M. Asifudduza, N. Ahmed, Md. Owashak Faysal, Rahatul Quadir, Sharmin Ali, Md Rakibul Hasan, Nurul Islam, S. Sultana
{"title":"Modified Shock Index to Predict In-Hospital Outcome among Patients Presenting with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction","authors":"M. Asifudduza, N. Ahmed, Md. Owashak Faysal, Rahatul Quadir, Sharmin Ali, Md Rakibul Hasan, Nurul Islam, S. Sultana","doi":"10.26502/fccm.92920333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Prompt identification of higher-risk patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is crucial to pursue a more aggressive approach. Objective: To evaluate the Modified Shock Index (MSI), as a predictor of in-hospital outcome among patients with STEMI. Methods: This cross sectional observational study was carried out in the Department of Cardiology, National Heart Foundation Hospital and Research Institute, Mirpur, Dhaka from January 2020 to December 2020. A total of 100 patients were selected with acute STEMI admitted in the department of Cardiology, NHFH&RI, within the study period, who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The mean age 55.6±10.2 years in Group I and 56.1±12.0 years in Group II. Male patients were predominant in both the groups. Regarding MSI 40(40.0%) patients had high admission MSI (≥0.91) and 60(60.0%) patients had normal admission MSI (<0.91). Regarding risk factors, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, dyslipidemia and family H/O CAD were not statistically significant (p>0.05) between the two groups. There was a significant (p<0.05) difference observed for NT-pro-BNP which was higher in group I than group II (77.5% vs 40.0%), but other investigations were not statistically significant (p>0.05) between the two groups. LVEF was found lower in Group I than group II (38.0±4.7 percent vs 42.6±5.2 percent), which was statistically significant (p<0.05) between the two groups. Regarding ECG findings 72.5% of patients were found with anterior MI in group I and 33.3% in group II, which was statistically significant (p<0.05) between the two groups. During the period of hospitalization patients in group I developed heart failure more than group II patients (67.5% vs 26.7%, p value=0.001). Development of cardiogenic shock was also significant in group I patients compared to group II patients (57.5% vs","PeriodicalId":72523,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Prompt identification of higher-risk patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is crucial to pursue a more aggressive approach. Objective: To evaluate the Modified Shock Index (MSI), as a predictor of in-hospital outcome among patients with STEMI. Methods: This cross sectional observational study was carried out in the Department of Cardiology, National Heart Foundation Hospital and Research Institute, Mirpur, Dhaka from January 2020 to December 2020. A total of 100 patients were selected with acute STEMI admitted in the department of Cardiology, NHFH&RI, within the study period, who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The mean age 55.6±10.2 years in Group I and 56.1±12.0 years in Group II. Male patients were predominant in both the groups. Regarding MSI 40(40.0%) patients had high admission MSI (≥0.91) and 60(60.0%) patients had normal admission MSI (<0.91). Regarding risk factors, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, dyslipidemia and family H/O CAD were not statistically significant (p>0.05) between the two groups. There was a significant (p<0.05) difference observed for NT-pro-BNP which was higher in group I than group II (77.5% vs 40.0%), but other investigations were not statistically significant (p>0.05) between the two groups. LVEF was found lower in Group I than group II (38.0±4.7 percent vs 42.6±5.2 percent), which was statistically significant (p<0.05) between the two groups. Regarding ECG findings 72.5% of patients were found with anterior MI in group I and 33.3% in group II, which was statistically significant (p<0.05) between the two groups. During the period of hospitalization patients in group I developed heart failure more than group II patients (67.5% vs 26.7%, p value=0.001). Development of cardiogenic shock was also significant in group I patients compared to group II patients (57.5% vs
背景:及时识别st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的高危患者对于采取更积极的治疗方法至关重要。目的:评价改良休克指数(MSI)作为STEMI患者住院预后的预测指标。方法:本横断面观察研究于2020年1月至2020年12月在达卡米尔普尔国立心脏基金会医院和研究所心内科进行。选择研究期间在国家卫生与社会科学研究院心内科住院的急性STEMI患者100例,符合纳入和排除标准。结果:ⅰ组患者平均年龄55.6±10.2岁,ⅱ组患者平均年龄56.1±12.0岁。两组患者均以男性为主。MSI方面,两组患者入院时MSI高(≥0.91)者40例(40.0%),入院时MSI正常者60例(60.0%)(0.05)。两组比较差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。I组LVEF低于II组(38.0±4.7% vs 42.6±5.2%),两组比较差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。心电图表现方面,ⅰ组有72.5%的患者出现前路心肌梗死,ⅱ组为33.3%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在住院期间,I组患者发生心力衰竭的比例高于II组(67.5% vs 26.7%, p值=0.001)。与II组患者相比,I组患者发生心源性休克的比例也很显著(57.5% vs