The role of sexual orientation in differentiating between perceptions of rape myths, gender role stereotypes and social distance: The case of Israel

IF 0.3 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Temida Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2298/tem2001003s
Mally Shechory-Bitton, L. Jaeger
{"title":"The role of sexual orientation in differentiating between perceptions of rape myths, gender role stereotypes and social distance: The case of Israel","authors":"Mally Shechory-Bitton, L. Jaeger","doi":"10.2298/tem2001003s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the current study was to explore the relationships between Israeli gender role stereotypes, rape myths toward male and female victims, and social distance from sex crime victims and sex offenders, according to the observer?s sex and sexual orientation (gay men, lesbian women, and heterosexual men and women). The data was collected during the end of 2016 and included 401 Israeli participants. A multivariate analysis of variance, as well as series of Pearson analyses, were used to examine the differences between groups as well as to examine the correlations between research variables. Results broadly conformed to predictions, with men generally more negative than women. However, people with a same-sex orientation endorse more liberal gender role attitudes than heterosexuals. In addition, overall, participants expressed greater willingness to maintain social contacts with victims than with offenders. Nonetheless, only among heterosexuals significant negative correlations between rape myths and willingness to maintain social contacts with victims were found.","PeriodicalId":41858,"journal":{"name":"Temida","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/tem2001003s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to explore the relationships between Israeli gender role stereotypes, rape myths toward male and female victims, and social distance from sex crime victims and sex offenders, according to the observer?s sex and sexual orientation (gay men, lesbian women, and heterosexual men and women). The data was collected during the end of 2016 and included 401 Israeli participants. A multivariate analysis of variance, as well as series of Pearson analyses, were used to examine the differences between groups as well as to examine the correlations between research variables. Results broadly conformed to predictions, with men generally more negative than women. However, people with a same-sex orientation endorse more liberal gender role attitudes than heterosexuals. In addition, overall, participants expressed greater willingness to maintain social contacts with victims than with offenders. Nonetheless, only among heterosexuals significant negative correlations between rape myths and willingness to maintain social contacts with victims were found.
性取向在区分对强奸神话、性别角色刻板印象和社会距离的看法中的作用:以以色列为例
据《观察家报》报道,当前研究的目的是探索以色列性别角色刻板印象、对男性和女性受害者的强奸神话以及与性犯罪受害者和性犯罪者的社会距离之间的关系。性和性取向(男同性恋,女同性恋,异性恋男女)。这些数据是在2016年底收集的,包括401名以色列参与者。多变量方差分析以及一系列的Pearson分析被用来检验组间的差异以及研究变量之间的相关性。结果与预测基本一致,男性通常比女性更消极。然而,同性取向的人比异性恋者更认同自由的性别角色态度。此外,总体而言,与罪犯相比,参与者更愿意与受害者保持社会联系。然而,只有在异性恋中,强奸神话与与受害者保持社会联系的意愿之间存在显著的负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Temida
Temida CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信