Evaluation of the usability of certain symbols indicating automobile lighting status

A. Zunjic, Uroš Manojlović, S. Cicevic, Aleksandar Trifunović
{"title":"Evaluation of the usability of certain symbols indicating automobile lighting status","authors":"A. Zunjic, Uroš Manojlović, S. Cicevic, Aleksandar Trifunović","doi":"10.31075/pis.68.03.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research presented in this document addresses the ability of drivers to understand what information has been presented by symbols that are used to indicate certain status of vehicle lights. The concept known as usability can be applied extensively to ergonomic design and testing of a wide range of products and systems, including cars. In order to assess drivers' understanding of what information is exactly presented by symbols that are used to describe the state of the lighting system of an automobile, a usability test was designed. The test included 4 symbols, three of which were ISO-approved symbols. This study of usability of symbols on a sample of drivers showed that understanding of information represented by symbols is relatively low, ranging from 41.93% to 61.29%. Certain statistical tests allow for prognosis results on a population level, using the data based on a sample. For that purpose, we used the Z-test of a sample proportion. Testing of statistical hypotheses yielded even lower values of symbols understanding at the population level, for each tested symbol. Suggestions have been made to improve the usability of this type of symbol.","PeriodicalId":32747,"journal":{"name":"Put i Saobracaj","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Put i Saobracaj","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31075/pis.68.03.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The research presented in this document addresses the ability of drivers to understand what information has been presented by symbols that are used to indicate certain status of vehicle lights. The concept known as usability can be applied extensively to ergonomic design and testing of a wide range of products and systems, including cars. In order to assess drivers' understanding of what information is exactly presented by symbols that are used to describe the state of the lighting system of an automobile, a usability test was designed. The test included 4 symbols, three of which were ISO-approved symbols. This study of usability of symbols on a sample of drivers showed that understanding of information represented by symbols is relatively low, ranging from 41.93% to 61.29%. Certain statistical tests allow for prognosis results on a population level, using the data based on a sample. For that purpose, we used the Z-test of a sample proportion. Testing of statistical hypotheses yielded even lower values of symbols understanding at the population level, for each tested symbol. Suggestions have been made to improve the usability of this type of symbol.
某些指示汽车照明状态的符号的可用性评价
本文档中提出的研究解决了驾驶员理解用于指示车辆灯的某些状态的符号所呈现的信息的能力。可用性的概念可以广泛应用于人体工程学设计和各种产品和系统的测试,包括汽车。为了评估驾驶员对用于描述汽车照明系统状态的符号所准确呈现的信息的理解,设计了可用性测试。测试包括4个符号,其中3个是iso认可的符号。本研究以司机为样本,对符号可用性的研究表明,司机对符号所代表信息的理解程度相对较低,在41.93%到61.29%之间。某些统计检验允许使用基于样本的数据在总体水平上得出预后结果。为此,我们使用了样本比例的z检验。对于每个被测试的符号,统计假设的测试在总体水平上产生了更低的符号理解值。已经提出了一些建议来提高这类符号的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信