STAR SIGN study: Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy against the SARS-CoV-2 variants BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Simon Woelfel, Joel Dütschler, Marius K?nig, Alex Dulovic, Nicole Graf, Daniel Junker, Vasileios Oikonomou, Claudia Krieger, Samuel Truniger, Annett Franke, Annika Eckhold, Kristina Forsch, Seraina Koller, Jacqueline Wyss, Niklas Krupka, Melanie Oberholzer, Nicola Frei, Nora Geissler, Peter Schaub, STAR SIGN Study Investigators, Werner C. Albrich, Matthias Friedrich, Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra, Benjamin Misselwitz, Wolfgang Korte, Justus J. Bürgi, Stephan Brand
{"title":"STAR SIGN study: Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy against the SARS-CoV-2 variants BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease","authors":"Simon Woelfel, Joel Dütschler, Marius K?nig, Alex Dulovic, Nicole Graf, Daniel Junker, Vasileios Oikonomou, Claudia Krieger, Samuel Truniger, Annett Franke, Annika Eckhold, Kristina Forsch, Seraina Koller, Jacqueline Wyss, Niklas Krupka, Melanie Oberholzer, Nicola Frei, Nora Geissler, Peter Schaub, STAR SIGN Study Investigators, Werner C. Albrich, Matthias Friedrich, Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra, Benjamin Misselwitz, Wolfgang Korte, Justus J. Bürgi, Stephan Brand","doi":"10.1111/apt.17661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Vaccine-elicited immune responses are impaired in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-TNF biologics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To assess vaccination efficacy against the novel omicron sublineages BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 in immunosuppressed patients with IBD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective multicentre case–control study included 98 biologic-treated patients with IBD and 48 healthy controls. Anti-spike IgG concentrations and surrogate neutralisation against SARS-CoV-2 wild-type, BA.1, BA.5, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 were measured at two different time points (2–16 weeks and 22–40 weeks) following third dose vaccination. Surrogate neutralisation was based on antibody-mediated blockage of ACE2-spike protein–protein interaction. Primary outcome was surrogate neutralisation against tested SARS-CoV-2 sublineages. Secondary outcomes were proportions of participants with insufficient surrogate neutralisation, impact of breakthrough infection, and correlation of surrogate neutralisation with anti-spike IgG concentration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Surrogate neutralisation against all tested sublineages was reduced in patients with IBD who were treated with anti-TNF biologics compared to patients treated with non-anti-TNF biologics and healthy controls (each <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001) at visit 1. Anti-TNF therapy (odds ratio 0.29 [95% CI 0.19–0.46]) and time since vaccination (0.85 [0.72–1.00]) were associated with low, and mRNA-1273 vaccination (1.86 [1.12–3.08]) with high wild-type surrogate neutralisation in a β-regression model. Accordingly, higher proportions of patients treated with anti-TNF biologics had insufficient surrogate neutralisation against omicron sublineages at visit 1 compared to patients treated with non-anti-TNF biologics and healthy controls (each <i>p</i> ≤ 0.015). Surrogate neutralisation against all tested sublineages decreased over time but was increased by breakthrough infection. Anti-spike IgG concentrations correlated with surrogate neutralisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with IBD who are treated with anti-TNF biologics show impaired neutralisation against novel omicron sublineages BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 and may benefit from prioritisation for future variant-adapted vaccines.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"58 7","pages":"678-691"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.17661","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Vaccine-elicited immune responses are impaired in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-TNF biologics.
Aims
To assess vaccination efficacy against the novel omicron sublineages BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 in immunosuppressed patients with IBD.
Methods
This prospective multicentre case–control study included 98 biologic-treated patients with IBD and 48 healthy controls. Anti-spike IgG concentrations and surrogate neutralisation against SARS-CoV-2 wild-type, BA.1, BA.5, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 were measured at two different time points (2–16 weeks and 22–40 weeks) following third dose vaccination. Surrogate neutralisation was based on antibody-mediated blockage of ACE2-spike protein–protein interaction. Primary outcome was surrogate neutralisation against tested SARS-CoV-2 sublineages. Secondary outcomes were proportions of participants with insufficient surrogate neutralisation, impact of breakthrough infection, and correlation of surrogate neutralisation with anti-spike IgG concentration.
Results
Surrogate neutralisation against all tested sublineages was reduced in patients with IBD who were treated with anti-TNF biologics compared to patients treated with non-anti-TNF biologics and healthy controls (each p ≤ 0.001) at visit 1. Anti-TNF therapy (odds ratio 0.29 [95% CI 0.19–0.46]) and time since vaccination (0.85 [0.72–1.00]) were associated with low, and mRNA-1273 vaccination (1.86 [1.12–3.08]) with high wild-type surrogate neutralisation in a β-regression model. Accordingly, higher proportions of patients treated with anti-TNF biologics had insufficient surrogate neutralisation against omicron sublineages at visit 1 compared to patients treated with non-anti-TNF biologics and healthy controls (each p ≤ 0.015). Surrogate neutralisation against all tested sublineages decreased over time but was increased by breakthrough infection. Anti-spike IgG concentrations correlated with surrogate neutralisation.
Conclusions
Patients with IBD who are treated with anti-TNF biologics show impaired neutralisation against novel omicron sublineages BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 and may benefit from prioritisation for future variant-adapted vaccines.
STAR SIGN研究:评估COVID-19疫苗对炎症性肠病患者SARS-CoV-2变体BQ.1.1和XBB.1.5的疗效
背景:在接受抗肿瘤坏死因子生物制剂治疗的炎症性肠病(IBD)患者中,疫苗引发的免疫反应受损。目的评价免疫抑制IBD患者对新型组粒亚谱系BQ.1.1和XBB.1.5的免疫接种效果。方法本前瞻性多中心病例对照研究包括98例IBD生物治疗患者和48例健康对照。在第三次接种后2-16周和22-40周,测定抗刺突IgG浓度和对SARS-CoV-2野生型、BA.1、BA.5、BQ.1.1和XBB.1.5的替代中和作用。替代中和是基于抗体介导的阻断ACE2-spike蛋白相互作用。主要结局是对检测的SARS-CoV-2亚谱系的替代中和。次要结果是替代抗体中和不足的参与者比例、突破感染的影响以及替代抗体中和与抗刺突IgG浓度的相关性。结果:与接受非抗tnf生物制剂治疗的患者和健康对照相比,接受抗tnf生物制剂治疗的IBD患者对所有测试亚谱系的替代中和作用降低(各p≤0.001)。在β-回归模型中,抗tnf治疗(优势比0.29 [95% CI 0.19-0.46])和接种时间(0.85[0.72-1.00])与低mRNA-1273疫苗接种(1.86[1.12-3.08])和高野生型替代中和相关。因此,与接受非抗tnf生物制剂治疗的患者和健康对照相比,接受抗tnf生物制剂治疗的患者在第一次就诊时对组微粒亚谱系的替代中和作用不足的比例更高(p≤0.015)。对所有测试亚谱系的替代中和随着时间的推移而下降,但随着突破感染而增加。抗刺突IgG浓度与替代中和相关。结论:接受抗肿瘤坏死因子生物制剂治疗的IBD患者对新型组粒亚谱系BQ.1.1和XBB.1.5的中和作用受损,可能会受益于未来变体适应疫苗的优先考虑。
期刊介绍:
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.