Online Information Literacy: Applying the CRAAP Test to Vaccine (Mis)information

CourseSource Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.24918/cs.2022.44
E. Holzhausen, Jhewelle Fitz-Henley, C. Theisen
{"title":"Online Information Literacy: Applying the CRAAP Test to Vaccine (Mis)information","authors":"E. Holzhausen, Jhewelle Fitz-Henley, C. Theisen","doi":"10.24918/cs.2022.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching scientific literacy skills can help combat the propagation of misinformation online. This lesson is intended to give students practice identifying reliable scientific information on the Internet, in the context of vaccine safety. It was designed for a first-year seminar taught fully through remote instruction but can be adapted for any in-person or blended course. It can also be easily modified to use for other biologically-relevant topics and is especially well suited for controversial topics. This lesson consists of three activities. First, students review an article about identifying reliable Internet resources and search online for vaccine safety information. Then, students meet in small groups to review and rank the resources that each of them found from most to least reliable, referencing the criteria laid out by the CRAAP test (Currency, Relevance, Accuracy, Authority, Purpose). After ranking each resource, students reflect on how their thinking about online resources has changed during the activity and how they will evaluate scientific information online in the future. Finally, students use the reliable resources that they and their classmates compiled during the activity as references to write about how the biology of vaccines relates to the five Core Concepts. Following this lesson, 100% of student groups were able to correctly identify at least one reliable and unreliable online resource and 95% of groups were able to articulate particular qualities of resources that helped them establish their reliability. Further, 100% of groups could articulate how their thinking had changed throughout this activity.","PeriodicalId":72713,"journal":{"name":"CourseSource","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CourseSource","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24918/cs.2022.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teaching scientific literacy skills can help combat the propagation of misinformation online. This lesson is intended to give students practice identifying reliable scientific information on the Internet, in the context of vaccine safety. It was designed for a first-year seminar taught fully through remote instruction but can be adapted for any in-person or blended course. It can also be easily modified to use for other biologically-relevant topics and is especially well suited for controversial topics. This lesson consists of three activities. First, students review an article about identifying reliable Internet resources and search online for vaccine safety information. Then, students meet in small groups to review and rank the resources that each of them found from most to least reliable, referencing the criteria laid out by the CRAAP test (Currency, Relevance, Accuracy, Authority, Purpose). After ranking each resource, students reflect on how their thinking about online resources has changed during the activity and how they will evaluate scientific information online in the future. Finally, students use the reliable resources that they and their classmates compiled during the activity as references to write about how the biology of vaccines relates to the five Core Concepts. Following this lesson, 100% of student groups were able to correctly identify at least one reliable and unreliable online resource and 95% of groups were able to articulate particular qualities of resources that helped them establish their reliability. Further, 100% of groups could articulate how their thinking had changed throughout this activity.
在线信息素养:应用CRAAP测试疫苗(Mis)信息
教授科学素养技能有助于打击网上错误信息的传播。本课旨在让学生练习在疫苗安全的背景下识别互联网上可靠的科学信息。它是为第一年的研讨会设计的,完全通过远程教学,但可以适应任何面对面或混合课程。它也可以很容易地修改,以用于其他生物学相关的主题,特别适合于有争议的话题。这节课包括三个活动。首先,学生们复习一篇关于确定可靠的互联网资源和在线搜索疫苗安全信息的文章。然后,学生们以小组为单位,参照CRAAP测试列出的标准(实用性、相关性、准确性、权威性、目的),从最可靠到最不可靠地对他们发现的资源进行审查和排名。在对每个资源进行排名后,学生们反思他们对在线资源的看法在活动中发生了什么变化,以及他们将如何在未来评估在线科学信息。最后,学生利用他们和同学在活动中收集的可靠资源作为参考,撰写疫苗生物学与五个核心概念的关系。在这节课之后,100%的学生小组能够正确识别至少一种可靠和不可靠的在线资源,95%的小组能够清晰地表达帮助他们建立可靠性的资源的特定品质。此外,100%的小组都能清楚地表达出他们的想法是如何在这个活动中发生变化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信