Qu’est-ce que problématiser sa thèse de doctorat ?

C. Xypas
{"title":"Qu’est-ce que problématiser sa thèse de doctorat ?","authors":"C. Xypas","doi":"10.26220/REV.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need to develop solid arguments for grounding the PhD studies concerning social sciences and humanities is recognized by both doctoral students and supervisors. Nevertheless, it seems that doctoral students may encounter significant difficulties in developing such arguments. Moreover, it may also be difficult for the supervisors to support them effectively in doing so. This gives rise to questions about the process of grounding a PhD study. How do doctoral students come up with their research problems? And which difficulties they seem to encounter when they are engaged in developing the arguments they need for grounding these problems?","PeriodicalId":30116,"journal":{"name":"Review of Science Mathematics and ICT Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Science Mathematics and ICT Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26220/REV.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need to develop solid arguments for grounding the PhD studies concerning social sciences and humanities is recognized by both doctoral students and supervisors. Nevertheless, it seems that doctoral students may encounter significant difficulties in developing such arguments. Moreover, it may also be difficult for the supervisors to support them effectively in doing so. This gives rise to questions about the process of grounding a PhD study. How do doctoral students come up with their research problems? And which difficulties they seem to encounter when they are engaged in developing the arguments they need for grounding these problems?
什么是质疑你的博士论文?
博士生和导师都认识到,有必要为社会科学和人文学科的博士研究奠定坚实的基础。然而,似乎博士生在发展这样的论点时可能会遇到很大的困难。此外,管理者也可能很难有效地支持他们这样做。这就引发了关于博士研究搁浅过程的问题。博士生是如何提出他们的研究问题的?当他们为这些问题建立基础而进行论证时,他们似乎遇到了哪些困难?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信