From active audience to passive data: Dominant conceptualizations of internet users

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Sociologija Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2298/soc1904521k
Jelena Kleut
{"title":"From active audience to passive data: Dominant conceptualizations of internet users","authors":"Jelena Kleut","doi":"10.2298/soc1904521k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within wider approaches to defining audience in communication studies, this article aims to provide critical analysis of the terms which describe new relations that appear between individuals and respective digital communication centres. On the basis of the explicit and implicit understanding of the agency of internet users, we identify several approaches and terms characteristic of them. The first group includes concepts where power is relatively equally distributed among the actors of digital communication, with the terms such are user generated content and citizen journalism at the forefront. Terms convergence culture and produsage belong to the second group, and they see the networked individuals as empowered challengers of the linear communication flows. The third group, defines users as abstract sets of big social data without the individual agency. The fourth group, with the terms such are small acts of engagement, locates user agency in the practices of sense-making and everyday life. The key point of divergence between these approaches is found in the answers they provide to the following questions: who has the power, over what and how it is evaluated in the totality of digital communication.","PeriodicalId":43515,"journal":{"name":"Sociologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/soc1904521k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within wider approaches to defining audience in communication studies, this article aims to provide critical analysis of the terms which describe new relations that appear between individuals and respective digital communication centres. On the basis of the explicit and implicit understanding of the agency of internet users, we identify several approaches and terms characteristic of them. The first group includes concepts where power is relatively equally distributed among the actors of digital communication, with the terms such are user generated content and citizen journalism at the forefront. Terms convergence culture and produsage belong to the second group, and they see the networked individuals as empowered challengers of the linear communication flows. The third group, defines users as abstract sets of big social data without the individual agency. The fourth group, with the terms such are small acts of engagement, locates user agency in the practices of sense-making and everyday life. The key point of divergence between these approaches is found in the answers they provide to the following questions: who has the power, over what and how it is evaluated in the totality of digital communication.
从主动受众到被动数据:互联网用户的主导概念
在传播研究中定义受众的更广泛方法中,本文旨在对描述个人与各自数字传播中心之间出现的新关系的术语进行批判性分析。在对网络用户代理的显性和隐性理解的基础上,我们确定了网络用户代理的几种方法和术语特征。第一组包括权力在数字通信参与者之间相对平均分配的概念,其中用户生成内容和公民新闻等术语处于最前沿。融合文化和产品使用属于第二组,他们将网络化的个人视为线性通信流程的授权挑战者。第三组,将用户定义为没有个体代理的抽象的大社会数据集。第四种是“参与的小行为”,将用户代理定位于意义构建和日常生活的实践中。这些方法之间的关键分歧在于它们对以下问题的回答:谁拥有权力,控制什么,以及如何在数字通信的整体中评估权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sociologija
Sociologija SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信