Antibacterial ability of green okra fruit (Abelmoschus esculentus) extract at concentrations of 12.5-100% against Staphylococcus aureus

N. Lestari, Rizkiya Agnes Safitri, Zainul Cholid, Agustin Wulan Suci Dharmayanti
{"title":"Antibacterial ability of green okra fruit (Abelmoschus esculentus) extract at concentrations of 12.5-100% against Staphylococcus aureus","authors":"N. Lestari, Rizkiya Agnes Safitri, Zainul Cholid, Agustin Wulan Suci Dharmayanti","doi":"10.24198/pjd.vol35no2.46281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The common bacteria found in infected root canals are Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus (20%). S. aureus infection can spread to the periapical tissues causing periapical lesions. Pulp necrosis requires root canal treatment. One of the irrigants used in root canal treatment is 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid  (17% EDTA). This material can soften the root canal dentine making it easier to prepare because it can dissolve the inorganic material of smear layer. The disadvantage of 17% EDTA is low antibacterial power, so an alternative irrigation material is needed. Irrigants should ideally be antibacterial. The green okra fruit extract contains antibacterial properties such as alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, tannins, and terpenoids. This study aims to determine the antibacterial ability of green okra fruit extract concentrations of 12.5%, 25%, 50%, and 100% against S. aureus. Methods: This type of research was an in-vitro laboratory experiment with a posttest-only control group design. The antibacterial test used the disc diffusion method consisted of 6 groups, i.e, green okra fruit extract concentrations of 12.5%, 25%, 50%, 100%, 17% EDTA (positive control), and aquadest (negative control).  Antibacterial ability indicated by the clear zone around the disc paper Results: The average diameter of the inhibition zone was green okra fruit extract concentrations of 12.5% (12.14 mm), 25% (14.89 mm), 50% (18.53 mm), 100% (21.1 mm ), 17% EDTA (22.08 mm), and aquadest (0 mm). The results were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test and showed a significant difference between all research groups (α <0.05). Conclusion: The antibacterial ability of green okra fruit extract (Abelmoschus esculentus) increased from concentrations of 12.5%, 25%, 50%, and 100%, but still lower than the antibacterial ability of 17% EDTA against Staphylococcus aureus. ","PeriodicalId":31757,"journal":{"name":"Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol35no2.46281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The common bacteria found in infected root canals are Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus (20%). S. aureus infection can spread to the periapical tissues causing periapical lesions. Pulp necrosis requires root canal treatment. One of the irrigants used in root canal treatment is 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid  (17% EDTA). This material can soften the root canal dentine making it easier to prepare because it can dissolve the inorganic material of smear layer. The disadvantage of 17% EDTA is low antibacterial power, so an alternative irrigation material is needed. Irrigants should ideally be antibacterial. The green okra fruit extract contains antibacterial properties such as alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, tannins, and terpenoids. This study aims to determine the antibacterial ability of green okra fruit extract concentrations of 12.5%, 25%, 50%, and 100% against S. aureus. Methods: This type of research was an in-vitro laboratory experiment with a posttest-only control group design. The antibacterial test used the disc diffusion method consisted of 6 groups, i.e, green okra fruit extract concentrations of 12.5%, 25%, 50%, 100%, 17% EDTA (positive control), and aquadest (negative control).  Antibacterial ability indicated by the clear zone around the disc paper Results: The average diameter of the inhibition zone was green okra fruit extract concentrations of 12.5% (12.14 mm), 25% (14.89 mm), 50% (18.53 mm), 100% (21.1 mm ), 17% EDTA (22.08 mm), and aquadest (0 mm). The results were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test and showed a significant difference between all research groups (α <0.05). Conclusion: The antibacterial ability of green okra fruit extract (Abelmoschus esculentus) increased from concentrations of 12.5%, 25%, 50%, and 100%, but still lower than the antibacterial ability of 17% EDTA against Staphylococcus aureus. 
绿秋葵果实(Abelmoschus esculentus)提取物在12.5 ~ 100%浓度下对金黄色葡萄球菌的抑菌能力
简介:感染根管中常见的细菌是革兰氏阳性菌,如金黄色葡萄球菌(20%)。金黄色葡萄球菌感染可扩散到根尖周围组织,引起根尖周围病变。髓质坏死需要根管治疗。根管治疗中使用的一种冲洗剂是17%乙二胺四乙酸(17% EDTA)。该材料可以溶解涂抹层的无机物质,使根管本质软化,使其更容易制备。17% EDTA的缺点是抗菌力较低,因此需要一种替代的灌溉材料。冲洗液最好是抗菌的。绿色秋葵果实提取物含有抗菌特性,如生物碱、类黄酮、皂苷、单宁和萜类。本研究旨在测定绿秋葵果实提取物浓度为12.5%、25%、50%和100%时对金黄色葡萄球菌的抑菌能力。方法:本研究采用体外实验室实验,采用纯后测对照组设计。采用圆盘扩散法进行抗菌试验,分为6组,分别为绿秋葵果提取物浓度12.5%、25%、50%、100%、17% EDTA(阳性对照)和aquadest(阴性对照)。结果:绿秋葵果提取物的平均抑菌区直径分别为12.5% (12.14 mm)、25% (14.89 mm)、50% (18.53 mm)、100% (21.1 mm)、17% EDTA (22.08 mm)和aquadest (0 mm)。结果经Mann-Whitney检验分析,各研究组间差异有统计学意义(α <0.05)。结论:绿秋葵果提取物(Abelmoschus esculentus)在12.5%、25%、50%和100%浓度下抑菌能力均有提高,但仍低于17% EDTA对金黄色葡萄球菌的抑菌能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信