Autonomy in Advanced Chronic Disease

Gonçalves Am, E. Coelho, A. Pacheco, C. Barbosa, A. Jacomo
{"title":"Autonomy in Advanced Chronic Disease","authors":"Gonçalves Am, E. Coelho, A. Pacheco, C. Barbosa, A. Jacomo","doi":"10.24105/2155-9627.10.332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors question the respect for the principle of autonomy of the patient admitted into intensive care unit, limiting the scope of the question to the chronically ill. A questionnaire was drafted and distributed to 378 chronically ill patients in Hospital de Braga, which intended to assess whether they were informed of the possibility of the need for admission to intensive care, as well as invasive techniques that they might have to be submitted. The results showed that information was clearly insufficient. The scientific literature articles in this area supports that the lack of information is still very common. So, the authors propose improving this communication. Note that, in the context of chronic disease, prompt information of the patient of the future possibility of need for admission into intensive care is the way to ensure respect of their last will. They suggest that the doctor's commitment to respecting the autonomy of the chronically ill is an opportunity for better care.","PeriodicalId":89408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical research & bioethics","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical research & bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24105/2155-9627.10.332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors question the respect for the principle of autonomy of the patient admitted into intensive care unit, limiting the scope of the question to the chronically ill. A questionnaire was drafted and distributed to 378 chronically ill patients in Hospital de Braga, which intended to assess whether they were informed of the possibility of the need for admission to intensive care, as well as invasive techniques that they might have to be submitted. The results showed that information was clearly insufficient. The scientific literature articles in this area supports that the lack of information is still very common. So, the authors propose improving this communication. Note that, in the context of chronic disease, prompt information of the patient of the future possibility of need for admission into intensive care is the way to ensure respect of their last will. They suggest that the doctor's commitment to respecting the autonomy of the chronically ill is an opportunity for better care.
晚期慢性疾病的自主性
作者质疑是否尊重病人进入重症监护病房的自主权原则,将问题的范围局限于慢性病患者。起草并向布拉加医院的378名慢性病患者分发了一份调查问卷,目的是评估他们是否被告知需要接受重症监护的可能性,以及他们可能必须接受的侵入性技术。结果表明,信息明显不足。该领域的科学文献文章支持信息缺乏仍然是非常普遍的。因此,作者建议改进这种交流。请注意,在慢性疾病的情况下,及时告知患者未来可能需要入住重症监护病房是确保尊重其遗嘱的方式。他们认为,医生尊重慢性病患者自主权的承诺是提供更好护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信