Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from south-eastern Europe

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Spatium Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2298/spat220603009h
M. Hadžić, Slavka Zeković
{"title":"Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from south-eastern Europe","authors":"M. Hadžić, Slavka Zeković","doi":"10.2298/spat220603009h","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global economy has been faced with two dramatic crises (the global financial crisis and the pandemic), and it is still suffering. As an answer to the first crisis, the European Union formulated reindustrialization as a development approach, by which it wanted to strengthen its position on the world market, with the aim of manufacturing achieving a 1/5 share of the GDP. During the last decade, results have differed among the member countries, as well among the candidates for membership. Some countries have continued the trend of deindustrialization, while others have succeeded in starting reindustrialization. However, what is clear is the fact that achieving the goal defined is a challenge for all. There are economists who argue that this goal is not only unrealistic, but even not useful. The paper presents a comparative analysis exploring the development characteristics of several countries in South-Eastern Europe (SEE): Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Kosovo and Serbia, using a meta-analysis in a synthesis of the results of this empirical research. It also shows a regression analysis and correlation analysis using the IBM SPSPS 28 software package. The paper analyzes whether the countries considered follow the trend of deindustrialization or reindustrialization, and it examines and tests whether a higher share of manufacturing within the GDP results in a higher rate of growth. The results show that all the countries under consideration have already fulfilled the aim of manufacturing having a 20% share of their GDP (except Montenegro). At the same time all of the countries, except two (Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia), have experienced a deindustrialization trend. The paper could be useful for policy makers in South-Eastern European Countries as well other transitory/transitional countries as they create reindustrialization policies in line with the EU industrial policy.","PeriodicalId":38713,"journal":{"name":"Spatium","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/spat220603009h","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global economy has been faced with two dramatic crises (the global financial crisis and the pandemic), and it is still suffering. As an answer to the first crisis, the European Union formulated reindustrialization as a development approach, by which it wanted to strengthen its position on the world market, with the aim of manufacturing achieving a 1/5 share of the GDP. During the last decade, results have differed among the member countries, as well among the candidates for membership. Some countries have continued the trend of deindustrialization, while others have succeeded in starting reindustrialization. However, what is clear is the fact that achieving the goal defined is a challenge for all. There are economists who argue that this goal is not only unrealistic, but even not useful. The paper presents a comparative analysis exploring the development characteristics of several countries in South-Eastern Europe (SEE): Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Kosovo and Serbia, using a meta-analysis in a synthesis of the results of this empirical research. It also shows a regression analysis and correlation analysis using the IBM SPSPS 28 software package. The paper analyzes whether the countries considered follow the trend of deindustrialization or reindustrialization, and it examines and tests whether a higher share of manufacturing within the GDP results in a higher rate of growth. The results show that all the countries under consideration have already fulfilled the aim of manufacturing having a 20% share of their GDP (except Montenegro). At the same time all of the countries, except two (Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia), have experienced a deindustrialization trend. The paper could be useful for policy makers in South-Eastern European Countries as well other transitory/transitional countries as they create reindustrialization policies in line with the EU industrial policy.
再工业化是一条现实的道路吗?来自东南欧的经验主义见解
全球经济面临着两次重大危机(全球金融危机和大流行病),而且仍在遭受痛苦。作为对第一次危机的回答,欧洲联盟制定了再工业化作为一种发展方法,通过这种方法,它希望加强其在世界市场上的地位,其目标是使制造业占国内生产总值的五分之一。在过去十年中,成员国之间以及候选成员国之间的结果各不相同。一些国家继续着去工业化的趋势,而另一些国家则成功地开始了再工业化。然而,明确的事实是,实现所确定的目标对所有人来说都是一项挑战。一些经济学家认为,这一目标不仅不切实际,甚至毫无用处。本文对东南欧(SEE)的几个国家:阿尔巴尼亚、波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那、克罗地亚、黑山、北马其顿、科索沃和塞尔维亚的发展特征进行了比较分析,并对实证研究的结果进行了综合分析。本文还展示了使用IBM SPSPS 28软件包进行的回归分析和相关分析。本文分析了所考虑的国家是否遵循去工业化或再工业化的趋势,并检验和检验了制造业在GDP中所占份额越高是否会导致更高的增长率。结果表明,所有考虑的国家都已经实现了制造业占GDP的20%的目标(黑山除外)。与此同时,除两个国家(波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那和北马其顿)外,所有国家都经历了去工业化趋势。对于东南欧国家以及其他过渡/转型国家的政策制定者来说,这篇论文可能是有用的,因为他们正在制定符合欧盟产业政策的再工业化政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spatium
Spatium Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信