DETERMINATION OF PASSING GRADE FOR EDUCATIONAL EQUALITY EXAM RESULTS IN PACKAGE C PROGRAM BASED ON PASSING COMPETENCY STANDAR

O. Komar, C. Sukmana
{"title":"DETERMINATION OF PASSING GRADE FOR EDUCATIONAL EQUALITY EXAM RESULTS IN PACKAGE C PROGRAM BASED ON PASSING COMPETENCY STANDAR","authors":"O. Komar, C. Sukmana","doi":"10.22460/empowerment.v11i2.3271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The background of this study is related to the complexity of canceling the 2020 UN implementation. However, it is said that graduates who graduate from the equivalent school unit/application through the easiest means have completed the study application during the COVID-19 pandemic as evidenced by means of playing card documents every semester, reaching the correct minimum attitude/behavior score and take the exam prepared through the school unit facilities. So that for now it no longer reaches the graduate competency standard (SKL). Meanwhile, the application of school equity (Package A, B, and C) is the flagship of non-formal schooling efforts to contribute to suppressing network problems that are hampered in gaining access to schools, drop outs and are constrained to enter the community. school offerings, especially competencies/lifestyle competencies, school offerings that remain complete and evolving through various packages on the network. Therefore, this discussion aims to provoke opportunities for answers to these problems through searching and finding product models for equality schools examining content material, especially based entirely on the competency requirements of graduates of package C applications at the school unit level. The concepts and theories used as references in this research consist of Community Education Concepts and Theories, school equity (Package A, B, and C), and academic tests mainly based on graduate competency requirements. This review uses the ADDIE type of study and development (R & D), this selection is mainly based entirely on the purpose of the study to provide a version of equivalence testing. The place of this research was carried out in PKBM bina Mandiri and Ash-shoddiq. The results of the experiment to create a product version of the equivalency school examination material are mainly based entirely on the competency requirements of the package C application graduates at the school unit level. For the future, this research can present a limitation in the assessment of equivalence education and provide an overview in the implementation of equivalence education.","PeriodicalId":32025,"journal":{"name":"Empowerment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empowerment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22460/empowerment.v11i2.3271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The background of this study is related to the complexity of canceling the 2020 UN implementation. However, it is said that graduates who graduate from the equivalent school unit/application through the easiest means have completed the study application during the COVID-19 pandemic as evidenced by means of playing card documents every semester, reaching the correct minimum attitude/behavior score and take the exam prepared through the school unit facilities. So that for now it no longer reaches the graduate competency standard (SKL). Meanwhile, the application of school equity (Package A, B, and C) is the flagship of non-formal schooling efforts to contribute to suppressing network problems that are hampered in gaining access to schools, drop outs and are constrained to enter the community. school offerings, especially competencies/lifestyle competencies, school offerings that remain complete and evolving through various packages on the network. Therefore, this discussion aims to provoke opportunities for answers to these problems through searching and finding product models for equality schools examining content material, especially based entirely on the competency requirements of graduates of package C applications at the school unit level. The concepts and theories used as references in this research consist of Community Education Concepts and Theories, school equity (Package A, B, and C), and academic tests mainly based on graduate competency requirements. This review uses the ADDIE type of study and development (R & D), this selection is mainly based entirely on the purpose of the study to provide a version of equivalence testing. The place of this research was carried out in PKBM bina Mandiri and Ash-shoddiq. The results of the experiment to create a product version of the equivalency school examination material are mainly based entirely on the competency requirements of the package C application graduates at the school unit level. For the future, this research can present a limitation in the assessment of equivalence education and provide an overview in the implementation of equivalence education.
基于合格能力标准的c包教育公平考试成绩合格等级的确定
本研究的背景与取消2020年联合国执行的复杂性有关。但是,据说,通过最简单的方式从同等学校单位/申请毕业的毕业生,在新冠肺炎疫情期间,通过每学期的纸牌文件证明,完成了学习申请,达到了正确的最低态度/行为分数,并参加了通过学校单位设施准备的考试。因此,目前它已不再达到毕业生能力标准(SKL)。与此同时,学校公平的应用(A、B和C包)是非正规学校努力的旗舰,有助于抑制阻碍入学、辍学和限制进入社区的网络问题。学校提供的服务,特别是能力/生活方式能力,学校提供的服务通过网络上的各种软件包保持完整和不断发展。因此,本讨论旨在通过搜索和寻找平等学校检查内容材料的产品模型,特别是完全基于学校单位级别的C包应用程序毕业生的能力要求,为这些问题的答案提供机会。本研究参考的概念和理论包括社区教育概念和理论、学校公平(A、B、C包)和以研究生能力要求为主的学业测试。本综述采用ADDIE类型的研究与开发(R & D),本次选择主要是完全根据研究目的提供一个版本的等效性检验。这项研究是在比纳曼迪里和阿什绍迪克的PKBM进行的。实验结果制作的等效学校考试材料的产品版本主要是完全基于包C应用毕业生在学校单位层面的胜任力要求。对于未来,本研究可以提出对对等教育评价的局限性,并为对等教育的实施提供概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信