Validation of scales for measuring factors of teaching quality from the dynamic model of educational effectiveness

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psihologija Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2298/psi200915010b
Bojana Bodroža, J. Teodorović, Smiljana Jošić
{"title":"Validation of scales for measuring factors of teaching quality from the dynamic model of educational effectiveness","authors":"Bojana Bodroža, J. Teodorović, Smiljana Jošić","doi":"10.2298/psi200915010b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large-scale educational effectiveness research requires valid student questionnaires to assess teaching practices. This research validated eight scales for measuring teaching factors from the Dynamic Model of Educational Effectiveness (DMEE). Parallel versions of scales for measuring teaching factors in mathematics and biology were constructed and validated in two studies. In the first study, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted on data from 683 students. In the second study, the structure was cross-validated via a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on a sample of 5,476 students. The multi-group CFA resulted in an acceptable metric invarience for all scales, indicating that the scales have comparable factor loadings. However, unsatisfactory scalar invariance suggested that the scales could not be used to compare teachers of different subjects. Testing alternative structural relations between the teaching factors did not confirm that the data fit the DMEE model adequately, although the fit parameters were better than for the alternative theoretical models. For mathematics, the external validation of the scales showed that the scales correlated with job satisfaction, external control, and teacher self-efficacy reported by the teachers. The scales are reliable and valid and could be applied to different school subjects.","PeriodicalId":45301,"journal":{"name":"Psihologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologija","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/psi200915010b","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large-scale educational effectiveness research requires valid student questionnaires to assess teaching practices. This research validated eight scales for measuring teaching factors from the Dynamic Model of Educational Effectiveness (DMEE). Parallel versions of scales for measuring teaching factors in mathematics and biology were constructed and validated in two studies. In the first study, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted on data from 683 students. In the second study, the structure was cross-validated via a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on a sample of 5,476 students. The multi-group CFA resulted in an acceptable metric invarience for all scales, indicating that the scales have comparable factor loadings. However, unsatisfactory scalar invariance suggested that the scales could not be used to compare teachers of different subjects. Testing alternative structural relations between the teaching factors did not confirm that the data fit the DMEE model adequately, although the fit parameters were better than for the alternative theoretical models. For mathematics, the external validation of the scales showed that the scales correlated with job satisfaction, external control, and teacher self-efficacy reported by the teachers. The scales are reliable and valid and could be applied to different school subjects.
从教育效果动态模型看教学质量测量因素量表的验证
大规模的教育有效性研究需要有效的学生问卷来评估教学实践。本研究验证了教育效能动态模型(Dynamic Model of Educational Effectiveness, DMEE)中八个测量教学因素的量表。本文构建了平行版本的数学和生物教学因素量表,并在两项研究中进行了验证。在第一个研究中,对683名学生的数据进行了探索性因素分析。在第二项研究中,通过验证性因子分析(CFA)对5,476名学生的样本进行了交叉验证。多组CFA对所有量表得出了可接受的度量不变性,表明量表具有可比的因子负荷。然而,标量不变性不理想,表明该量表不能用于比较不同学科的教师。测试教学因素之间的替代结构关系并没有证实数据充分拟合DMEE模型,尽管拟合参数优于替代理论模型。在数学方面,量表的外部验证表明,量表与教师报告的工作满意度、外部控制和教师自我效能感相关。该量表具有较高的信度和效度,适用于不同的学校科目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psihologija
Psihologija PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信