Facilitating Scientific Literacy Through Writing: A Write-to-Learn Assignment for Large Introductory Undergraduate Biology Courses

CourseSource Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24918/cs.2023.26
Ayuni W. Ratnayake, Cindy Naw, Karolyn R. Keir, Aarthi Ashok
{"title":"Facilitating Scientific Literacy Through Writing: A Write-to-Learn Assignment for Large Introductory Undergraduate Biology Courses","authors":"Ayuni W. Ratnayake, Cindy Naw, Karolyn R. Keir, Aarthi Ashok","doi":"10.24918/cs.2023.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Write-to-learn (WTL) assignments have been used in a variety of disciplines to encourage conceptual learning and critical thinking in undergraduate education. These assignments focus on facilitating rather than assessing learning. Conversely, write-to-communicate (WTC) assignments ( e.g., lab reports and exams), often with the goal of assessing learning, are more commonly employed in foundation STEM courses. We developed a WTL assignment that focuses on promoting curiosity driven learning, critical thinking, and metacognition; skills that promote students’ scientific literacy through writing. We integrated theoretical frameworks for scientific literacy, that include the sub-constructs of third space , authenticity , and multiple discourse as well as science as a human endeavour , and metacognition and self-direction (1, 2) to develop this 3-part WTL assignment. In this assignment, students first select a topic of interest and write freely on their current understanding of the topic (Part 1). They then develop a research question based on their writing and seek answers to their question from published literature (Part 2). Finally, they reflect on their overall experience with the WTL process and propose further avenues of investigation for their research topic (Part 3). Student feedback suggests that they enjoyed the WTL process and their overall satisfaction with the structure of the assignment was high. As we continue to evolve the assignment based on student feedback, we are gratified that students reported high self-efficacy with regard to future writing as a result of participating in this assignment. We recommend use of this type of WTL assignment in large, introductory STEM courses, so as to facilitate rather than simply assess students’ learning.","PeriodicalId":72713,"journal":{"name":"CourseSource","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CourseSource","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24918/cs.2023.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Write-to-learn (WTL) assignments have been used in a variety of disciplines to encourage conceptual learning and critical thinking in undergraduate education. These assignments focus on facilitating rather than assessing learning. Conversely, write-to-communicate (WTC) assignments ( e.g., lab reports and exams), often with the goal of assessing learning, are more commonly employed in foundation STEM courses. We developed a WTL assignment that focuses on promoting curiosity driven learning, critical thinking, and metacognition; skills that promote students’ scientific literacy through writing. We integrated theoretical frameworks for scientific literacy, that include the sub-constructs of third space , authenticity , and multiple discourse as well as science as a human endeavour , and metacognition and self-direction (1, 2) to develop this 3-part WTL assignment. In this assignment, students first select a topic of interest and write freely on their current understanding of the topic (Part 1). They then develop a research question based on their writing and seek answers to their question from published literature (Part 2). Finally, they reflect on their overall experience with the WTL process and propose further avenues of investigation for their research topic (Part 3). Student feedback suggests that they enjoyed the WTL process and their overall satisfaction with the structure of the assignment was high. As we continue to evolve the assignment based on student feedback, we are gratified that students reported high self-efficacy with regard to future writing as a result of participating in this assignment. We recommend use of this type of WTL assignment in large, introductory STEM courses, so as to facilitate rather than simply assess students’ learning.
通过写作促进科学素养:大型本科生物学入门课程的“从写到学”作业
在本科教育中,写作-学习(WTL)作业已被用于各种学科,以鼓励概念学习和批判性思维。这些作业侧重于促进学习,而不是评估学习。相反,写作交流(WTC)作业(例如,实验报告和考试)通常以评估学习为目标,更常用于基础STEM课程。我们开发了一个WTL作业,重点是促进好奇心驱动的学习,批判性思维和元认知;通过写作提高学生科学素养的技能。我们整合了科学素养的理论框架,包括第三空间、真实性、多元话语、科学作为人类努力的子结构、元认知和自我指导(1,2)来开发这个由三部分组成的WTL作业。在这项作业中,学生首先选择一个感兴趣的主题,并自由地撰写他们目前对该主题的理解(第1部分)。然后,他们根据自己的写作提出一个研究问题,并从发表的文献中寻求问题的答案(第2部分)。最后,他们反思了他们在WTL过程中的整体体验,并为他们的研究课题提出了进一步的调查途径(第3部分)。学生的反馈表明,他们喜欢WTL过程,他们对作业结构的总体满意度很高。当我们根据学生的反馈继续改进作业时,我们很高兴地看到,学生们在参与这项作业后,对未来的写作表现出了很高的自我效能。我们建议在大型STEM入门课程中使用这种类型的WTL作业,以促进而不是简单地评估学生的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信