{"title":"Tragic History and Barbarian Speech in Sallust´s Jugurtha","authors":"C. Dué","doi":"10.2307/3185222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"S ALLUST attributes to the Numidian prince Adherbal a speech before the Roman senate (Jugurtha XIV 14) that resonates with echoes of Greek and Roman literature. Adherbal argues that for the sake of friendship with the Romans he has given up every ally and put himself into desperate circumstances. At the climax of his speech he raises a series of alternatives, only to reject each one. At first glance these questions may appear to be merely a familiar rhetorical topos.1 But a closer examination will reveal that Sallust here is making specific allusion to the Medea of Euripides, the Medea of Ennius, and Catullus 64, whose close relationship has been established and discussed.2 Sallust deliberately portrays Adherbal in a situation that is similar to that","PeriodicalId":81378,"journal":{"name":"Harvard studies in classical philology","volume":"100 1","pages":"311-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3185222","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard studies in classical philology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3185222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Abstract
S ALLUST attributes to the Numidian prince Adherbal a speech before the Roman senate (Jugurtha XIV 14) that resonates with echoes of Greek and Roman literature. Adherbal argues that for the sake of friendship with the Romans he has given up every ally and put himself into desperate circumstances. At the climax of his speech he raises a series of alternatives, only to reject each one. At first glance these questions may appear to be merely a familiar rhetorical topos.1 But a closer examination will reveal that Sallust here is making specific allusion to the Medea of Euripides, the Medea of Ennius, and Catullus 64, whose close relationship has been established and discussed.2 Sallust deliberately portrays Adherbal in a situation that is similar to that
S ALLUST认为努米底亚王子阿德巴尔在罗马元老院前的一次演讲(Jugurtha XIV 14)与希腊和罗马文学的回声产生了共鸣。阿德巴尔认为,为了与罗马人的友谊,他放弃了每一个盟友,把自己置于绝望的境地。在他演讲的高潮,他提出了一系列的选择,只是拒绝了每一个。乍一看,这些问题似乎只是老生常谈的修辞修辞但是,仔细一看,我们就会发现,在这里,萨洛斯特指的是欧里庇得斯的美狄亚、恩尼乌斯的美狄亚和卡图卢斯的美狄亚,这些美狄亚和卡图卢斯的密切关系已经确立和讨论过了Sallust故意将阿戴巴尔描绘在一个类似的情境中