{"title":"English and American Travel Writing of the 1930s on Soviet Russia","authors":"I. Kabanova","doi":"10.22455/2541-7894-2021-10-228-265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting with a survey of historical and ideological reasons for the unprecedented rise of Western interest in Russia after 1917 and especially after the Great Depression, the paper focuses on the travel books widely read on both sides of the Atlantic in the 1930s. The decade saw the blooming of travel prose in the English-speaking world, as well as the peak of enthusiasm for Russia during the XXth century. The paper attempts a closer look at the travel books on Soviet Russia, usually dismissed by critics as lacking in the quality of writing, too ideological. First the model of stereotypical book based on short Intourist tour is described (motive structure, prevailing parroting of Soviet propaganda clichés). Next follow the books produced by Western residents in the USSR, or persons who escaped Intourist surveillance and experienced some direct contact with Soviet people. They certainly look at Russia under the Western eye, but are able (to a different degree) to empathize with the drama and tragedy of Stalin’s Russia. From half-hearted account of “fellow-traveller” M. Hindus, the paper proceeds to fundamental “Assignment in Utopia” by E. Lyons, who turned from ardent Communist into highly argumentative critic of Soviet Russia, and to the unique project of writing a comic book about kolkhoz by E.M. Delafield, that resulted in a witty critique of Soviet aims and ways. In finding their way not just around Stalin’s Russia, but in providing the reader with the road to the authors’ inner selves, these books are still relevant today","PeriodicalId":34458,"journal":{"name":"Literatura dvukh Amerik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatura dvukh Amerik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2021-10-228-265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Starting with a survey of historical and ideological reasons for the unprecedented rise of Western interest in Russia after 1917 and especially after the Great Depression, the paper focuses on the travel books widely read on both sides of the Atlantic in the 1930s. The decade saw the blooming of travel prose in the English-speaking world, as well as the peak of enthusiasm for Russia during the XXth century. The paper attempts a closer look at the travel books on Soviet Russia, usually dismissed by critics as lacking in the quality of writing, too ideological. First the model of stereotypical book based on short Intourist tour is described (motive structure, prevailing parroting of Soviet propaganda clichés). Next follow the books produced by Western residents in the USSR, or persons who escaped Intourist surveillance and experienced some direct contact with Soviet people. They certainly look at Russia under the Western eye, but are able (to a different degree) to empathize with the drama and tragedy of Stalin’s Russia. From half-hearted account of “fellow-traveller” M. Hindus, the paper proceeds to fundamental “Assignment in Utopia” by E. Lyons, who turned from ardent Communist into highly argumentative critic of Soviet Russia, and to the unique project of writing a comic book about kolkhoz by E.M. Delafield, that resulted in a witty critique of Soviet aims and ways. In finding their way not just around Stalin’s Russia, but in providing the reader with the road to the authors’ inner selves, these books are still relevant today
本文首先考察了1917年之后,尤其是大萧条之后,西方对俄罗斯的兴趣空前高涨的历史和意识形态原因,重点研究了20世纪30年代在大西洋两岸广泛阅读的旅行书籍。这十年见证了英语世界旅行散文的蓬勃发展,以及20世纪对俄罗斯的热情达到顶峰。这篇文章试图更仔细地审视关于苏联俄罗斯的旅行书籍,这些书籍通常被批评为缺乏写作质量,过于意识形态化。首先描述了基于短期旅游的刻板印象书模型(动机结构,普遍的苏联宣传陈词滥调的模仿)。接下来是苏联的西方居民或逃脱英图尔监视并与苏联人有过直接接触的人所写的书。他们当然是在西方的眼光下看待俄罗斯,但也能够(在不同程度上)对斯大林统治下的俄罗斯的戏剧性和悲剧产生共鸣。从对“同路人”欣都斯的半心半意的描述开始,文章接着谈到莱昂斯(E. Lyons)的《乌托邦的任务》(Assignment in Utopia),莱昂斯从热情的共产主义者变成了对苏联极具争议性的批评者;接着是德拉菲尔德(E.M. Delafield)写的一本关于集体农庄的漫画书的独特计划,这本书对苏联的目标和方式进行了诙谐的批评。这些书不仅在斯大林统治下的俄罗斯找到了出路,而且为读者提供了通往作者内心自我的道路,这些书在今天仍然具有现实意义