a predictor of pressure thickness. In the relationship between heel fat pad flexibility and demographic data, the Softgram measurements showed a significantly fair correlation with age and significantly moderate correlations with height and weight. Multiple regression analysis further showed that body weight was a predictor of Softgram measurements. This results suggest that heel fat pad thickness and flexibility in elementary and junior high school students became thicker and stiffer, respectively, with increasing age, height and weight. Notably, both thickness and flexibility were particularly related to body weight.","PeriodicalId":73052,"journal":{"name":"Fortune journal of health sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortune journal of health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fjhs.088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To clarify the factors that contribute to the development of heel pain in young individuals, this study investigated the relationship of heel thickness and flexibility with physical demographics among Japanese elementary and junior high school students. A total of 69 heels were included as participants in this study. The measurement items were age, height, weight, rohrer index, heel fat pad thickness and flexibility. The heel fat pad thickness and flexibility was measured using an ultrasound probe and S oftgram (Shinko Denshi co.,ltd.). The heel fat pad thickness measurements were distance from the skin to the calcaneus was measured by applying the ultrasound probe both without (hereafter referred to as "non-pressure thickness") and with manually applied pressure to the measurement point (hereafter referred to as “pressure thickness”) . The heel fat pad flexibility evaluation consisted of subtracting non-pressure thickness by pressure thickness (thickness of change difference), and computing for the value when the thickness of change difference is divided by the non-pressure thickness and multiplied by 100 (thickness of change rate). In addition to this, heel fat pad flexibility evaluation consisted of measuring using the softness sensor Softgram. Multiple regression analysis showed that weight and age were predictors of non-pressure thickness. On the other hand, pressure thickness was weight was a predictor of pressure thickness. In the relationship between heel fat pad flexibility and demographic data, the Softgram measurements showed a significantly fair correlation with age and significantly moderate correlations with height and weight. Multiple regression analysis further showed that body weight was a predictor of Softgram measurements. This results suggest that heel fat pad thickness and flexibility in elementary and junior high school students became thicker and stiffer, respectively, with increasing age, height and weight. Notably, both thickness and flexibility were particularly related to body weight.
足跟脂肪垫厚度与柔韧性的关系及体质统计学
为了弄清导致年轻人脚跟疼痛的因素,本研究调查了日本小学生和初中生的脚跟厚度和柔韧性与身体人口统计学的关系。共有69只高跟鞋参与了这项研究。测量项目为年龄、身高、体重、罗勒指数、足跟脂肪垫厚度和柔韧性。使用超声探头和S - gram (Shinko Denshi co.,ltd)测量鞋跟脂肪垫的厚度和柔韧性。足跟脂肪垫厚度测量是指从皮肤到跟骨的距离,采用超声探头在测量点上不施加压力(以下称为“无压厚度”)和手动施加压力(以下称为“压厚度”)测量。鞋跟脂肪垫柔韧性评价方法为:用压力厚度(变化差厚度)减去无压厚度,计算变化差厚度除以无压厚度,再乘以100(变化率厚度)后的值。除此之外,鞋跟脂肪垫的柔韧性评估包括使用柔软度传感器Softgram进行测量。多元回归分析显示,体重和年龄是非压力厚度的预测因子。另一方面,压力厚度是重量是压力厚度的预测因子。在跟脂垫柔韧性与人口统计数据之间的关系中,Softgram测量结果显示与年龄有显著的公平相关性,与身高和体重有显著的中等相关性。多元回归分析进一步表明,体重是Softgram测量的预测因子。结果表明,随着年龄、身高和体重的增加,小学生和初中生脚跟脂肪垫厚度和柔韧性分别变厚、变硬。值得注意的是,厚度和柔韧性都与体重密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信