Negotiating Culture: Conflict and Consensus in U.S. Garage-Sale Bargaining

Ethnology Pub Date : 2003-06-22 DOI:10.2307/3773802
Gretchen M. Herrmann
{"title":"Negotiating Culture: Conflict and Consensus in U.S. Garage-Sale Bargaining","authors":"Gretchen M. Herrmann","doi":"10.2307/3773802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although bargaining is often used in the purchase of high-priced items, Americans are ambivalent about the practice of haggling. The U.S. garage sale is one of the few venues where numbers of Americans bargain for low- to moderately priced goods, but common understandings about garage-sale bargaining are unevenly shared among American participants, who are accustomed to fixed-price merchandise. Students and foreign-born participants from cultures with more robust bargaining styles afford a contrast with the preferred American pattern of socially engaged bargaining, allowing the underlying normative patterns and strategies for American garage-sale bargaining to emerge. The polarization that can ensue from bargaining negotiations also highlights the underdocumented cultural values of friendliness and pleasantness that ideally surround commercial transactions in the United States. (Bargaining, United States, garage sales) ********** This article addresses bargaining in the U.S. garage sale, one of the few places in America where shoppers and sellers haggle for low- to moderately priced goods. Although it is not representative of mainstream economic practices, garage-sale bargaining does shed light on American values surrounding economic exchange and on the American ambivalence toward the practice of bargaining itself. The blatant vying for material advantage in bargaining reveals a set of values that, although always present in commercial transactions, are usually muted by the convention of fixed prices and an aura of pleasantness attendant to store purchases. The garage sale provides a site in which to explore the tensions in U.S. exchange between the socially affirming and egalitarian on the one hand, and the individual maximizing and unequal on the other, and to come to appreciate how the relative balance in the exchange shifts. Bargaining practice both reflects the veneer of friendliness of daily commercial transactions and at times lays bare the struggle for advantage that often underlies exchange. This examination of small-scale bargaining, sometimes over nickels and dimes, complicates the essentialized depiction of the West as a thoroughly rationalized economic system (Carrier 1992), affording a more nuanced picture of American exchange, and provides a unique ethnographic statement about this practice. The focus here is on the cultural aspects of garage-sale bargaining, although factors such as gender and class can also be important in bargaining practice (Herrmann, In press). This essay demonstrates that particular American patterns of garage-sale bargaining exist, if unevenly accepted, and are practiced with considerable inter- and intracultural variation. Roughly stated, there is a circumscribed range of culturally tolerated bargaining behavior and those who transgress these boundaries may be viewed as aggressive, self-serving, and even greedy. This essay also contributes to the growing body of literature on cultural economics (e.g., Gudeman 1986; Wilk 1996), particularly in the West, where the overarching market paradigm obscures t l? social relations and cultural components of economic exchange (e.g., Carrier 1997, 1998; Dilley 1992; Plattner 1996), and to the literature on the sociocultural construction of price in Western exchange (Alexander 1992; Geismar 2001; Prus 1985). After introducing the social and cultural context of the garage sale, the essay presents factors that influence bargaining there: polarization; paradigms and patterns; and pride, performance, and play. Many recent anthropological treatments of bargaining utilize an information approach, in which buyers and sellers have differential access to information, to understanding the practice (e.g., Alexander and Alexander 1987; Fanselow 1990; Geertz 1979). According to the information model, one quite familiar to Western consumers, shoppers engage in an extensive search for standardized or homogeneous goods, seeking the best price for fungible goods from a number of venders. …","PeriodicalId":81209,"journal":{"name":"Ethnology","volume":"42 1","pages":"237-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3773802","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3773802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Although bargaining is often used in the purchase of high-priced items, Americans are ambivalent about the practice of haggling. The U.S. garage sale is one of the few venues where numbers of Americans bargain for low- to moderately priced goods, but common understandings about garage-sale bargaining are unevenly shared among American participants, who are accustomed to fixed-price merchandise. Students and foreign-born participants from cultures with more robust bargaining styles afford a contrast with the preferred American pattern of socially engaged bargaining, allowing the underlying normative patterns and strategies for American garage-sale bargaining to emerge. The polarization that can ensue from bargaining negotiations also highlights the underdocumented cultural values of friendliness and pleasantness that ideally surround commercial transactions in the United States. (Bargaining, United States, garage sales) ********** This article addresses bargaining in the U.S. garage sale, one of the few places in America where shoppers and sellers haggle for low- to moderately priced goods. Although it is not representative of mainstream economic practices, garage-sale bargaining does shed light on American values surrounding economic exchange and on the American ambivalence toward the practice of bargaining itself. The blatant vying for material advantage in bargaining reveals a set of values that, although always present in commercial transactions, are usually muted by the convention of fixed prices and an aura of pleasantness attendant to store purchases. The garage sale provides a site in which to explore the tensions in U.S. exchange between the socially affirming and egalitarian on the one hand, and the individual maximizing and unequal on the other, and to come to appreciate how the relative balance in the exchange shifts. Bargaining practice both reflects the veneer of friendliness of daily commercial transactions and at times lays bare the struggle for advantage that often underlies exchange. This examination of small-scale bargaining, sometimes over nickels and dimes, complicates the essentialized depiction of the West as a thoroughly rationalized economic system (Carrier 1992), affording a more nuanced picture of American exchange, and provides a unique ethnographic statement about this practice. The focus here is on the cultural aspects of garage-sale bargaining, although factors such as gender and class can also be important in bargaining practice (Herrmann, In press). This essay demonstrates that particular American patterns of garage-sale bargaining exist, if unevenly accepted, and are practiced with considerable inter- and intracultural variation. Roughly stated, there is a circumscribed range of culturally tolerated bargaining behavior and those who transgress these boundaries may be viewed as aggressive, self-serving, and even greedy. This essay also contributes to the growing body of literature on cultural economics (e.g., Gudeman 1986; Wilk 1996), particularly in the West, where the overarching market paradigm obscures t l? social relations and cultural components of economic exchange (e.g., Carrier 1997, 1998; Dilley 1992; Plattner 1996), and to the literature on the sociocultural construction of price in Western exchange (Alexander 1992; Geismar 2001; Prus 1985). After introducing the social and cultural context of the garage sale, the essay presents factors that influence bargaining there: polarization; paradigms and patterns; and pride, performance, and play. Many recent anthropological treatments of bargaining utilize an information approach, in which buyers and sellers have differential access to information, to understanding the practice (e.g., Alexander and Alexander 1987; Fanselow 1990; Geertz 1979). According to the information model, one quite familiar to Western consumers, shoppers engage in an extensive search for standardized or homogeneous goods, seeking the best price for fungible goods from a number of venders. …
谈判文化:美国车库拍卖讨价还价中的冲突与共识
虽然讨价还价经常用于购买高价商品,但美国人对讨价还价的做法持矛盾态度。美国的车库拍卖是为数不多的几个美国人会为低价或中等价格的商品讨价还价的场所之一,但美国参与者对车库拍卖讨价还价的共识并不一致,他们习惯了固定价格的商品。来自议价风格更强的文化背景的学生和外国出生的参与者与美国社会参与议价的首选模式形成对比,从而使美国车库拍卖议价的潜在规范模式和策略得以显现。讨价还价谈判可能带来的两极分化,也凸显了在美国商业交易中理想的友好和愉快的文化价值。(讨价还价,美国,车库甩卖)**********这篇文章讨论的是美国车库甩卖中的讨价还价,这是美国为数不多的消费者和卖家为低价或中等价格的商品讨价还价的地方之一。虽然它不能代表主流经济实践,但车库交易确实揭示了美国人围绕经济交换的价值观,以及美国人对讨价还价实践本身的矛盾心理。在讨价还价中公然争夺物质优势,揭示了一套价值观,尽管这些价值观一直存在于商业交易中,但通常被固定价格的惯例和商店购物带来的愉快气氛所掩盖。车库拍卖提供了一个探索美国社会肯定和平等主义与个人最大化和不平等之间交换的紧张局势的场所,并开始欣赏交换中的相对平衡是如何变化的。讨价还价的做法既反映了日常商业交易中友好的外表,有时也暴露了交易背后往往存在的对利益的争夺。这种对小规模讨价还价的考察,有时是对五分硬币和一角硬币的讨价还价,使西方作为一个彻底合理化的经济体系的本质描述复杂化(Carrier 1992),提供了一幅更细致入微的美国交换的图景,并提供了一种独特的关于这种做法的民族志陈述。虽然性别和阶级等因素在讨价还价实践中也很重要,但这里的重点是车库销售讨价还价的文化方面。这篇文章证明了美国特有的车库买卖讨价还价模式是存在的,如果不被普遍接受,并且在实践中具有相当大的文化间和文化内差异。粗略地说,文化上容忍的讨价还价行为有一个界限,那些超越这个界限的人可能被视为咄咄逼人、自私自利甚至贪婪。这篇文章也为文化经济学的文献体系做出了贡献(例如,Gudeman 1986;Wilk 1996),特别是在西方,那里的总体市场范式模糊了它?社会关系和经济交流的文化成分(例如,Carrier 1997,1998;Dilley 1992;Plattner 1996),以及关于西方交换中价格的社会文化建构的文献(Alexander 1992;美国2001年;保诚1985)。在介绍了车库拍卖的社会文化背景之后,本文提出了影响车库拍卖讨价还价的因素:两极分化;范例和模式;还有骄傲,表演和玩耍。最近许多关于讨价还价的人类学研究都采用了信息方法,其中买方和卖方获得信息的途径不同,以理解这种做法(例如,Alexander和Alexander 1987;Fanselow 1990;国务院1979年)。根据西方消费者非常熟悉的信息模型,购物者广泛地寻找标准化或同质的商品,从许多供应商那里为可替代的商品寻求最优惠的价格。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信