Leonardo, Mona Lisa and "La Gioconda". Reviewing the Evidence

IF 0.1 3区艺术学 0 ART

Artibus et Historiae Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI:10.2307/1483789

J. Greenstein

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Although the title La Gioconda appears on the Salai inventory and was later used at Fontainebleau, the case for accepting Vasari's claim that the painting is a portrait of Mona Lisa del Giocondo is not as strong as recent studies suggest. Critics who used the title before 1642 did not think that it referred to the surname of the sitter. A review of the evidence casts doubts on Vasari's credibility, but illuminates the unusual purpose of Leonardo's painting.

查看原文本刊更多论文

列奥纳多、蒙娜丽莎和《乔康达》。审查证据

尽管《乔孔达》这个标题出现在萨莱的藏品清单上，后来在枫丹白露也被使用过，但瓦萨里声称这幅画是《蒙娜丽莎·德尔·乔孔达》的说法并不像最近的研究表明的那样有力。在1642年之前使用这一头衔的评论家并不认为它指的是画中人的姓氏。对这些证据的回顾让人们对瓦萨里的可信度产生了怀疑，但却揭示了达芬奇这幅画不同寻常的目的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Artibus et Historiae ART-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Artibus et Historiae is a journal dedicated to the visual arts, published by IRSA Publishing House. The lavishly illustrated articles cover a broad range of subjects, including photography and film, as well as traditional topics of scholarly art research. Artibus et Historiae particularly encourages interdisciplinary studies - art history in conjunction with other humanistic fields, such as psychology, sociology, philosophy, or literature - and unconventional approaches. Thus it is hoped that the current trends in art history will be well represented in our issues. Artibus et Historiae appears twice a year, in hardback. The articles are in one of four languages: English, Italian, German, or French, at the author"s discretion.