Bilateral Approach with Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections in Patients with One-Sided Facial Hyperkinetic Movements

C. Karapantzou, Joao Pedro Vale, Frank Joachim Haubner, Konstantinos Zagoridis, Konstantinos Agas, Konstantinos Karagogos, Nikoleta Zagoridou, M. Canis
{"title":"Bilateral Approach with Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections in Patients with One-Sided Facial Hyperkinetic Movements","authors":"C. Karapantzou, Joao Pedro Vale, Frank Joachim Haubner, Konstantinos Zagoridis, Konstantinos Agas, Konstantinos Karagogos, Nikoleta Zagoridou, M. Canis","doi":"10.26502/acmcr.96550462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Main subject of our investigation was to clarify, if a bilateral approach with Botulinum toxin type A injections is more efficient from cosmetic and functional aspect, compared to unilateral injections, in patients with one-sided facial hyperkinetic movements, like synkinesis and hemi facial spasm. Methods: Our patient cohort included 30 patients suffering from unilateral hyperkinetic facial contractions. We performed a total of 60 injections, 30 of them only on the Arch Clin Med Case Rep 2022; 6 (2): 149-172 DOI: 10.26502/acmcr.96550462 Archives of Clinical and Medical Case Reports 150 affected side and 30 on both facial sides. All participants underwent 2 botulinum toxin sessions, with a 4 months period lying between the injections. Our statistical analysis was divided into 4 hypothesis testing sub-groups, based on the results of the subjective satisfaction rates our patients delivered 2 months and 6 months after the initial botulinum toxin session. Furthermore 2 doctors evaluated the results based on pre-and after photographs on a Quartile Grading Scale for objective evaluation for the same time periods. Each one of the observers received one patient group, either with bilateral or with ipsilateral treatments, without knowing which group they received. Results: Summarizing the statistical results we analyzed from both sources (patients and doc-tors-observers), we found statistically significant differences in satisfaction rate between the two groups (p=.004) and a better objective evaluation on patients who underwent combined treatments. Conclusions: Our work confirmed the initial assumption that patients with facial asymmetry of different etiology benefit from a bilateral therapeutic approach with botulinum toxin injections, instead of one-sided injections into the hyperkinetic or dyskinesia facial side.","PeriodicalId":72280,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical and medical case reports","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical and medical case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/acmcr.96550462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Main subject of our investigation was to clarify, if a bilateral approach with Botulinum toxin type A injections is more efficient from cosmetic and functional aspect, compared to unilateral injections, in patients with one-sided facial hyperkinetic movements, like synkinesis and hemi facial spasm. Methods: Our patient cohort included 30 patients suffering from unilateral hyperkinetic facial contractions. We performed a total of 60 injections, 30 of them only on the Arch Clin Med Case Rep 2022; 6 (2): 149-172 DOI: 10.26502/acmcr.96550462 Archives of Clinical and Medical Case Reports 150 affected side and 30 on both facial sides. All participants underwent 2 botulinum toxin sessions, with a 4 months period lying between the injections. Our statistical analysis was divided into 4 hypothesis testing sub-groups, based on the results of the subjective satisfaction rates our patients delivered 2 months and 6 months after the initial botulinum toxin session. Furthermore 2 doctors evaluated the results based on pre-and after photographs on a Quartile Grading Scale for objective evaluation for the same time periods. Each one of the observers received one patient group, either with bilateral or with ipsilateral treatments, without knowing which group they received. Results: Summarizing the statistical results we analyzed from both sources (patients and doc-tors-observers), we found statistically significant differences in satisfaction rate between the two groups (p=.004) and a better objective evaluation on patients who underwent combined treatments. Conclusions: Our work confirmed the initial assumption that patients with facial asymmetry of different etiology benefit from a bilateral therapeutic approach with botulinum toxin injections, instead of one-sided injections into the hyperkinetic or dyskinesia facial side.
双侧入路注射A型肉毒杆菌毒素治疗单侧面部运动过度
背景:我们研究的主要目的是阐明,对于单侧面部运动过度的患者,如联动性和半面肌痉挛,双侧注射a型肉毒杆菌毒素是否比单侧注射更有效,从美容和功能方面。方法:我们的患者队列包括30例患有单侧面部过度运动性收缩的患者。我们共进行了60次注射,其中30次仅针对Arch clinm病例Rep 2022;6 (2): 149-172 DOI: 10.26502/acmcr.96550462临床与医学病例档案报告患侧150例,双侧30例。所有参与者都进行了两次肉毒杆菌毒素注射,注射间隔为4个月。根据患者在首次肉毒杆菌治疗后2个月和6个月的主观满意度,我们将统计分析分为4个假设检验亚组。此外,2名医生根据同一时间段的客观评价四分位分级量表对前后照片进行了评估。每个观察者接受一个病人组,要么接受双侧治疗,要么接受同侧治疗,不知道他们接受的是哪一组。结果:综合两组(患者和医生-观察者)的统计结果,我们发现两组患者的满意率差异有统计学意义(p= 0.004),对联合治疗的患者有更好的客观评价。结论:我们的工作证实了最初的假设,即不同病因的面部不对称患者受益于双侧注射肉毒杆菌毒素的治疗方法,而不是单方面注射到多动或运动障碍的面部一侧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信