The manuscript authority of political thoughts

IF 0.5 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT Pub Date : 1999-01-01 DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691147888.003.0008

R. Wokler

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Contextualist interpretations of political thought need to be imaginatively constructed no less than the philosophically abstract readings they are often designed to supplant. Examples of recent scholarship on Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau, in particular, illustrate problems in establishing contextual meaning with precision. Manuscripts often embrace their authors' notions in an unrefined state, in their gestation and the immediacy of their first formulations. The study of manuscripts sometimes invites a free association of ideas across what, in a post-Enlightenment world, may be perceived as circumscribed disciplinary boundaries.

查看原文本刊更多论文

政治思想的手稿权威

语境主义对政治思想的解释需要富有想象力地构建，就像它们经常被设计用来取代的哲学抽象解读一样。尤其是最近关于霍布斯、洛克和卢梭的学术研究，说明了在精确地建立语境意义方面存在的问题。手稿通常在未精炼的状态下拥抱作者的观念，在他们的孕育和他们的第一个公式的即时性。对手稿的研究有时会带来一种思想的自由结合，而在后启蒙时代的世界里，这些思想可能被认为是受限制的学科界限。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： History of Political Thought (HPT) is a quarterly journal which was launched in 1980 to fill a genuine academic need for a forum for work in this multi-disciplinary area. Although a subject central to the study of politics and history, researchers in this field had previously to compete for publication space in journals whose intellectual centres of gravity were located in other disciplines. The journal is devoted exclusively to the historical study of political ideas and associated methodological problems. The primary focus is on research papers, with extensive book reviews and bibliographic surveys also included. All articles are refereed.