{"title":"T.S. Eliot and the Sense of History","authors":"Benjamin G. Lockerd","doi":"10.22455/2541-7894-2022-13-134-147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eliot’s deep interest in ideas about history began early and continued throughout his life. In his student days, he encountered the concepts of human pre-history put forward by early anthropologists such as Emile Durkheim and Lucien Lévy-Bruhl. He studied under Josiah Royce and George Santayana, was aware of the historical writing of his distant relative Henry Adams. The paper also dwells at some length on Eliot’s attitude to the “Whig historians” and the Criterion-group historians. As Eliot entered the Christian fold, his idea of history became that of the Bible and the Church. He followed St. Augustine, was deeply influenced by the British Catholic historian Christopher Dawson. As a Christian, Eliot rejected both progressive and regressive views of history as well as determinism in favor of a belief in free will, the doctrine of Original Sin and faith in Providence. Eliot’s views involve a challenge to the secular view of history, and his key terms are based on his Christian vision: the “historical sense”, in the meaning of awareness of “tradition”, which carries the truths of Revelation and the wisdom of the ages forward in time, adapting them somewhat to various times and cultures but remaining faithful to the essential truths, the “permanent things.”","PeriodicalId":34458,"journal":{"name":"Literatura dvukh Amerik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatura dvukh Amerik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2022-13-134-147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Eliot’s deep interest in ideas about history began early and continued throughout his life. In his student days, he encountered the concepts of human pre-history put forward by early anthropologists such as Emile Durkheim and Lucien Lévy-Bruhl. He studied under Josiah Royce and George Santayana, was aware of the historical writing of his distant relative Henry Adams. The paper also dwells at some length on Eliot’s attitude to the “Whig historians” and the Criterion-group historians. As Eliot entered the Christian fold, his idea of history became that of the Bible and the Church. He followed St. Augustine, was deeply influenced by the British Catholic historian Christopher Dawson. As a Christian, Eliot rejected both progressive and regressive views of history as well as determinism in favor of a belief in free will, the doctrine of Original Sin and faith in Providence. Eliot’s views involve a challenge to the secular view of history, and his key terms are based on his Christian vision: the “historical sense”, in the meaning of awareness of “tradition”, which carries the truths of Revelation and the wisdom of the ages forward in time, adapting them somewhat to various times and cultures but remaining faithful to the essential truths, the “permanent things.”
艾略特对历史观念的浓厚兴趣很早就开始了,并贯穿了他的一生。在学生时代,他接触到了早期人类学家如埃米尔·迪尔凯姆(Emile Durkheim)和吕西安·卢萨维·布鲁尔(Lucien l - bruhl)提出的人类史前史概念。他师从乔赛亚·罗伊斯和乔治·桑塔亚那,了解他的远房亲戚亨利·亚当斯的历史著作。本文还详细论述了艾略特对“辉格党历史学家”和“标准派历史学家”的态度。随着艾略特加入基督教阵营,他的历史观变成了圣经和教会的历史观。他追随圣奥古斯丁,深受英国天主教历史学家克里斯托弗·道森的影响。作为一名基督徒,艾略特反对进步和倒退的历史观,也反对宿命论,他信奉自由意志、原罪学说和上帝的信仰。艾略特的观点涉及到对世俗历史观的挑战,他的关键术语是基于他的基督教视野:“历史感”,在“传统”意识的意义上,它承载着启示的真理和时代的智慧,在一定程度上适应不同的时代和文化,但仍然忠实于基本的真理,即“永恒的事物”。