Volatility spillover networks of credit risk: Evidence from ASW and CDS spreads in Turkey and Brazil

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Samet Gunay, E. Çevik, S. Dibooğlu
{"title":"Volatility spillover networks of credit risk: Evidence from ASW and CDS spreads in Turkey and Brazil","authors":"Samet Gunay, E. Çevik, S. Dibooğlu","doi":"10.2298/pan210220007g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines received and transmitted volatility spillovers of Credit Default Swap (CDS) and Asset-Swap Spread (ASW) for Brazil and Turkey. The empirical analysis is implemented using two country-based (stock markets and exchange rates) and two global (volatility index and global economic activity index) variables to account for the impact of integration into global markets. Empirical results suggest that both countries display distinctive features in their spillover networks. While exchange rates and the stock market figure prominently in Brazil as a source of spillovers, for Turkey, the primary element in spillovers appears to be credit risk indicators. Time-varying analysis results show that the European Debt Crisis of 2010-2011 and the global liquidity crunch of 2018-2019 are two critical periods in volatility spillovers that occurred toward credit risk indicators. Brazil displays more sensitivity to the developments of the pandemic than Turkey, likely due to its dependence on global economic activity and energy prices. Finally, for both countries, the leading variable in spillovers to credit risk indicators during financial turbulence episodes appears to be foreign exchange markets. This result highlights both economies' fragility and vulnerability to foreign exchange market-based shocks. Thus, we suggest effective and solid measures in this regard. Otherwise, those shocks could potentially induce a higher cost of financing in both economies due to the negative impacts on CDS and ASW spreads.","PeriodicalId":45222,"journal":{"name":"Panoeconomicus","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panoeconomicus","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/pan210220007g","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines received and transmitted volatility spillovers of Credit Default Swap (CDS) and Asset-Swap Spread (ASW) for Brazil and Turkey. The empirical analysis is implemented using two country-based (stock markets and exchange rates) and two global (volatility index and global economic activity index) variables to account for the impact of integration into global markets. Empirical results suggest that both countries display distinctive features in their spillover networks. While exchange rates and the stock market figure prominently in Brazil as a source of spillovers, for Turkey, the primary element in spillovers appears to be credit risk indicators. Time-varying analysis results show that the European Debt Crisis of 2010-2011 and the global liquidity crunch of 2018-2019 are two critical periods in volatility spillovers that occurred toward credit risk indicators. Brazil displays more sensitivity to the developments of the pandemic than Turkey, likely due to its dependence on global economic activity and energy prices. Finally, for both countries, the leading variable in spillovers to credit risk indicators during financial turbulence episodes appears to be foreign exchange markets. This result highlights both economies' fragility and vulnerability to foreign exchange market-based shocks. Thus, we suggest effective and solid measures in this regard. Otherwise, those shocks could potentially induce a higher cost of financing in both economies due to the negative impacts on CDS and ASW spreads.
信用风险的波动溢出网络:来自土耳其和巴西的ASW和CDS价差的证据
本研究考察了巴西和土耳其信用违约互换(CDS)和资产互换价差(ASW)的接收和传导波动溢出效应。实证分析使用两个基于国家(股票市场和汇率)和两个全球(波动指数和全球经济活动指数)变量来实现,以解释融入全球市场的影响。实证结果表明,两国在溢出网络中表现出不同的特征。在巴西,汇率和股市作为溢出效应的重要来源,而在土耳其,溢出效应的主要因素似乎是信贷风险指标。时变分析结果表明,2010-2011年欧债危机和2018-2019年全球流动性紧缩是信用风险指标发生波动外溢的两个关键时期。巴西对疫情的发展比土耳其更敏感,这可能是由于其对全球经济活动和能源价格的依赖。最后,对这两个国家来说,在金融动荡时期对信贷风险指标产生溢出效应的主要变量似乎是外汇市场。这一结果凸显了经济体的脆弱性和面对外汇市场冲击的脆弱性。因此,我们建议在这方面采取切实有效的措施。否则,由于对CDS和ASW息差的负面影响,这些冲击可能会导致两个经济体的融资成本上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Panoeconomicus
Panoeconomicus ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信