Nationalism as a structural obstacle to democratization of Bosnia and Herzegovina society

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Sociologija Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2298/SOC1901087J
A. Janković
{"title":"Nationalism as a structural obstacle to democratization of Bosnia and Herzegovina society","authors":"A. Janković","doi":"10.2298/SOC1901087J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to investigate the intensity and dispersion of nationalism among young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina at two time points - in the period of late socialism (1989) and in the period of consolidated post-socialist transformation (2012). In addition, our intention is to investigate the determinants of nationalism in the socialist and post-socialist period and compare them to determine whether there are different mechanisms of generating nationalism in two different systems of social reproduction, or they are in fact active long-term factors lasting longer than various social systems. The starting premise is that nationalism was not widespread in the period of socialism, and that its expansion and deep rooting started in the Post-Daytonian Bosnia and Herzegovina society. This creates a structural obstacle to the transition from formal to higher form of democracy (the so-called effective democracy). In the empirical part of the research, we rely on instruments for measuring nationalism that have been used on several occasions in empirical research in Serbia and Croatia. The data we use was collected in the survey called ?Social Structure and Quality of Life?, conducted in 1989 in all the republics of Yugoslavia, and the ?Value Orientation and Attitude Towards Social Changes?, conducted in 2012 in the Doboj region of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Data in these two surveys is completely comparable.","PeriodicalId":43515,"journal":{"name":"Sociologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1901087J","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the intensity and dispersion of nationalism among young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina at two time points - in the period of late socialism (1989) and in the period of consolidated post-socialist transformation (2012). In addition, our intention is to investigate the determinants of nationalism in the socialist and post-socialist period and compare them to determine whether there are different mechanisms of generating nationalism in two different systems of social reproduction, or they are in fact active long-term factors lasting longer than various social systems. The starting premise is that nationalism was not widespread in the period of socialism, and that its expansion and deep rooting started in the Post-Daytonian Bosnia and Herzegovina society. This creates a structural obstacle to the transition from formal to higher form of democracy (the so-called effective democracy). In the empirical part of the research, we rely on instruments for measuring nationalism that have been used on several occasions in empirical research in Serbia and Croatia. The data we use was collected in the survey called ?Social Structure and Quality of Life?, conducted in 1989 in all the republics of Yugoslavia, and the ?Value Orientation and Attitude Towards Social Changes?, conducted in 2012 in the Doboj region of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Data in these two surveys is completely comparable.
民族主义是波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那社会民主化的结构性障碍
本文的目的是调查波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那年轻人中民族主义的强度和分散在两个时间点-在社会主义晚期(1989年)和巩固后社会主义转型时期(2012年)。此外,我们的目的是研究社会主义和后社会主义时期民族主义的决定因素,并对它们进行比较,以确定在两种不同的社会再生产制度中,民族主义的产生机制是否不同,或者它们实际上是比各种社会制度持续时间更长的积极的长期因素。本文的出发点是民族主义在社会主义时期并不普遍,民族主义的扩张和深入植根于后戴顿时期的波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那社会。这就造成了从正式民主向高级民主(所谓有效民主)过渡的结构性障碍。在研究的实证部分,我们依赖于在塞尔维亚和克罗地亚的实证研究中多次使用的测量民族主义的工具。我们使用的数据是在一项名为“社会结构和生活质量”的调查中收集的。1989年在南斯拉夫各共和国进行的“价值取向和对社会变革的态度”调查。2012年在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那多博伊地区进行的调查。这两次调查的数据完全具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sociologija
Sociologija SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信