Walking in the spirit of blood: Moral identity among born-again christians

Ethnology Pub Date : 2004-06-22 DOI:10.2307/3774066
James S. Bielo
{"title":"Walking in the spirit of blood: Moral identity among born-again christians","authors":"James S. Bielo","doi":"10.2307/3774066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proliferation of small groups within American Protestantism, in particular those devoted to Bible study, raises questions about the collective construction of meaning in congregational life. Using discourse as an analytical tool, this article explores the meaning of moral identity as constructed in three Protestant groups in the southern United States. Discursive participants relied on three strategies for building a concept of the moral self: positioning the heart at the center of moral identity; describing what it means to be born again; and describing three moral \"others.\" (Discourse, moral identity, born-again Christianity) ********** Recent ethnographic work among mainline Protestants has noted the centrality of Bible study to congregational life, individual spirituality, and religious communication (Wuthnow 1994a, 1994b; Davie 1995; Roberts n.d.). Similarly, anthropologists working with text-based religions have been called to shift attention from the internal properties of those texts to the active processes through which their meaning is engaged, interpreted, and applied by adherents; what Bowen (1992:495) calls the \"social life of scriptures.\" This article bridges these two lines of research by examining how, within three Protestant groups, Bible-study discourse is concentrated on answering the central question of what it means to be moral. The question of moral identity is placed in relation to these groups' dominant sense of religious belonging as born-again Christians, and considered for how it is achieved, communicated, and reaffirmed through the discursive action of members. While some anthropological attention has been directed toward the cultural grammar of the born-again movement (Stromberg 1993; Harding 2000), this article takes a discourse-centered approach to the construction of moral identity, viewing language as a form of social practice rather than a system of rhetoric. It is necessary here to define \"discourse,\" a favored term in anthropology (Lutz and Abu-Lughod 1990:7). Three understandings of discourse are employed by anthropologists: first, as a single stretch of talk or written text, in either dialogic or monologue form (Sherzer 1987); second, as a collection of interpersonal and/or written texts occurring across a defined time and space, and usually concerning a particular topic (Stewart 1996); third, as a historically deep field of texts, symbols, and practices typically analyzed to discern institutional relations of power (Foucault 1980). This essay employs the second of these approaches. Accordingly, the discourse-centered approach is not the same as that proposed by Urban (1991), but instead uses Bahktin's (1934) premise that all speech is situated within a larger discursive setting. Discourse is open ended, and therefore must be approached across time and space to allow its ongoing meanings to be revealed. It therefore is necessary to investigate discursive activity across numerous Bible studies. Utterances do not exist in isolation, but in relation to one another (Bahktin 1986). The same must be said for a particular discursive context such as Bible study. This approach is carried out using data collected among three Protestant groups in a rural area on Virginia's Chesapeake Bay coast. (1) One, a United Methodist congregation, is experiencing a resurgence, both theologically and numerically. Influenced by his background with the Assemblies of God, Pastor Jeb has placed increased emphasis on an evangelical and scripture-based Christianity during his three-year tenure. Some older members struggle with the transition, but six new members have joined in the past year. Jeb's effect is evident in the church's small-group life. Two biweekly Bible studies and a second Sunday-school group have been added to the adult class on Sunday mornings. The Wednesday and Thursday groups have seven regular participants, while the second Sunday-school class is a bit larger, including participants from both weekly Bible studies. …","PeriodicalId":81209,"journal":{"name":"Ethnology","volume":"43 1","pages":"271-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3774066","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3774066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The proliferation of small groups within American Protestantism, in particular those devoted to Bible study, raises questions about the collective construction of meaning in congregational life. Using discourse as an analytical tool, this article explores the meaning of moral identity as constructed in three Protestant groups in the southern United States. Discursive participants relied on three strategies for building a concept of the moral self: positioning the heart at the center of moral identity; describing what it means to be born again; and describing three moral "others." (Discourse, moral identity, born-again Christianity) ********** Recent ethnographic work among mainline Protestants has noted the centrality of Bible study to congregational life, individual spirituality, and religious communication (Wuthnow 1994a, 1994b; Davie 1995; Roberts n.d.). Similarly, anthropologists working with text-based religions have been called to shift attention from the internal properties of those texts to the active processes through which their meaning is engaged, interpreted, and applied by adherents; what Bowen (1992:495) calls the "social life of scriptures." This article bridges these two lines of research by examining how, within three Protestant groups, Bible-study discourse is concentrated on answering the central question of what it means to be moral. The question of moral identity is placed in relation to these groups' dominant sense of religious belonging as born-again Christians, and considered for how it is achieved, communicated, and reaffirmed through the discursive action of members. While some anthropological attention has been directed toward the cultural grammar of the born-again movement (Stromberg 1993; Harding 2000), this article takes a discourse-centered approach to the construction of moral identity, viewing language as a form of social practice rather than a system of rhetoric. It is necessary here to define "discourse," a favored term in anthropology (Lutz and Abu-Lughod 1990:7). Three understandings of discourse are employed by anthropologists: first, as a single stretch of talk or written text, in either dialogic or monologue form (Sherzer 1987); second, as a collection of interpersonal and/or written texts occurring across a defined time and space, and usually concerning a particular topic (Stewart 1996); third, as a historically deep field of texts, symbols, and practices typically analyzed to discern institutional relations of power (Foucault 1980). This essay employs the second of these approaches. Accordingly, the discourse-centered approach is not the same as that proposed by Urban (1991), but instead uses Bahktin's (1934) premise that all speech is situated within a larger discursive setting. Discourse is open ended, and therefore must be approached across time and space to allow its ongoing meanings to be revealed. It therefore is necessary to investigate discursive activity across numerous Bible studies. Utterances do not exist in isolation, but in relation to one another (Bahktin 1986). The same must be said for a particular discursive context such as Bible study. This approach is carried out using data collected among three Protestant groups in a rural area on Virginia's Chesapeake Bay coast. (1) One, a United Methodist congregation, is experiencing a resurgence, both theologically and numerically. Influenced by his background with the Assemblies of God, Pastor Jeb has placed increased emphasis on an evangelical and scripture-based Christianity during his three-year tenure. Some older members struggle with the transition, but six new members have joined in the past year. Jeb's effect is evident in the church's small-group life. Two biweekly Bible studies and a second Sunday-school group have been added to the adult class on Sunday mornings. The Wednesday and Thursday groups have seven regular participants, while the second Sunday-school class is a bit larger, including participants from both weekly Bible studies. …
在血的灵中行走:重生基督徒的道德认同
美国新教内部小群体的激增,尤其是那些致力于圣经研究的群体,引发了关于教会生活意义的集体建构的问题。本文以话语为分析工具,探讨了美国南部三个新教群体所建构的道德认同的意义。话语参与者依赖于三种策略来构建道德自我概念:将心定位于道德认同的中心;描述重生的意义;并描述了三个道德上的“他人”。(话语,道德认同,重生的基督教)**********最近主流新教徒的民族志工作注意到圣经研究在教会生活,个人灵性和宗教交流中的中心地位(Wuthnow 1994a, 1994b;戴维1995;罗伯茨无日期)。同样,研究基于文本的宗教的人类学家也被要求将注意力从这些文本的内部属性转移到其意义被信徒参与、解释和应用的积极过程上;Bowen(1992:495)称之为“经文的社会生活”。本文通过考察在三个新教团体中,圣经研究话语是如何集中在回答什么是道德这一核心问题上,从而将这两条研究线连接起来。道德认同的问题与这些群体作为重生的基督徒的主要宗教归属感有关,并考虑如何通过成员的话语行为实现,沟通和重申。虽然一些人类学的注意力已经指向重生运动的文化语法(Stromberg 1993;Harding 2000),本文采用以话语为中心的方法来构建道德认同,将语言视为一种社会实践形式,而不是一种修辞系统。这里有必要定义“话语”,这是人类学中最受欢迎的术语(Lutz and Abu-Lughod 1990:7)。人类学家对话语有三种理解:第一,作为对话或独白形式的谈话或书面文本的单一延伸(Sherzer 1987);第二,作为跨越特定时间和空间的人际和/或书面文本的集合,通常涉及特定主题(Stewart 1996);第三,作为文本、符号和实践的历史深层领域,通常用于分析权力的制度关系(福柯,1980)。本文采用了第二种方法。因此,以话语为中心的方法与Urban(1991)提出的方法不同,而是使用了巴赫金(1934)的前提,即所有话语都位于一个更大的话语环境中。话语是开放的,因此必须跨越时间和空间,才能揭示其持续的意义。因此,有必要在众多圣经研究中调查话语活动。话语不是孤立存在的,而是相互关联的(巴赫廷,1986年)。同样的道理也适用于特定的话语环境,比如圣经学习。这种方法是使用在弗吉尼亚州切萨皮克湾沿岸农村地区的三个新教团体中收集的数据来实施的。(1)联合卫理公会(United Methodist)正经历着神学和数字上的复兴。受神召会背景的影响,杰布牧师在三年任期内更加强调福音派和以圣经为基础的基督教。一些老成员在过渡中挣扎,但去年有六名新成员加入。杰布的影响在教会的小团体生活中很明显。两周一次的圣经学习和第二个主日学小组已在周日上午增加到成人班。周三和周四的小组有七名固定参与者,而第二个主日学校的班级人数稍大,包括每周圣经学习的参与者。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信